12
   

Did I shave my legs for this?

 
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2011 10:58 am
@ehBeth,
Not a heck of alot different than waxing I suppose.
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 06:50 am
http://static.tapastic.com/cartoons/7d/d3/d0/ce/6cfdc5944baf4cd9b4c6e2db9ae7508a.jpg
http://tapastic.com/episode/33789
0 Replies
 
nurein
 
  0  
Reply Mon 30 Jun, 2014 03:41 am
Laser treatment is one of the most good one and they are effective too at a as they leave an best results.
0 Replies
 
Marinones
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jan, 2015 03:29 am
@boomerang,
Sounds fine.
0 Replies
 
trendzmania
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2015 11:14 am
@boomerang,
no u must not shave your legs u can use hair remover or consult any expert in this field it many be a beautician
0 Replies
 
coluber2001
 
  2  
Reply Fri 3 Apr, 2015 12:34 pm
It's interesting that various cultures have extreme biases toward body hair. Pre-Colombian Aztecs frowned on body hair, because they didn't have much, I suppose. When they were conquered by the hairy Spaniards, they changed their tune, and hairy bodies were in. I believe the anti-indian bias in Mexico has its roots, or at least a reinforcement, based on the hairlessness of Mexican Indians.

In the Third Reich it was the opposite. The ideal German was a six foot, blue-eyed blonde. And the less hairy the better. Some of the hatred of the Slavs (Russians) was their swarthy and hairy appearance. Regarding this bias, Clive James sarcastically states that the Germans spent millions trying to prove that the Japanese (allied with Germany) were six foot, blue-eyed blondes in disguise.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/26/2022 at 02:32:33