Pepper Spray Police policy: It's OK if threat's 'imminent,' not in nonviolent protests.

Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2011 11:46 am
November 25, 2011
Police policy: It's OK if threat's 'imminent,' not in nonviolent protests.
By Tim Funk
Nov. 25, 2011

If Charlotte-Mecklenburg police follow their rules, they won't resort to pepper spray if confronted with nonviolent protesters at next year's Democratic National Convention.

CMPD "directives," or rules that guide police behavior, also say that OC spray - short for oleoresin capsicum, the formal name for pepper spray - should not be used unless there's "an imminent threat" to the officer or to someone's safety.

When police should and should not use this aerosol irritant, which can cause temporary blindness, coughing and a restriction in breathing, has become the subject of national debate with the rise of the Occupy Wall Street movement - and law enforcement's reaction to it.

Police in New York, Denver, Seattle and Portland, Ore., have been widely criticized for trying to control Occupy crowds by using the spray, which gets its power from an inflammatory agent found naturally in cayenne and many other kinds of pepper.

But the incident that caused the most outrage - and disciplinary action against the officers involved - happened Nov. 18 on the campus of the University of California-Davis. As captured on video now watched by millions on the Internet, campus police Lt. John Pike doused a group of Occupy protesters - all of them seated, with arms linked - with a bright orange pepper spray compound.

In Charlotte, City Council member Patrick Cannon, who chairs the council's Public Safety Committee, said he had two reactions when he saw the video: Disbelief at what he was watching, and relief that, if the rules are followed, it won't happen in Charlotte.

"Our policy is written as such that we do not deploy (pepper spray) on passive demonstrators," said Cannon, a Democrat.

But what does "passive" mean?

CMPD Capt. Jeff Estes said the directives would also prohibit spraying demonstrators even if they refused, nonviolently, to follow orders to disperse.

Their refusal would have to include "violence or riotous behavior," Estes said. Anything short of that "would be a trespassing issue" that would not call for using pepper spray, he said.

When 35,000 people - including protesters - converge on Charlotte next September for the convention, a host of police officers from other cities' forces will also be in town to assist CMPD.

All of these guest officers "will be bound by all the rules of engagement and use of force" that govern the CMPD, Estes said.

Any chance that those rules will be changed before the Democrats meet?

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police wouldn't comment, but it's doubtful, given all the legal ramifications.

Along with all the delegates and protesters in town for the convention, there will be up to 15,000 representatives of the news media, who could quickly turn any local police misconduct into an international story with a Charlotte dateline.

Also keeping an eye on police treatment of protesters next year will be the American Civil Liberties Union.

"We're going to be watching very closely to make sure the First Amendment rights of protesters are protected," said Mike Meno, spokesman for ACLU in North Carolina.

Police in Tampa - site of the Republican National Convention - will also get closer-than-normal scrutiny as protesters gather and march.

Tampa police policy on use of pepper spray is similar to CMPD's. There, police can spray demonstrators only as a defensive weapon.

Pepper spray, the Tampa policy says, "shall not be used to disperse or control crowds."

Developed into weapons-grade material by the FBI in the 1980s, pepper spray is now widely used by hikers to deter bears and women to foil would-be attackers.

But it's police use of the spray that has provoked the most comment - some of it satirical.

After the UC-David video of Lt. Pike spraying the protesters went viral, many created their own digital versions, with "Pike," for example, spraying the stone face of Thomas Jefferson atop Mount Rushmore.

"This is a new generation of subduing people," Robert Thompson, a professor of popular culture at Syracuse University told The New York Times. "And while the decision to use it may not be right, we are in the age of pepper spray, not the age of bullets."

In 2008, police at both national political conventions - in St. Paul, Minn., and Denver, Colo. - used pepper spray, according to news reports.

During the GOP convention in St. Paul, CNN reported, police arrested 283 people after firing projectiles, pepper spray and tear gas to disperse a crowd demonstrating near the convention site.

And in Denver, where the Democrats met, a Jefferson County, Colo., deputy unleashed pepper spray on the first night of the convention, the Denver Post reported. Only later did the deputy discover that the "protesters" he was spraying were actually undercover Denver police officers. The New York Times and the St. Petersburg Times contributed.

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/11/25/2803181/spraying-protesters-unlikely-in.html#ixzz1ejxch8io
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,206 • Replies: 0
No top replies


Related Topics

Protests in Brazil - Discussion by ossobuco
Protests Around The World - Discussion by RexRed
Peaceful Demonstrations - Discussion by Brandon9000
Snipers in Ecuador - Discussion by edgarblythe
The Statue Wars Begin - Discussion by edgarblythe
Hamburg - Discussion by ossobucotemp
A Day Without Immigrants - Question by Sturgis
  1. Forums
  2. » Pepper Spray Police policy: It's OK if threat's 'imminent,' not in nonviolent protests.
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/17/2021 at 02:46:44