@maxdancona,
You're wrong in a general sense.
Perhaps some of the people you have heard or (more accurately) noticed talking about patriotism
are looking to exclude others, but it is a sweeping generalization to assert that everyone who speaks of patriotism is looking to exclude one group or another.
This seems to me to be a pretty obvious fact and yet you keep returning to your sweeping generalization as if it were definitive.
Obviously I am not going to persuade you are wrong.
You have made a mental connection between the world "patriotism" and characteristics you find repulsive, and I'm not about to set your straight.
Your challenge is absurd.
It will, almost assuredly, lead to you challenging me on the people I might cite as working to bring together
all Americans.
Who do you know that is working to bring together
all Americans and how do you know they don't consider themselves patriots?
What exactly does bringing together
all Americans mean? Do you include illegal immigrants in that set? How about criminals? Would you find a person’s unifying efforts to be lacking if it excluded racists or Christian fundamentalists?
I don't keep track of whether or not people call themselves patriots, and I am not about to try and find all of the well known people who have.
The only people of which I am aware who
consistently speak of being a patriot are Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, and while I doubt they will agree with you that they are not seeking to unify Americans, they are hardly the only two people in the country who call themselves patriots. I will acknowledge though that I find their penchant for using the P-Word silly.
I consider myself a patriot, but I admit that I am not working to unify
all Americans. I don't think one requires the other. I'm pretty sure that you would never call yourself a patriot, but are you working to unify
all Americans?
Clearly you are defining "patriotism" based on its usage by people with whom you do not agree and even find distasteful (better keep that in check if you're going to unify us all).
It means love and devotion to one's country, but you have weighed it down will all sorts of personal issues.
I concede you will never agree with me, but it's quite obvious that a shared love and devotion to a country is unifying.
It's unifying, even if you wish to view the emotion as nothing more than a genetically programmed, tribalistic reflex. That is why a propensity for tribalism evolved in humans.
People such as yourself who find tribalism, and by extension nationalism, so distasteful simply want to enlarge the tribe; enlarge the nation so that it includes everyone.
This is fanciful, or at least it is today and has been for the entire length of human history.
Resources, for humans, have always been finite. Perpetuation of the species has been best served by banding together in relatively small sub-sets and in a unified way compete with other bands for what is available. If all the hominids in pre-historic Africa were blessed with your consciousness, they would have sought to join together as one single band, and then starved together.
What is this obsession with us all
getting together?
I'm quite sure that a very large group of people would have to alter their fundamental beliefs in order to meet your requirements for grand unification. Unless there are no absolutely no exceptions for your unifying design, it will simply be a matter of them trading their exceptions for yours... if they crave your acknowledging unity with them.
Love and devotion for one's country will lead to a division between groups unless everyone lives in the same country, however there's nothing wrong with divisiveness per se.
There are few groups more homogenous than professional athletes, and yet their livelihood is dependent upon division, not unity. Of course sports teams are not trying to kill one another, but they are competing with each other for limited resources. Not only is it not so horrible a state of affairs, it’s what makes so many of us enjoy watching them.
I think you need to examine your thoughts on patriotism. It is not nationalism, and it certainly is not jingoism, and because some folks who you find noxious and who you believe are nationalist or jingoists, call themselves patriots, shouldn't mean a row of beans to you.