43
   

I just don’t understand drinking and driving

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 10:44 am
@Adam4Adam,
Will making Tom unhappy HELP someone ??





David
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 12:18 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Will making Tom unhappy HELP someone ??

Maybe it will help Thom. He could have killed himself driving drunk. Maybe the consequences of his current situation will help him to behave more responsibly in the future, and to regard life, his own as well as others, more highly..

Keeping Thom off the road might help to save other lives.

Being aware of Thom's situation, and the repercussions he faces, might keep others from driving drunk.
Adam4Adam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 08:08 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Yes it will, it will get him off the street. Thom has driven home drunk for the last two years, he was just lucky before, not so much now.
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 08:20 pm
@firefly,
Out of curiosity, what sort of sentence or penalty does/do the bartender(s) who served Thom too many drinks that night and (apparently) several other nights over the last 2 yrs (according to the regular patrons who know the situation)? As a result of their negligence, he drove home drunk and committed manslaughter.

The bartenders should share some responsibility and should serve some time and/or be penalized under the law. Perhaps that bar should lose its liquor license, if that hasn't happened already?
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  4  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 08:29 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Whether or not Thom is being hurt is not relevant. There has to be a deterrent to other heavy drinkers and potential drunk drivers from getting behind the wheel of any car. If a drunk driver law and subsequent appropriate penalty keeps drunk drivers off the road, then the law serves the public. As for Thom, I'd only guess and HOPE that the term he ends up serving will be an indelible lesson which might prevent him and others who know of this tragedy from ever driving drunk again.
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 08:51 pm
@Ragman,
Wonderful theory however I do not think anyone think that there is a chance he or she will kill anyone by driving on any given night when over the legal limit so as a deterrent the theory of heavy punishments have some problems.

As far as cyclists being kill at night it is more likely that a few thousands dollars spend on both handing out LED flashers and enforcing the cycling safety laws would yield far better result then the 250 thousand dollars keeping someone lock up for a decade or so.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2012 11:45 pm
@firefly,
DAVID wrote:
Will making Tom unhappy HELP someone ??
firefly wrote:
Maybe it will help Thom. He could have killed himself driving drunk.
Maybe the consequences of his current situation will help him to behave more responsibly in the future,
and to regard life, his own as well as others, more highly..
The legal perils which have been discussed in this thread
have been severe enuf to have driven some men to suicide.
I was acquainted with 1 such fellow.
Rather than serve a year in jail, he committed suicide in late youth.

firefly wrote:
Keeping Thom off the road might help to save other lives.
True that as long as anyone is incarcerated,
he cannot drive around on the roads.


firefly wrote:
Being aware of Thom's situation, and the repercussions he faces, might keep others from driving drunk.
How well does that work??
Is there mention, in an early page of this thread,
that another citizen of the same community was arrested for DUI, after Tom's misfortune was published ??
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Feb, 2012 08:56 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Over here Cameron is trying to get elected police chiefs despite widespread antipathy.
What 's the problem with that ????





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 Feb, 2012 09:07 pm
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:

firefly wrote:

Quote:
Over here you're either granted bail or held on remand based on flight risk, liklihood of witness intimidation and the seriousness of the crime. Money rarely comes into it.

The same is true here. But it might also include whether you might be a threat to the community if released on bail.

Money will only come into it if it increases the possibly you might be a flight risk, or, if you are so wealthy you could definitely afford to forfeit a lower bail and flee. So Bernie Madoff's $10 million bail (I think that was the amount), also took into account his resources, as well as the other factors.




In America justice = money. Period.
I guess Bear 's probably got Kennedy's suffocation of Mary Jo Kopechne in mind.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 03:47 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

izzythepush wrote:
Over here Cameron is trying to get elected police chiefs despite widespread antipathy.
What 's the problem with that ????


The money spent on the election, legislation etc. is money that is not being spent on policing. It's unnecessary, and nobody wants it.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 05:50 am
http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/133358/drunk_woman_hands_over_car


Drunk Woman Hands Over Car Keys to Boyfriend & Faces 30 Years in Prison for It!
Posted by Janelle Harris on February 21, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Comments (277)| Likes (52) .

Erin BrownShe probably thought she was doing the right thing. When 21-year-old Erin Brown was too wasted to drive her Toyota Scion home after a night out on the town, she gave the keys to her boyfriend, Trevor Bradshaw. Which would’ve been a responsible decision, except he was drunk too — and ended up hitting and killing two pedestrians as he swerved through the streets of Nashville. That’s tragic in and of itself.

But prosecutors are now dusting off a rarely used law to charge Brown with vehicular homicide right along with her man, citing that anyone who knowingly hands over their keys to an intoxicated person is just as liable for any damages as the individual behind the wheel. Now she’s facing 30 years in jail because she wasn’t astute enough in her drunkenness to realize that her boo was too tipsy to drive.

So what we’re basically saying here is that it was up to Brown to discern how far gone Bradshaw was rather than it being up to him to admit that he was too stewed to play chauffeur. Under that line of thinking, it must be a mugging victim’s fault for wearing a super snazzy handbag and tempting a renegade thief to steal it.

The sad fallout from their bad decision-making means two young men are now dead: Michael Brooksher, 22, and Tommy Allen, 23. The best friends both suffered injuries that killed them shortly after they were plowed down at 2:30 in the morning back in December. If the D.A.’s office has its way, this incident will also claim the lives of two more young people, with Brown and Bradshaw serving three decades behind bars, which puts them darn near in their golden years by the time they get out if they serve full sentences.

I’m not saying break out the violins and sad movie music for either of them, especially him. How many high school health classes and bad after school specials does someone have sit through before they get the message that driving drunk, bad; calling taxi, good? But I do think that, barring any idiotic new developments that confirm she was well aware of how inebriated her man actually was, prosecutors are trying — unnecessarily — to make an example out of her.

There are a lot of laws on the books that we all could be slapped with and long suffering because of. In New Jersey, cabbage can't be sold on Sunday, and in Missouri, a man must have a permit to shave. Yet we’re footloose and fancy-free when it comes to those rules. My point is, there are oodles of stupid, silly, downright foolish regulations that we don’t honor or observe. Why crank up this one?

Is Brown just as accountable as her boyfriend for the deaths?

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 06:30 am
@BillRM,
Maybe they should have decided who the designated driver was before they started getting drunk and damn the consequences. When I go out, if I take the car I stick to soft drinks, if I don't have the car I can drink. It's not rocket science.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 10:55 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Over here Cameron is trying to get elected police chiefs despite widespread antipathy.
OmSigDAVID wrote:
What 's the problem with that ????

izzythepush wrote:
The money spent on the election, legislation etc.
is money that is not being spent on policing.
It's unnecessary, and nobody wants it.
I woud prefer popular election of them.
I want him to be keenly aware (every minute that he is on-the-job)
that he owes his job to ME, as a citizen, not to a government,
but I must be aware that my remarks n my filosofy
come from a background of republicanism, not of monarchy,
in regard to which thay may not be equally appropriate.





David
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 11:10 am
@OmSigDAVID,
You might want to Dave, we don't. There's better things to be spending money on, and it politicises the police force.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 11:18 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/133358/drunk_woman_hands_over_car


Drunk Woman Hands Over Car Keys to Boyfriend & Faces 30 Years in Prison for It!
Posted by Janelle Harris on February 21, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Comments (277)| Likes (52) .

Erin BrownShe probably thought she was doing the right thing. When 21-year-old Erin Brown was too wasted to drive her Toyota Scion home after a night out on the town, she gave the keys to her boyfriend, Trevor Bradshaw. Which would’ve been a responsible decision, except he was drunk too — and ended up hitting and killing two pedestrians as he swerved through the streets of Nashville. That’s tragic in and of itself.

But prosecutors are now dusting off a rarely used law to charge Brown with vehicular homicide right along with her man, citing that anyone who knowingly hands over their keys to an intoxicated person is just as liable for any damages as the individual behind the wheel. Now she’s facing 30 years in jail because she wasn’t astute enough in her drunkenness to realize that her boo was too tipsy to drive.

So what we’re basically saying here is that it was up to Brown to discern how far gone Bradshaw was rather than it being up to him to admit that he was too stewed to play chauffeur. Under that line of thinking, it must be a mugging victim’s fault for wearing a super snazzy handbag and tempting a renegade thief to steal it.

The sad fallout from their bad decision-making means two young men are now dead: Michael Brooksher, 22, and Tommy Allen, 23. The best friends both suffered injuries that killed them shortly after they were plowed down at 2:30 in the morning back in December. If the D.A.’s office has its way, this incident will also claim the lives of two more young people, with Brown and Bradshaw serving three decades behind bars, which puts them darn near in their golden years by the time they get out if they serve full sentences.

I’m not saying break out the violins and sad movie music for either of them, especially him. How many high school health classes and bad after school specials does someone have sit through before they get the message that driving drunk, bad; calling taxi, good? But I do think that, barring any idiotic new developments that confirm she was well aware of how inebriated her man actually was, prosecutors are trying — unnecessarily — to make an example out of her.

There are a lot of laws on the books that we all could be slapped with and long suffering because of. In New Jersey, cabbage can't be sold on Sunday, and in Missouri, a man must have a permit to shave. Yet we’re footloose and fancy-free when it comes to those rules. My point is, there are oodles of stupid, silly, downright foolish regulations that we don’t honor or observe. Why crank up this one?

Is Brown just as accountable as her boyfriend for the deaths?
This raises some obvious Constitutional questions.
I earnestly, intensely wish that the Founders had included very severe
criminal penalties
against holders of public office (e.g., legislators n judges),
be thay federal, state or local, who violate the Constitutional Rights of the citizens,
as decided by a Special Court in defense of Pristine Orthodox Constitutional Purity,
the highest court in America.

If I had a time travel capability, I 'd do my best to convince them to do that.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 12:10 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
You might want to Dave, we don't.
What r the chances that it will HAPPEN ?



izzythepush wrote:
There's better things to be spending money on, and it politicises the police force.
Y do u say:
"There's better things. . . "
instead of there r better things, or
there are better things ???????





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 12:41 pm
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:
Whether or not Thom is being hurt is not relevant.
To WHAT is it "not relevant"??




Ragman wrote:
There has to be a deterrent to other heavy drinkers and potential drunk drivers from getting behind the wheel of any car.
IS there a "deterent" Ragman?
Will u tell us who it has deterred ?




Ragman wrote:
If a drunk driver law and subsequent appropriate penalty keeps drunk drivers off the road, then the law serves the public. As for Thom, I'd only guess and HOPE that the term he ends up serving will be an indelible lesson which might prevent him and others who know of this tragedy from ever driving drunk again.
If I remember accurately, one of the citizens of St. Pete
posted earlier in this thread that another of them
was arrested AFTER Tom & Barry's misfortunes became known.
How well do u think that law is working out??

Come to think of it:
I remember a few years ago when someone
(the head of the National Safety Council, or a similar group????)
was arrested for DUI, as he returned home from one of their safety events,
precipitating his resignation.

R we fighting human nature itself ??





David
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 12:47 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
R we fighting human nature itself ?


That much is obvious.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 01:19 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
it will deter Thom from killing anyone else for the duration of his sentence.

and I bet it works well...
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2012 01:25 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
It will happen, Cameron is ideology lead.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Can a thread be removed or locked? - Question by BeachBoy
dui - Question by sylvia chomas
Drinking and Driving Tip.... - Discussion by Slappy Doo Hoo
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/09/2025 at 07:30:23