25
   

Terror in Norway: Shootout, bomb explosions kill 11

 
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 09:40 am
@izzythepush,
IzzythePOOP:

Quote:
You're such a moronic knucklescraper, you think rape is confined solely to moslem males.


In Norway it actually is.
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 09:54 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

IzzythePOOP:

Oh snap! You've just been served, Izzy! Gunga , the guy who (after some trial and error) came up with "Bork Obunga, "has devised another devastatingly witty nickname, and this time it's for you! I'm not sure how you'll survive -- Obama still hasn't recovered from the merciless taunting he gets here on a regular basis from GungasnaKKKe.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:13 am
@joefromchicago,
I'm going to have to try very hard to put the remnants of my tattered life together.
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:20 am
@gungasnake,
Non-western males are not Islamic. Only in the hate blogs of Pamela Geller is that necessary and sufficient.

Rap
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:21 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
How many people have been gunned down by rampaging members of the NRA?
So far as I know,
the answer is ZERO.
However, in contemplation of the fact that many millions of Americans
have been NRA members since its origin in the 18OOs,
I must allow for the possiblity that some of them might have gone astray.
When I joined, about 5O years ago, I had to submit a recommendation
for membership from an NRA member. (I did not approve of that.)
Since then, I 've also recommended fellows for membership.

Incidentally, note that the US Supreme Court has vindicated
the philosophical position of the NRA in the case of
D.C. v. HELLER 554 US 290; 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008)
and again in McDONALD v. CHICAGO, 561 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3020 (2010)




izzythepush wrote:
Isn't it time that the NRA be declared a terrorist organisation?
Yes, it is NOT. Chaotic foolishness there, Pushy;
I don 't think that 's what the US Supreme Court had in mind.





izzythepush wrote:
It's far more effective than Al-Qaida.
That is a very stupid thing to say; its also unduly ignorant.
U shoud be ashamed of yourself for saying that (but I kinda like u a little bit).





David
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:23 am
@raprap,
I've had a few arguments with some of the right-wing posters on this forum, but only Gunga is loathsome enough to insult the victims of this muderous rampage, by labelling them 'Libtards.' I may not agree with Finn and David, but at least they've shown some respect for the dead.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:24 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I sort of like you too a bit Dave. At least you say what you think.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:41 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
The figures speak for themselves.
David wrote:
because the English police have cooked the books
to make gun control look good


izzythepush wrote:
Rubbish, NRA propaganda.
No, Pushy, its not NRA propaganda.
A few years ago, I attended the annual meeting of NRA
and an Englishman addressed us. (Not being American,
it seems unlikely that he was an NRA member.)
He told us of the newly retired London police official
who resented being coerced into altering earlier accounting
procedures to make gun control look good; for instance, subsequent
mass crimes at the same place with mulitple felonies
of various categories committed against multiple victims
were required to be counted as only ONE crime.

I wish that I had recorded his name.
He offered us names and dates in his presentation,
but I was not taking notes.





izzythepush wrote:
Nobody over here is complaining that police figures are cooked.
Really? I'm not sure about that.
Lemme go thru some English newspaper stories that I have
to see whether thay address that point or not. I 'm not sure.
I DO remember that thay concern an upsurge in violent crime
in England, since your more severe recent gun control.





izzythepush wrote:
It's only in America where the figures blow the NRAs claims out of the water
WHICH "claims" are those, Mr. Push???




izzythepush wrote:
that people make up such mad bollocks.
I don 't know what bollocks are,
but note that NRA people in America are not mad
since the US Supreme Court vindicated the NRA position
qua defensive freedom in the HELLER case in 2OO8.
On the CONTRARY, we are VERY HAPPY!!!!! JUBILANT!

Admittedly, some of us were kind of mad about getting screwed
out of our 2nd Amendment rights BEFORE the HELLER decision was issued, but not any more.


izzythepush wrote:
Why don't you tell us the name of your source and post a link to his page?
I 'll see if I can dig it out by research; there is a chance.




izzythepush wrote:
I think it's because he's fictional.
What u think has no (retroactive) effect upon the fact of the matter.





David
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 10:55 am
@OmSigDAVID,
What someone spouts at a meeting is hearsay, not evidence. I've heard some amazing things down the pub. Apparantly our queen is a shape changing lizard. Would you Adam and Eve it?

The claim is that the NRA makes your society safer. I feel freer knowing my neighbours are not armed.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 11:00 am
@izzythepush,
IzzythePOOP:

Quote:
I've had a few arguments with some of the right-wing posters on this forum, but only Gunga is loathsome enough to insult the victims of this muderous rampage, by labelling them 'Libtards.


Where?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 11:05 am
@gungasnake,
Here,
Quote:
One difference, I view firearms as for hunting (game animals) and declared wars only, and not for murder... I'd have found some other way get the libtards' attention.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 11:20 am
@izzythepush,

IzzythePOOP:

Quote:
@gungasnake,
Here,
Quote:
One difference, I view firearms as for hunting (game animals) and declared wars only, and not for murder... I'd have found some other way get the libtards' attention.


Your claim, Poop, was that I had called the VICTIMS libtards while the quote you now produce in evidence clearly does not amount to that and in fact logically to get the attention of dead people I would need a medium or somebody like the "witch of Endor" with a familiar spirit capable of communing with the dead; the quote clearly refers to the leaders of the ruling Norwegian libtard party as libtards.

Learn to read.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 11:38 am
@gungasnake,
You know what you meant. 'I'd have found,' is in the past tense. The problem is I can read, and so can the other posters. You're just a pathetic little racist who's sick posts make the shooter's comments look moderate in comparison.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 11:46 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:
; the quote clearly refers to the leaders of the ruling Norwegian libtard party as libtards.


What party, gunga, do you think to be "the ruling Norwegian libtard party"?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 11:52 am
@Walter Hinteler,
He's trying to wriggle out of it. He's saying, only the leaders of the Labour party are 'Libtards,' not the young members gunned down. It doesn't make sense, either they all are, or none of them are. You can't have it both ways.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 12:12 pm
@izzythepush,
Well, but the Socialist Left Party ("Sosialistisk Venstreparti") would be the "Libtards" - and they are a member of the Norwegian government as well ...
(They've only a European affiliation, together with other Scandinavian 'Libtards' they form the "Nordic Green Left Alliance".)
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 12:35 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
What someone spouts at a meeting is hearsay, not evidence.
1. We are not in a court of law.
2. He said that he came to the meeting, from England,
to alert us to this alarming state of affairs in England,
that nothing like that happen in America.
He carried a message from England from the retired English police official.


izzythepush wrote:
I've heard some amazing things down the pub. Apparantly our queen is a shape changing lizard.
Would you Adam and Eve it?
I have no idea what that means.



izzythepush wrote:
The claim is that the NRA makes your society safer.
Yes, but its MORE than that, Pushy.
The point is that anyone has the Natural Right
(and in America, the Constitutional Right) to defend himself
from man or beast, if the need arises.
Interfering with his defensive rights is EVIL,
in complicity with the predator, the wolf in the chicken coop.
We do not pay taxes to have our natural rights violated.




izzythepush wrote:
I feel freer knowing my neighbours are not armed.
Your emotions do not justify making your countrymen helpless in the face of predatory violence.





David
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 12:42 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Your emotions do not justify making my neighbours less safe. My views on gun ownership aren't at all fringe. Over here they are solidly mainstream. The 'policeman' you're describing is obviously a right wing nutter, I'd take everything he said with a pinch of salt. Did he say 'Evenin' All?'
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 12:48 pm
@izzythepush,
He'd certainly had said "David, my dear" in that case.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Jul, 2011 12:50 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
I'm sure he would.
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 11:29:54