@Lash,
Lash wrote:
(smiling) It is ok with me if no one here will give it credence. This is largely a partisan-aligned, fingers in ears group. (but, smiling again) It's enough for me to know ....you know it's true.
No - I'm telling you 1000%, that you are wrong. There's no evidence that the two had anything to do with one another.
Quote:You'll be hearing about it in the news after the dust settles. Doesn't make him right about everything. Doesn't even calculate the loss of life and suffering that added in to the enterprise... But, he said it would happen as a result of increased freedoms in the region.
And, it did.
Oh, is this happening because of increasing freedoms in the region? In what way? None of the places we intervened in are any freer today than they were before, and hundreds of thousands are dead. Please, give us specific examples of the freedoms that you are referring to.
Before calling me or anyone here a 'fingers in ears' group, provide one bit of evidence. Show that you know the difference between correlation and causation in things like this.
I think that former Bush supporters have been secretly hoping for years for some sort of event to take place that they could then turn to their advantage, claiming that it was the result of something he did. In an attempt to quiet the cognitive dissonance that results from realizing that they spent years defending a truly foolish man who made mistake after mistake.
Enough sidebar for me, don't want to derail the thread any further.
Cycloptichorn