@BillRM,
Quote:So you posted articles from people calling for lower limits even a zero limit on BAC and yet you do not wish for a lower limit then .08!!!!!!!!
I never posted anything calling for a legal BAC level of zero.
But, in the case of the other articles, I thought they were interesting articles worthy of discussion. Did I say that I agreed with the articles or that they reflected my views when I posted them? I felt they provided food for thought. I think food for thought is important. That doesn't mean I am promoting or advocating anything.
Some of us actually like to discuss issues, BillRM, all aspects of the issues, and that involves seriously considering other points of view--something you are too narrow-minded to even comprehend. You fixate on one position and relentlessly repeat it over and over and over, without sufficiently considering other aspects, or conflicting views, and that seems to be the case with you, no matter what the topic is. And that's why people can't engage in anything approximating a real discussion with you--there is no real interchange or exchange of ideas with you, you just keep reiterating your same few points over and over and over. That's not a discussion. It's not even a debate. It's just boring repetition.
I'm not bashful about expressing my opinions, dummy. If I wanted a legal BAC level below .08, I'd say so.
And that info about Jason Kidd you've just come up with was in the news stories and articles I previously posted about him. I also described him as "falling-down drunk".
He might well wind up going to jail.