Are atheists being more illogical than agnostics?

The Easter Bunny is a fantasy character depicted as a rabbit bringing Easter eggs.

How did you prejudge that the Easter Bunny is a fantasy character undeserving of agnosticism? How did you prejudge that Jehova is more than that?

hes a damn anti bunnyite.

Frank Apisa wrote:

The Easter Bunny is a fantasy character depicted as a rabbit bringing Easter eggs.

You mean, a fantasy character just like Jehova? The Easter bunny is a character in venerable Germanic lore, just as Jehova is a character in venerable Judeo/Christio/Islamic lore. How did you prejudge that the Easter Bunny is a fantasy character undeserving of agnosticism? How did you prejudge that Jehova is more than that? What makes you so firm in your a-easterbunnyism?

Quote:

How did you prejudge that the Easter Bunny is a fantasy character undeserving of agnosticism? How did you prejudge that Jehova is more than that?

deserves a curtain call

Many years ago, in Portal Star's thread on agnostics, I asked Frank why he accorded more importance to the question of whether or not there is a god than he did to the question of the existence of other supernatural characters. In a fit of honesty, never since repeated, he replied that he didn't know.

Let me get this straight:

If it doesn't serve your argument, Frank, it must be an atheistic way of avoiding uncomfortable truth? Am I correct?

The comparison between god and the easter bunny is perfectly valid.

And BOTH are defined in the dictionary. Both have magical powers. Both of their existences would fly in the face of most observable science.

Just because you don't like an argument doesn't mean it isn't perfectly valid.

The reason theists, deists, wannabe socratics (like you), etc. hate the easter bunny/santa claus argument is because there is no good retort to it.

Sure Bubba, a rhetorical warrior such as you can have no flaws.

As nearly as i can tell, that was the first time you were asked that question, and you only later realized the pitfalls of such honesty on your part.

I've already looked that up and quoted that for you, not long after your most recent return.

I'm not your errand boy, Bubba. If you want to defend that remark, look it up and provide the context youreslf.

Oh, poor abused, misunderstood Frank--i asked the question, you replied as i stated, exactly as i stated.

I made that remark in response to what others here are saying, i don't give a **** if you want to imply that i'm lying, or even to call me a liar.

Name-calling is always your resort of refuge when you can't do any better--and of course, lately, you've been doing a lot of shouting.

I don't give a **** what happened at abuzz, what happened here is that i asked you why you consider the question of whether or not there is a god is more important than the question of other supernatural beings, and you said you didn't know.

Get over it.

If you're so calm and happy, why are you shouting again?

You should get some anger management training, that's got to be hell on your blood pressure. Calm down, Frank, learn to take it easy.