@FBM,
Quote: H. sapiens sapiens is much less than 1 million years old. You have stumbled upon a flake-fest.
This is merely a Creation fest. (some people would argue that there is not much difference between the two). Their argument here is that " because of this discovery evolution i s knocked into a cocked hat". You see,weve "Falsified" one of the key "beliefs " of evolutionism (the religion of evolution), That belief being that all life developed from genera trhat appeared in a sequence through time and that mammal or human fossils would never EVER be found in the deeper time sediments of the Paleozoic. SO here the Creation "scientists" assert that theyve found a fossil that disproves that sequence. (Of course, I woulda hidden the hammer-although I would agree that Plumb is a very old name, I am , however, most certain that there werent too many Plumb Hammers made in the pAleozoic).
This falsification attempt succeeds (if true) to discount
1That humans did live in the mid CArboniferous along with other less advanced life forms
2HAving cast doubt on the sequences of lifes appearnce, the Creationists then try to assert that actually these sediments arennt as old as the Geologists say.
The two prinicple apologists for these fossils and what they stand for, have been trying this scam since the mid 1990's and there are several dozen other "dead" websites that have presented evidence of such "fossils" . The point isnt so much to try to advance science as it is to take a stand by counting on thescience community ignoring these specimens and, by ignoring them, allowing this crap to be continued.
There has been no credible evidence to support these findings . All the bones presented so far are either not bones at all or are brecciated animal bones found in gangue piles near coal mine dumps and the soil REDOX conditions have allowed the deposition of SIderite crusts on the bone matrix.