I hate conspiracy theories do you?

Which is why I have "No comment" on my being involved in the attack on the towers.

So let me try and get this straight," You expect me to believe that your "No comment" comment on being involved in the attack on the towers is suppose to justify your involvement in all the deaths that occurred?

No comment

Another tactic of those involved in a conspiracy is to try to demonize anyone that points out that conspiracy by implying those asking questions are worse than anything they might be doing.

(More conspiracy.. Spell check in Mozilla won't recognize "demonize" as a word.)

Is that why you were demonizing me to begin with?

Which conspiracy were you accusing me of being involved in before I pointed out your being involved in one?

I did not accuse you of being involved in one but when I gave you an example of what I thought you were implying you seemed as if you had something to hide!

I am just questioning how a conspirator's mind works, "That's all!

A conspirators mind is so complex it conspires to conspire upon the conspirational background...its a self entangling black hole !

I guess that I will never figure him out!

The conspiracy to replace all posters that have chimps reading the paper on the bog, and replace them with posters of babies reading the paper on the bog.

In sum the conspirators mind is very much the schizophrenic mind...it overcomplicates by seeing more patterns then the patterns that actually exist or are there to be seen...remember shining (the movie) ?

I am just trying to get back on topic about how conspiracies are used to confuse the masses into believing that the status quo is the best way forward and the many other uses of conspiracies!

This next video will really piss off those who are emotionally attached to their traditions and want to keep forwarding their traditions!

We are all guilty of this and it seems to be psychological But is it the most logical choice for you? Are you empirically sure about your answer? Am I? No! I am not even sure about the question being asked!

That's one conspiracy theory!

I think that I watched all 3 parts 3 hours of the video that you shared and it does seem that it tries to get it correct!


What do you thin about this one?

This is something new to me! I have been hearing stories that I think are conspiracy theories but none the less I do check them out at times.


I found this professor making a possible claim and it does not appear to me that he is out of his mind but I do need to do some more research on his psyche to get a better idea!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

Lovely pictures but no "molten" metal in any of them.

Molten metal doesn't hold together when picked up as in the first picture. In fact steel turns red at 900F, long before it melts at 2500F.


The next 2 pictures have been examined several times and are NOT metal but work lights being used by the workers. There is no molten metal in those pictures. Not even hot metal.

The only molten steel on the site was from iron workers cutting steel apart as they dug through the rubble. Any other claim is completely bogus. Even the statements by the firemen don't claim "molten metal" 1500 degrees isn't molten steel. "Red hot" metal isn't molten and we don't know if he is referring to metal that was just cut by a torch.

The "molten" metal at WTC 7 was lead which melts at 600F.

I suspect that you are part of a grand conspiracy to discourage conspiracy theories. And I hate it.

I agree!

I still like to learn about this stuff!
Isn't it time that we use physical science instead of political science?