@izzythepush,
More stupidity from izzythepush.
Beck is one of "my own?"
Really?
The fact that I consider him a "narcissistic kook," apparently escaped your comprehension.
That I acknowledged his remarks would understandably be offensive to those who actually have a real stake in this tragedy also seems to have escaped your comprehension.
I'm sorry if I don't share the scope of your sanctimony. I'm not offended by remarks that have no personal connection to me and mine. I'm sure this is because I am not, like you, a humanist world citizen who not only cries for all who are injured but takes angry offense at any boorish comment that may be uttered. Yes, izzy you are far the better man than I, because you offend so easily and so often.
I registered my displeasure with Beck's comments, but apparently that is not good enough for you. Instead I should have denounced him as a hate-monger and called for his head. Apparently, such is the only reaction that might verify that I can tell the difference between right and wrong. Sorry, izzy but I'm not about to allow your hyperbolic partisanship define morality for me.
Your response precisely reflects the huge flaw in your perspective, because by obvious extension you wish to assign Breivik as "one of my own" as well. This has been and will continue to be the aim of you and those "of your own" who wish to use this tragedy to advance their political prejudices.
There is everything rational and nothing desperate about pointing out that there is as much evidence that Brievik was influence by the people I cited as he was by Mark Steyn, Daniel Pipes, Theodore Dalyrymple and Melanie Phillips. All of the individuals named were quoted in Brievik's manifesto, but apparently you have the smarts to recognize which sources he corrupted and which he had spot on.
You believe Beck is a "peddler of hate." Be that as it may, he was never quoted or referenced by Brievik, while Gandhi, Shaw, Jefferson et al were. So how do you explain his utilization of sources that you might respect, if not revere?
I know, it's simple. He's crazy. It's obvious, at least to you and "your own," that citing Gandhi in a manifesto promoting violence is crazy while citing Steyn makes perfect sense.
You know, my head may be stuck well up my arse, but I prefer that possibility to your reality in which your head is stuck far up the ass of whatever Progressive guru is telling you how to think.
As for true desperation one need only refer to your incredibly lame rejoinder about Cheney.