Reply
Wed 9 Feb, 2011 06:49 pm
Story Published: Feb 9, 2011 at 3:00 PM MST
CHEYENNE, Wyo.
(AP) — Wyoming residents would be able to carry concealed guns
without a license under a bill that's
set for a hearing before a legislative committee.
The House Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and
Cultural Resources Committee is scheduled
to hear the bill on Wednesday morning.
The bill is sponsored by Casper Republican
Senator Kit Jennings and already has cleared the Senate.
If the bill ultimately becomes law, Wyoming
would join Alaska, Arizona and Vermont as states
that don't require citizens to have licenses
to carry concealed weapons.
Supporters of the Wyoming bill say the state
and federal constitutions guarantee the people's
right to carry guns. They also say criminals
commonly disregard gun laws.
Opponents of the bill say they're worried about
putting more guns into hands of people who
shouldn't have them.
[All emfasis has been exultantly added by David.]
This is kinda like watching the fall of the Wall in Berlin,
with all of the communist slave states quickly getting their freedom after much too long in slavery.
David
If too many future victims r too well armed,
then it is too dangerous to be a violent criminal,
but not as much fun.
David
Here is a nice case to which the USSC has lovingly cited
with approval in D.C. v. Heller 554 US 290; 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008)
The USSC says the following:
" In Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846), the Georgia Supreme Court
construed the Second Amendment as
protecting the “natural right of self-defence”
and therefore struck down a ban on carrying pistols openly.
Its opinion perfectly captured the way in which the operative clause
[i.e.: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"]
of the Second Amendment furthers the purpose announced in
the prefatory clause, [i.e., the militia clause]
in continuity with the English right:
“The right of the whole people,
old and young, men, women and boys,
and not militia only,
to keep and bear arms of every description,
and not such merely as are used by the militia,
shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon,
in the smallest degree;
and all this for the important end to be attained:
the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia,
so vitally necessary to the security of a free State.
Our opinion is, that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant
to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right . . . ”
[All emphasis has been joyfully added by David.]