I have not seen any data either way
Meaning you have nothing
to support your contention that women fail in leadership positions more often than men. It is simply a view you hold, based on your own bias and negative appraisals of women. It is more of your BS. More hot air.
when the feminists dont want questions asked they have been sometimes been very successful in shutting down all conversation and all investigation by science into the matter. I will not be bullied, I will not be silenced by the imposed lack of data and lack of documentation.
Who said that anyone here doesn't want certain questions asked? You're the one who doesn't want certain questions asked--like where's the data to support your assumptions?
This has nothing to do with feminists. Why are you even introducing the subject of feminists into this topic?
made statements, about women, you
are the one who should be able to back them up with evidence. The first person in this thread who asked you to back up your statements regarding women in CEO/leadership positions was ragman. You didn't respond to him either.
No one is bullying you, or trying to silence you. Stop playing the victim.
But, if you continue to make sweeping, generalized statements, such as
What I do know is that we seem to be seeing a rate of failure of women in leadership positions that is higher than for men.
You should be prepared to back that statement up--to support it with some concrete data or some objective measure, some evidence. Otherwise, your statement is meaningless, and it cannot become part of any reasonable or serious discussion because there is no way of evaluating the validity, or truth, of your
premise. Did you just pull it out of thin air? Did you just make it up?
I will not be silenced by the imposed lack of data and lack of documentation.
All that means is that you will continue to shoot your mouth off and continue to make unfounded statements that have no basis in fact, and that might have no connection to reality. Glad you are so up front about that, Hawkeye. You are broadcasting a BS alert.
You're the one who shuts down conversation. You're the one who doesn't want to answer questions.
In this case, you're not expressing anything except your own personal bias regarding women. And you have nothing to back it up. No one is silencing you, but why would anyone want to listen to you?