@parados,
parados wrote:
Quote:Card check would this enable the majority in a 50% sample of the workers (i.e. something over 25% of the total) to unionize a company or plant. Please explain the public benefit of this procedure, compared to the current requirement of a secret ballot with a majority of the total population voting for a union.
No. Are you really this ignorant? Or are you just so blinded by your opinion that facts don't matter.
More than 50% of ALL employees must sign cards in support of the union. It can't be done with only 25% for the union.
Let me try to explain it slowly for you. A 50% sample of (say) 40 workers is 20 workers. A majority of that number is anything over 10. 10 is 25% of 40. Thus anything over 25% of the workers could forcibly unionize all the workers in a company.
A triumph of contemporary democracy.
Even with the variants that would require all submitted cards to favor unionization, most provide for minority rule in that less than a 50% sample is required. The comparitive opportunity for thuggery asnd intimidation at the hands of both union and management is nearly eliminated by secret ballot. Why do anything to abolish that? Please answer that question.
I'm waiting for your explanation of the public benefit associated with this legislation and the bad features of the current rule (majority vote in a secret ballot) that it will cure. The only defect of the present system I am aware of is the unions usually loose in secret ballots.
The simple truth is card check is designed to make union chicanery easier and to reverse a 40 year trend of workers voluntarily rejecting forced unionization in secret ballots.