@Cyracuz,
David wrote:R u alleging that the sought after Unified Field Theory DENIES the Big Bang ??
I am not aware that it does.
Cyracuz wrote:No. Just that it might shift where big bang theory fits in.
Fits into
WHAT??
The Big Bang Theory (inferred from the observed expansion of the Universe)
IS the theory of the source of
EVERYTHING in this Universe;
(i.e., matter & energy [which r the same thing, like ice and water] plus time & space, which continue to expand).
If I remember accurately: comprehended within
ENERGY r
:
the strong force, the weak force, gravity and electromagnetism.
Cyracuz wrote:Now it is seen as the most comprehensive cosmological models,
U
are aware that the Unified Field Theory is only a work-in-progress, not yet achieved, right ??
Cyracuz wrote:but scientists are learning new secrets about reality all the time,
and I think it would be naive to assume that the big bang theory will never be obsolete.
To me, that seems an
odd way to express it (meaning no disrespect).
David wrote:Because matter is full of big holes; is that what u had in mind ?
Cyracuz wrote:If my eyes could detect light in x ray spectre many things that are solid to me at the moment
would appear transparent. If my body wasn't heavier than air, I would be floating through it,
perhaps unwillingly drifting upwards like a helium balloon.
Yes; as we do when we swim in water, fully submerged.
Cyracuz wrote: Wouldn't this change my perception of what is solid and not?
When I 've swum in water, fully submerged,
I 've had no illusions of being less than solid.
That did not occur to me.
David