@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
As i pointed out before, your personal disappointment with how the government worked doesn't constitute evidence of contradiction. As i also pointed out before, i'll continue to call you an idiot, with wonderful and self-evident justification, for as long as you respond to my posts with your typical drivel.
Oh ya... My disappoinment...
People had to fight a civil war in this country, fight for civil equality, and fight even for the right to organize into labor unions because the government did not work, and never did mean to accomplish the goals it set before the people as a bill of goods, and you think my complaint has something to do with personal disappointment... You are an idiot... And the document is a god damned lie, and it is for that reason that the results are never compared to the stated goal of the constitution...
It is impossible for the people to change the constitution in any meaningful fashion... It is easy for the rich who run the government to get around it... To call it a contradiction is as much a damned understatement as calling you an idiot... You are by far the most educated idiot I have ever run across... Are you like that rainman, who had to be dressed every day by his father until he died??? Pull up you pants stupid, and join the human race!!!
Setthere; Why don't you look at how the Supreme Court attacked every successful method of organized labor... Each one was judged unconstitutional because they were in comflict with property rights... I have never seen a good, or accurate definition of property rights... I do know the goods listed in the preamble can be shared alike by all human beings, and that each qualifies as being of the pursuit of happiness put forward in our founding document, by Jefferson... There is a huge difference in my opinion between those rights claimed by all people because they cannot live without them, and those rights given to property which has nothing what ever to do with the welfare of a people, their nation, or of humanity...
The rights of property serve only a few, and ever less since they are not equal, but cummulative... Those with the most property have the most rights, and rights are powers, and that power makes them more than equal to those with less property, and to those with no property... This whole land, our commonwealth is going into the pockets of the rich, and this people is even now being asked to sacrifice its rights so that the rich may hold forever that part of our property it has made its own... And we must still support their rights, and defend them, and their property when they contribute nothing to the general welfare... If the preamble was ever more than lies, it is the government which must find some balance, but they are all a part of that class trying to protect their private piece of the commonwealth, and telling us to do with less... The constitution is no protection of our rights, or recognition of our needs... It is a failed document and always was... Its lies are too bold to any longer conceal...