0
   

four groups of 80 engineered alterations

 
 
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2011 06:24 pm

Are "four groups of 80 engineered alterations " referred to "four groups, each with 80 engineered alterations"?


Context:

Eager to share their enabling technology, the team published their results as CAGE reached the semifinal round. Results suggested that the final four strains were healthy, even as the team assembled four groups of 80 engineered alterations into stretches of the chromosome surpassing 1 million DNA base pairs. "We encountered a great deal of skepticism early on that we could make so many changes and preserve the health of these cells," Carr said. "But that's what we've seen."

More:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110714142130.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 455 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Jul, 2011 05:46 pm
@oristarA,
The question solved.
The thread is closed.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » four groups of 80 engineered alterations
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 02:23:30