@BillRM,
Quote:I know you would love to live in a police state but we still have a few rights and one of them is not to talk to the police.
Sure, but then you can be subpoenaed to give testimony under oath. The police do have a right to try to obtain information regarding criminal matters, and, when
self-incrimination is not involved, there is an obligation to cooperate with a police investigation.
Once again, you apparently don't read, or don't understand, the material you yourself post.
Quote:However, in most common law jurisdictions, the right to remain silent allows any person questioned by police merely to refuse to answer questions posed by an investigator without giving any reason for doing so. (In such a case,
the investigators may subpoena the witness to give testimony under oath in court, though the witness may then exercise their Fifth Amendment rights if they believe their answer may serve to incriminate themselves).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice
Quote:Who know if some DA is looking to make a name for himself by finding a way to charge the bartenders or not.
Idiot, the bartenders really can't be charged under laws that do not exist. If Florida was interested in going after bartenders, they'd have dram shop laws to that effect.
I've never been afraid to talk to the police when they were investigating a criminal matter, and I've done that several times, and I didn't have to consult my attorney first.
But, then I don't worry about having to heavily encrypt my computer so the police can't find evidence of child porn, nor do I have to worry about all the other things that trouble you about what the police might find out about you.
A guilty conscience needs no accuser, do they, BillRM--you need to be preoccupied with concealing information because you have something to hide.
You think like a criminal. If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck...