0
   

The People of Iowa Repudiate Their Right to Live

 
 
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 02:45 am

The Cedar Rapids Gazette
Jan. 31

CEDAR RAPIDS —
For reasons ranging from personal security to “because I want to and I can,”
the number of Iowans with licenses to carry concealed weapons
increased 154 percent during the first year of relaxed laws
governing their issuance.

Dennis Rosekrans, 63, of rural Cedar Rapids — one of more than 60,000
Iowans who’ve secured licenses in the year since Iowa went from
a “may issue” to a “shall issue” state — said the main reason he
obtained one is that the Legislature made it easier to do.

Rosekrans said the law change enabled him legally to act upon his
long-held interest in taking responsibility for his and his family’s defense.
Melissa Halserty, 43, and Kelly Kellner, 41, friends and neighbors in
southwest Cedar Rapids, say concern about safety and security in their homes
inspired them to seek licenses to carry handguns.

“We’ve had three recent home invasions in our neighborhood, and
my husband has been after me to learn how to protect myself,” Halserty said.
“It’s not the worst neighborhood in town, but it’s not the best, either,” said Kellner,
whose husband often works an overnight shift. “I’d rather be safe than sorry.”

At the beginning of 2011, 39,397 Iowans had licenses to carry concealed weapons,
secured during an era in which county sheriffs had considerable
discretion over their issuance.
At the end of 2011, with the sheriffs’ discretion largely nullified by the law,
that number had climbed to 99,932, with more 2011 licenses still trickling into
the state database, said Sam Knowles, bureau chief of the Iowa Department of Public Safety.
That surge [micro-mini surge] — during which the percentage of Iowans with licenses to carry increased
from 1.3 percent to 3.3 percent — has been “a bit of a phenomenon,” Knowles said. [Phenomenally tiny;
in other words, 96.7% of the citizens of Iowa
show NO INTEREST in surviving the predatory violence of man or beast.]


“Just the widespread general awareness that it is available led a lot of people to think about [obtaining licenses],
but in the end, I couldn’t tell you why” the response has been so dramatic, he said.
“Honestly, I was not surprised at the increase,” said Jeff Burkett, president of the Iowa Firearms Coalition,
which lobbies and advocates for the right to keep and bear arms.
“I fully expected [the number of Iowa license holders] to reach 100,000 by the end of last year.”

In Linn County, where the number of licenses increased 183 percent — from 1,871 to 5,298 — during 2011,
Sheriff Brian Gardner said widespread publicity surrounding the law change was the biggest factor.
“People found out how easy it was to get one and took advantage,” Gardner said.
Many Iowans “got licenses just because they can,” said Lonny Pulkrabek, sheriff of Johnson County,
which registered more than a fourfold increase in carry licenses — from 552 to 2,270 — during the past year.
Pulkrabek and other informed observers say many of the license holders have no intention
of ever carrying their weapons in public. [Every motorist shud have a good spare tire, but LEAVE IT HOME.]

Halserty and Kellner, who were practicing their marksmanship Saturday
at the Izaak Walton League indoor shooting range in Cedar Rapids,
said they fall into that category.
“I just want to feel more competent that I could handle a dangerous confrontation
if one ever occurred,” Halserty said. [That 's Y she wants to leave her gun at home.]

Pulkrabek, a critic of the law, said Johnson County issued 381 licenses last year to people
with criminal records that did not include felony convictions or other disqualifiers specified in the law.
“I probably would have denied a good portion of them if I still had discretion,” he said. [Only the FINEST,
most perfect citizens have a right to live, thinks he.]


Knowles at the Department of Public Safety said he had heard of only a few untoward incidents
involving people with licenses to carry, mainly drunken driving arrests
of people carrying weapons.

Pulkrabek and Gardner said they still worry about the law’s lack
of a requirement that applicants demonstrate proficiency with a
weapon before being granted a license.

So does Bob Godlove, a 20-year handgun instructor at the Izaak Walton
League in Cedar Rapids, which for many years conducted all the
training classes, including range qualification, for Linn and
Johnson County weapons license applicants.
The league, which trained 300 applicants in 2011, still requires
range qualification before training certificates are signed.
“I was in favor of the ‘shall issue’ law, but I am not at all in
favor of giving a license to anyone who steps up and wants one,” Godlove said. [In other words: equality is bad.]

“I just want to feel more competent that I could handle a
dangerous confrontation if one ever occurred,” Halserty said.

Pulkrabek, a critic of the law, said Johnson County issued 381 licenses
last year to people with criminal records that did not include
felony convictions or other disqualifies specified in the law.
“I probably would have denied a good portion of them if I still had discretion,”
he said. [He thinks equality of the right to live is bad. ]

Knowles at the Department of Public Safety said he had heard of
only a few untoward incidents involving people with licenses to carry,
mainly drunken driving arrests of people carrying weapons.

Pulkrabek and Gardner said they still worry about the law’s lack
of a requirement that applicants demonstrate proficiency with a weapon
before being granted a license.

So does Bob Godlove, a 20-year handgun instructor at the Izaak
Walton League in Cedar Rapids, which for many years conducted
all the training classes, including range qualification, for Linn
and Johnson County weapons license applicants.

The league, which trained 300 applicants in 2011, still requires
range qualification before training certificates are signed.
“I was in favor of the ‘shall issue’ law, but I am not at all in favor
of giving a license to anyone who steps up and wants one,” Godlove said.

[All emfasis and and all red colored textual intercalations were added by David.]
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 827 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 02:57 am

The US Census Bureau tells us that the population of Iowa is over 3,000,000.
Of those, about 60,000 citizens have gotten licenses for defensive guns.

Of those 3,000,000 citizens, there shud be EITHER
3,000,000 license holders OR no licenses at all -- like Vermont, Alaska, Arizona & Wyoming,
where carrying defensive guns freely is legally respected.

I 'm worse than perplexed by the findings of this article.
I find them incomprehensible that my fellow Americans
r possessed by such apathy qua whether thay fall victim
to the predatory violence of man or beast.
97.6% of Iowans don't care
about getting licenses for defensive guns.
If (instead of being threatened by cougars or robbers)
their physicians informed them that their lives were
in danger from cancer, then woud thay be interested?
or woud thay say it makes no difference; insignificant ?


Is it that thay prefer to keep their guns anonymously, illegally??
I doubt that; I wish I cud believe that, but to my mind: its not plausible.

To me: its very sad.
I 'm usually proud of my fellow Americans.
This is de facto a humiliating rejection of the pro-freedom philosophy.
Those passive citizens, in practical effect, voted with their feet,
AWAY from the pro-freedom position.

This is as if a poll had been taken wherein 97.6% of people responding
said that nazism and communism were really pretty good.


These findings show that a citizen of Iowa has
a lack of interest in whether he or his children
or his mom & dad can control a predatory emergency,
if it arises. Being armed shows that he CARES who wins.

If a fierce beast, maybe a cougar, arrived and began to eat your mom
while she lives & objects to it, or maybe a burglar sodomizes your little boy,
is all that OK? No defense needed????

Will 97.6% of the citizens of Iowa rely upon SCREAMING
for help from the collective, as Kitty Genovese did for about an hour??

These findings are a great spiritual victory for the forces that detest personal freedom
in America -- the authoritarian-collectivists (a/k/a: liberals)-- who despise the Bill of Rights and its 2nd Amendment.

In fairness, I must admit that at election time in November
and in occasional referenda, thay HAVE supported pro-defensive freedom philosophy most of the time.


It looks very good for the USSC to put into operation nationwide
the principles of personal freedom set forth in the HELLER case (if the pro-freedom majority continues intact)
enabling citizens to travel freely while wearing their defensive firepower,
but even so, this absence of manifested popularity is disheartening.

The anti-freedom people shud be very proud.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:39 am

This relative lack of interest in one 's survival of predatory violence
is consistent with the similar absence of interest in the survival of death
from any cause which is the subject matter of study in the International Association of Near Death Studies
www.IANDS.org whose membership is a paltry & minute 1,OOO people (approximately).

World wide, it is commonly accepted that the most harsh, severe
penalty worse than ALL others is the death penalty,
but of 7,OOO,OOO,OOO people in the world the survival of death group only
has the interest of so little.

I don't understand Y people don't care about life and its continuation.

bunch of lemmings ?





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 12:04 pm

Iowa is like the ideological heartland of America.
Its saddening. James Madison woud disapprove of their apathy qua self defense.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 01:25 pm

Radical self reliance promotes Individualism and personal freedom.
Its American.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Feb, 2012 09:33 am

This is, in effect,
97.6% of the people of Iowa rejecting health insurance.

Possession of defensive guns is health insurance.





David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Drumsticks - Discussion by H2O MAN
nobody respects an oath breaker - Discussion by gungasnake
Marksmanship - Discussion by H2O MAN
Kids and Guns by the Numbers - Discussion by jcboy
Personal Defense Weapons (PDW) - Discussion by H2O MAN
Self defense with a gun - Discussion by H2O MAN
It's a sellers market - Discussion by H2O MAN
Harrisburg Pa. Outdoor Show "Postponed" - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The People of Iowa Repudiate Their Right to Live
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 12:07:13