@BillRM,
Quote:Sorry but he should had been taken to a mental hospital and given treatment just like if he was having a heart attack right by the roadway.
Are you talking about Thom? He was the obvious danger--he had been driving drunk, he hit someone and fatally injured him, and he didn't even stop his car. So, you feel they should have locked Thom in a mental hospital?
Quote:
But if you wish a legal reason yelling at cars and acting as he was acting is Disturbing the peace.
So you want to put a mentally ill man in jail for a few days for disturbing the peace? That's a good use of taxpayer's money? Whose peace was he disturbing beyond yours? Didn't he have the right to free speech?
Quote:We only found the "right" for mentally incompetent persons to refused treatment after we decided that they was not worth spending the funds on.
It was part of the civil rights movement. The mentally ill had been deprived of appropriate civil rights and civil liberties prior to that time.
Civilly incarcerating those who have not violated any criminal laws truly comes close to the actions of a police state. They used to do that in soviet Russia. Now you are advocating a police state?
The more you talk, the more inconsistent, illogical, and hypocritical you sound.