53
   

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

 
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 12:38 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

We must not get involved; the neighboring countries must do it. Gaddafi has hired mercenaries to carry out killings of his own citizens; the "community" that surrounds Libya must respond - and the US must stay out of it.


Don't hold your breath.

The United States 'tamed' Ghadaffi in 1986 in a bombing raid (executed with no help from our French allies) on Gadaffi's headquarters, which very nearly killed him. This followed a long-standing dispute over Libya's claim of sovereignty over most of the central Mediterranean; a brief naval engegemment in the Gulf of Sidra over that claim; and Libya's execution of a bombing raid in a Berlin nightclub that killed several American servicemen. Subsequently Libya and Ghadaffi were likely the prime movers behind the destruction of a PANAM 747 over Lockerbie Scotland in 1988 - very likely a retaliation. Fearing more U.S. action, Ghadaffi soon afterwards ended his overt associations with terrorists and presented a much more cooperative stance with western European powers, but not the U.S. Business with Lybia picked up in Italy, France and the UK, and a couple of years ago our good friends in the UK released the convicted Lybian organizer of the PANAM aircraft on the false pretext of a nonexistant terminal disease - all to facilitate some pending contracts with the dictator.

In 2003 the United Nations, at the request of the Union of African nations, appointed Libya to chair the UN Human Rights Commission.

The Libyan people should have thrown out this dictator long ago. Now is better than never. We don't owe them or their neighbors anything.
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 01:04 pm
@georgeob1,
Gob just keeps pumping out the lies. Again, when we look at the historical record, it pretty much demolishes his arguments which follow the American propaganda line. After so many lies, so much deception from their governments, why is it that more people don't call Gob out when he pumps out these gross fabrications.

And note well, his posts NEVER contain any sources. Why isn't there just one massive heave of uncontrollable laughter to each of his posts. [Finn's are hardly any better]

Quote:

Lawyers, politicians, diplomats and relatives of Lockerbie victims now believe that the former Libyan intelligence officer is innocent. Robert Black QC, an emeritus professor of Scottish law at Edinburgh University, was one of the architects of the original trial in Holland. He has closely followed developments since the disaster happened and in 2000 devised the non-jury trial system for the al-Megrahi case.

Even before the trial he was so sure the evidence against al-Megrahi would not stand up in court that he is on record as saying that a conviction would be impossible. When I asked how he feels about this remark now, Black replied: ‘I am still absolutely convinced that I am right. No reasonable tribunal, on the evidence heard at the original trial, should or could have convicted him and it is an absolute disgrace and outrage what the Scottish court did.’

http://www.nogw.com/download/_07_lockerbie_truths.pdf


Quote:
1981:

January - Chad and Libya announce their intention to unite. [7]

February - A French plot (with US support) to assassinate Qaddafi is dropped when the French President Giscard is unexpectedly defeated at the polls. [8]

March - US claims that Libya is running training camps for terrorists. [12]

May - US closes Libyan diplomatic mission in Washington, citing inter alia its "support for international terrorism." [12]

August - The U.S. holds military manoeuvres off the coast of Libya in order to provoke a response from the Qaddafi regime. When a Libyan plane allegedly fires a missile at U.S. planes penetrating Libyan airspace, two Libyan planes are shot down. [4] [15] [18]

Apparently the Reagan administration had decided to cast Qaddafi as a danger, in order to justify arms spending and to counter low domestic popularity. A plan was duly drawn up by the CIA to overthrow Qaddafi's regime. [8] [9] [18]

October - US imposes controls on exports of small aircraft, helicopters, aircraft parts, avionics to Libya to "limit Libyan capacity to support military adventures in neighboring countries." [12]

Egypt and Sudan abort a plan to attack Libyan forces in Sudan when president Sadat of Egypt is assassinated (the assassination is not related to Qaddafi). [18]

Goukouni, president of Chad -- having been promised an OAU peace-keeping force and French aid -- asks the Libyan forces to leave Chad. Four days later, Qaddafi agrees. Given a deadline of December 31, Libyan troops are actually out of Chad (though not the Aouzou strip) within two weeks. [18]

The U.S. provides some of the funding for the OAU peace- keeping force, but covertly is doing everything possible to subvert the government of Chad. Beginning in early 1981, the Reagan administration had started providing arms to Habre's forces, regrouping in Sudan. Additional support was being provided by Egypt, Morocco, and France. Significantly, even after Libyan forces withdraw from Chad, U.S. aid to Habre continues. Habre proceedes to march into the country, maneuver around the OAU peace-keepers, who want to avoid combat, and takes over the government. [18]

November - Reagan accuses Qaddafi of sending a hit squad to assassinate him, but reveals no evidence of this. The information is later shown to be false, probably fabricated by a CIA group with the help of groups linked to Israel and Lebanon, who held Qaddafi as their enemy. [8] [9] [18]

Exxon abandons its Libyan operations. [12]

December - Reagan administration calls on 1,500 US citizens residing in Libya to leave "as soon as possible," citing "the danger which the Libyan regime poses to US citizens." US passports are declared invalid for travel to Libya. [12]

US oil firms agree to withdraw US personnel but announce they will be replaced with other foreign technicians. [12]

1982:

March 6 - USA embargoes oil imports from Libya and technology transfer is also banned. [7] [12]

November - US State Department warns oil companies (notably Charter Oil, Coastal Corp.) against selling refined products derived from Libyan crude in US. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) mounts opposition to Libyan occupation of Chad, assists Libyan exiles. CIA Director William J. Casey says these activities might lead to "ultimate" removal of Qaddafi. [12]

US bars Boeing sale of 12 commercial jets to Libyan Arab Airline for $600 million. [12]

1983:

President Nimieri of the Sudan meets with Mohammed Youssef Magarieff in Washington. Magarieff is a Libyan exile in Egypt, who has set up the National Front for the Salvation of Libya, "dedicated to assassinating Qaddafi and overthrowing his regime." Nimieri promises him every form of support short of war: training facilities, weapons, travel facilitation, and carte blanche to conduct any type of activity against Libya from Sudan. [18]

February - the United States announces that its swift deployment of naval vessels and AWACs has prevented an impending Libyan attack on the Sudan. Strangely, Egypt states that there is no threat and the U.S. forces withdraw the next month. At the Security Council, the U.S. replies to Libyan charges of U.S. provocative military actions, declaring that "The United States had never engaged and did not now engage in acts of provocation" and that Libyan adventurism had been deterred. [18]

We now know, however, what actually happened. The whole thing was a joint US-Egyptian-Sudanese scheme to entrap Libya. Sudanese undercover agents acting as a pro-Libyan group in Khartoum were to request Libyan air intervention, at which time the Egyptian air force, guided by AWACs and refueled by U.S. planes, would unleash devastating counterattacks on Qaddafi's planes. Egypt's only condition for the plan was that the U.S. role had to be kept secret. Once word leaked out about the movement of the AWACs, the plot had to be aborted. [18]

March-August - In Chad Goukouni is overthrown. From his Libyan exile, Goukouni reorganizes his forces and occupies the strategic northern town of Faya Largeau. As the conflict draws in other players, particularly France, Chad was in effect a partitioned country. With French help, the N'Djamena government of Hissein Habré controls the southern part of Chad. The area north of the sixteenth parallel, however, is controlled by Goukouni and his Libyan backers. [7] [12] [18]

August - President Reagan reports the deployment of two AWACS electronic surveillance planes and eight F-15 fighter planes and ground logistical support forces to assist Chad against Libyan and rebel forces. [15]

1984:

March - In response to alleged Libyan bombing of Omburdman, Sudan, US sends two AWACS surveillance planes to Egypt. [12]

April - The Libyan National Salvation Front (LNSF) organizes a demonstration in London, at which a British policewoman is killed allegedly by a Libyan diplomat, leading to the breaking of diplomatic relations between Tripoli and London. [7] There is compelling evidence that the killing was actually a CIA operation, probably with Israeli involvement, designed to vilify the Libyans, making action against Libya easier to take. [11]

May 8 - Assassination attempt on Qaddafi by the LNSF, who were trained by the CIA. Some 2,000 people are arrested and 8 publicly hanged. [1] [7] The French secret service are also involved, the French government seeing Qaddafi as a threat to their interests in Africa. [8] [18]

According to the terms of a September 1984 treaty, France withdraws its forces from Chad. Libya, however, decides to keep its troops there, and skirmishes and fighting continue intermittently. [7]

October - US charges Libya with complicity in laying of mines in Red Sea. [12]

1985:

The US State Department, with some difficulty, dissuades the White house from persuing a plan for a joint US-Eqyptian invasion of Libya. [8] [18]

September - Libya expels 100,000 immigrant workers — which strikes hard on neighbouring countries of Tunisia and Egypt. Borders to the two countries are closed. [1]

November - Washington Post reports that President Reagan has authorized covert operation to undermine Qaddafi regime, based on June 1984 CIA assessment that "no course of action short of stimulating Qaddafi's fall will bring significant and enduring change in Libyan policies." [12] [18]

US bars imports of refined petroleum products from Libya, which have increased following opening of Ras Lanuf petrochemical complex earlier this year. [12]

December - Reagan accuses Qaddafi of being involved in bomb attacks at Rome and Vienna airports, which killed 20 people including 5 US citizens. There is no evidence of Libyan involvement but new US sanctions against Libya are imposed. [8] [12] [18]

1986:

Early in the year French troops return to southern Chad and there is a de facto partition of the country. [18]

January - Reagan approves expanded covert efforts to subvert Qaddafi and authorizes a high official to travel to Cairo to continue the military planning begun last year. The investigative reporters of the Washington Post find out about the secret mission. National Security Adviser John Poindexter asks the Post to kill the story. Here we get to see how the newspaper that had exposed Watergate responds to a plea from the U.S. government to help hide a U.S. plan to violate international law. Editor Ben Bradlee decides that the mission would be mentioned, but in a passing oblique reference down in paragraph five. [18]

Reagan breaks all economic relations with Libya. At a White House meeting, according to one participant, a decision is explicitly reached to provoke Qaddafi by again sending naval vessels and aircraft to the Gulf of Sidra. Any Libyan response would be used to justify military action. For four days in January, U.S. war planes fly in the region covered by Libyan radar. In February, two carrier battle groups and their planes conduct exercises in the same region, though not in waters claimed by Libya. [18]

February - US revises sanctions to allow oil companies to continue operations in Libya temporarily. Rule allows sale of Libyan crude at Libyan ports, but bars drilling for, extracting, distributing, or marketing Libyan oil. In addition, companies are expected to dispose of their Libyan holdings "as soon as practicable on fair and appropriate terms," but no deadline is set. [12]

March - US Sixth Fleet challenges Qaddafi's claim to territorial waters in Gulf of Sidra, crosses his "Line of Death." Action provokes Libyan attack during which two Libyan patrol boats are sunk, drowning 72 Libyan sailors. An onshore antiaircraft missile site is also destroyed. [12] [15] [18]

A British engineer attests that he was watching radar screens during the two days of fighting and saw US planes cross not only into the 12 miles of Libyan territorial waters, but over Libyan land as well. "I watched the planes fly approximately eight miles into Libyan airspace," said the engineer. "I don't think the Libyans had any choice but to hit back. In my opinion they were reluctant to do so." [8]

Before and after these events Qaddafi makes several attempts to open dialogue with Washington, but all are rebuffed. [8]

The US here adopts the doctrine of "preventive war", saying that such attacks are justified "in self defense against future attack." This is the first explicit statement of this doctrine. [9]

By the end of March, various stories have reached the press regarding U.S. military plans against Libya in concert with Egypt. One plan that is described "involved an Egyptian ground attack followed by a request for United States assistance," a pattern "similar to the one in the Suez crisis of 1956...." The semi-official Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram reports that there have been three U.S. efforts to get Egypt to attack Libya, all rejected by Cairo. The U.S. Ambassador to Egypt informs Washington, however, that Egyptian leader Mubarak secretly vowed to continue the anti-Libyan military planning with Washington. [18]

April 5 - Terrorist bomb destroys West Berlin discotheque frequented by US servicemen, killing three persons, injuring over 150. US charges Libyan complicity on basis of intercepted Libyan diplomatic transmissions. Reagan states that "evidence is direct, it is precise, it is irrefutable," begins planning military retaliation. [12] US and West German intelligence however, had no evidence of Libyan involvement. [14] [18]

A German TV documentary in 1998 presented evidence that the CIA and Mossad may have been involved in the bombing of the discotheque. [13]

April 14 - In hopes of forestalling US military response to West Berlin bombing, EC countries agree to reduce size of Libyan embassies, restrict movements of Libyan diplomats in Europe. [12]

April 15 - US bombers attack Qaddafi's headquarters, home, military airfields and alleged terrorist training camps around Tripoli and Benghazi in retaliation for the alleged Libyan role in 5 April bombing, and to deter future terrorist acts against US installations. Over 100 civilians are killed. UK allows US to use British airfields for exercise and provides strong public support, but France denies overflight rights for US planes. [1] [2] [3] [12] [15] [18]

May - Libyan Arab Foreign Bank files suit in London seeking payment of funds blocked by Bankers Trust London under US assets freeze. [12]

June - Treasury revokes special exemptions for US oil companies but authorizes them to enter into standstill agreements with Libyan authorities to maintain their ownership rights for three years while they continue to negotiate the sale of assets to Libya. [12]

August - OPEC officials report that France has begun boycotting imports of Libyan oil, refined products. In further attempt to destabilize Qaddafi, Reagan administration sponsors disinformation campaign on extent of Libyan opposition to Qaddafi regime. [12]

A memo from John Poindexter, the president's national security adviser, reveals some of the US disinformation program. Officials then admit that they have no evidence against Qaddafi. One senior spokesman for the State Department resigns in protest. British intelligence also describe US intelligence about Libya, passed to them, as being "wildly inaccurate" and "a deliberate effort to deceive". [8] [18]

October - Qaddafi and Goukouni have a falling out, whereupon the Libyans find themselves opposed by all Chadian factions. The Libyans are promptly routed by the Chadians, aided by new U.S. military aid, French air cover, French special forces and advisers, and U.S. and French intelligence. [18]

1987:

U.S.-Libyan confrontation calms down. Because of the falling price of oil, Qaddafi finds his country facing serious economic and social problems, and so is less inclined to challenge the United States. For its part, Washington concludes that U.S. pressure has made an anti-Qaddafi coup in Libya less likely, by making Qaddafi into a hero who had stood up to the American colossus. In addition, the Iran-contra scandal tones down the exploits of the National Security Council. [18]

March 27 - Liberalization of the economy, loosening of the socialist structures. [1]

mid 1987 - Abu Nidal is ejected from Syria, he relocates to Libya. [18]

August - Using as a pretext an alleged Libyan attack (that French sources consider to be a complete fabrication), Habre seizes Aouzou. Libya retakes it a few weeks later and a Chadian ground unit attacks an air base sixty miles inside Libya. U.S. officials deny that they advised Habre to go north, but they refuse to criticize the cross-border raid. [18]

September - The OAU get Libya and Chad to accept a cease fire. [18]

High Court of Justice in London rules in favour of Libya, orders Bankers Trust London to transfer to Libyan Arab Foreign Bank $131 million, plus accrued interest, that has been blocked by US assets freeze. US Treasury authorizes payment on 9 October. [12]

1988:

spendius
 
  2  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 02:31 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Lawyers, politicians, diplomats and relatives of Lockerbie victims now believe that the former Libyan intelligence officer is innocent.


That's right. I've seen them interviewed and heard them say it. The unofficial leader of the relatives thinks the same. I haven't a clue myself but it's pretty obvious it isn't something to build a theory on. It could look like there's a need for the theory emotionally.

One thing we do know. A government can shut down the internet at a moment's notice. And everything else.

What we do see is being mucked, foddered, watered and provided with electricity. That immense logistical system is "noises off" and seemingly is only noticed by a few.

The idea that the US shouldn't get involved is a fatuity of the highest order similar to the fatuity in 1956 which led to all this ****. Isolationists in a global economy eh? I ask you. Stupid doesn't come much stupider.

spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 02:36 pm
@spendius,
Not only do some want to leave their kids and grandkids up to their neck's in debt but they also want to leave them out of world history with no aims except retreating into their breeding hutches.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 02:58 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

The idea that the US shouldn't get involved is a fatuity of the highest order similar to the fatuity in 1956 which led to all this ****. Isolationists in a global economy eh? I ask you. Stupid doesn't come much stupider.


I presume you are referring to Eisenhower's demand that the British, French and Israeli forces stop their ongoing invasion of Egypt (as the Soviets were invading Hungary)?

Do you really believe that event is connected either to Gadaffi's coup and ascent to power or to the current uprising there?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 04:37 pm
@Ceili,
Tuaregs, largely from Mali.

At one time their membership in the Libyan army numbered some 10,000

Mali is concerned that when Gahdaffi is defeated, they will returned...armed to the teeth.
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 04:58 pm
BTW, does anyone know where UK's PM Cameron is right now?
He's peddling arms in the world's hottest zone.
Business is bloody business.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 05:14 pm
@fbaezer,
From marketwatch:
Quote:
Obama preparing all options for Libya response

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The U.S. is considering "the full range of options" to respond to violence in Libya, President Barack Obama said Wednesday. Speaking at the White House as anti-government protests continued to roil Libya, Obama said the U.S. supports freedom of assembly and free speech. He said he's sending Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Geneva to meet her counterparts on Monday to discuss the situation.


I'm just hoping Obama and the US doesn't become the long ranger on any actions taken.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 05:15 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
I haven't a clue myself but it's pretty obvious it isn't something to build a theory on. It could look like there's a need for the theory emotionally.


You admit that you don't have a clue but then you presume to suggest that it's bogus. Did you even read the whole article? Given the propensity of both the US and UK governments to lie, to smear whatever country and leader they choose to depending upon what side of bed they got up on, it's a fair bet that there's more to this than meets most people's eyes and brains.

Quote:
The idea that the US shouldn't get involved is a fatuity of the highest order similar to the fatuity in 1956 which led to all this ****. Isolationists in a global economy eh? I ask you. Stupid doesn't come much stupider.


The issue is not one of US involvement, Spendi. You've brought in a whole herd of red herrings.

It's proper US involvement. Up to now, it's been nothing more than their [and the UK's] narrow self serving interests. We've seen where that leads. The deaths of innocents of all countries but largely, in this ME debacle that's been going on for close to a century, it's the poor people of the ME.

Stupid is thinking that the US/UK/etc can go on having their way with other people's lives and wealth. That's dumb on orders of magnitude way above the simplistic thinking of a Gob/Finn/H2oman/[stick in your favorite nutcase].
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 05:48 pm
@failures art,
Those regimes weren't using air power, snipers and mercenaries to slaughter protesters.

The day that video clips supplant ammo clips, and cell phones replace ak47s as the means of obtaining and holding power the world round are far far off I'm afraid.

In Algeria, the dictator turned tail and ran away with a few billion in gold and in Egypt, the US, arguably, had some financial leverage.

It appears that some stern talk from the US may have reigned in the violence in Bahrain, but no one can influence Ghadaffi with tough words, or hollow threats. If he wants to stay and fight, he will.

The Libyans know this and armed themselves as soon as they could.

Interestingly enough, while you call for tough talk (but no violence), other have weighed in:


Quote:
This call followed an address delivered by the influential Sheikh Yousuf al-Qaradawi, head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars; he led Friday prayers at Cairo’s Tahrir Square on February 18. In his address, aired on al-Jazeera TV yesterday, Qaradawi declared: “I hereby issue a fatwa to the officers and soldiers who can kill Mu’ammar Al-Gaddafi: Whoever among them can fire a bullet at him, thus relieving the country and the people of him, should do so.”

The truth is that I do not want to say anything to Al-Gaddafi, because one should only address people who are reasonable. People who are not reasonable should not be addressed. That man is no longer reasonable. He has been crazy for a long time.

Among the signs of his madness, as we have seen, he wanted to be a philosopher, and come up with theories, like Marx and Mao Tsetung. . . .

We have seen his peculiar behavior. He has become the laughing stock of every Arab summit. He’s the joker. He travels all over the world in his colorful clothes, carrying his tent with him all over the globe, no matter the cost, in which he hosts his visitors. …

Therefore, I address the Libyan army, which is definitely endowed with faith, manliness, and honor. They must not attack their own people. Who would kill their own people?! Would you sacrifice an entire people for the sake of a madman?!

I hereby issue a fatwa to the officers and soldiers who can kill Mu’ammar Al-Gaddafi: Whoever among them can fire a bullet at him, thus relieving the country and the people of him, should do so. This man wants to annihilate the people, so I am protecting the people.

I rule that whoever can fire a bullet, and relieve us, as well as Libya and its great people, of this man’s evil and danger, should.


A good use of violence or should the Libyans try and talk (ever so sternly) to the mad tyrant?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 05:49 pm
@revelette,
NEO-CON!
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 06:01 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqzr8JfI5lU
0 Replies
 
Irishk
 
  2  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 06:12 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
al-Qaradawi probably doesn't have much room to be judging the craziness of others. He wanted Salman Rushdie murdered, too. And don't even get him started on others he perceives as 'undesirables'.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 06:29 pm
Graphic photos of Libya!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_FK882LI_8
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 06:29 pm
I have my fingers crossed that the Egyptians are organised enough to not let the bloodshed in Libya continue.The possibility of civil war is already being talked about .
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 07:03 pm
@fbaezer,
Quote:
BTW, does anyone know where UK's PM Cameron is right now?
He's peddling arms in the world's hottest zone.


He gets a bonus if he sells 1/10 of one percent of what the US sells.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 08:49 pm
Latest update from Al Jazeera:

Region in turmoil

Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain: A roundup of the popular protests that have swept the region over the last two months.

Last Modified: 22 Feb 2011 16:05 GMT

The world’s attention has been focused on a handful of countries - Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and Libya - since the first popular protests broke out in Tunisia in December. But nearly a dozen countries in the region have seen political unrest, and the protest movement shows no signs of stopping.


Below is a summary of the demonstrations so far, and links to our coverage. You can also click a country on the map above for more information.

Tunisia

Protesters in Tunisia ousted Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, their president for more than 23 years, after nearly a month of protests.

The protests started when a street vendor, Mohamed Bouazizi, set himself on fire after his cart was confiscated by police. His anger - over unemployment, poverty and corruption - resonated in Tunisia, and led to weeks of street protests against Ben Ali’s autocratic government. Security forces cracked down brutally on many of the protests, with more than 200 people killed. But the rallies continued, and Ben Ali eventually fled the country for exile in


Saudi Arabia.


His departure on January 14 has not stopped the protest movement, though: Many Tunisians continue to demand the ouster of Mohamed Ghannouchi, the prime minister, and fellow members of the Constitutional Democratic Rally (Ben Ali’s party) who remain in power.
Egypt

After Ben Ali, Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak was the second Arab autocrat to resign, his nearly 30-year rule brought to an end by 18 days of protests.

The revolt began on January 25, when tens of thousands of protesters marched against Mubarak’s government. A “day of rage” on January 28 drew even larger crowds in downtown Cairo, where they were attacked brutally by Egyptian security forces. They stood their ground, though, and the police eventually withdrew, ceding control of Tahrir Square to the protesters.

That led to a two-week standoff between the protesters and the government, with the former occupying Tahrir Square and fending off a sustained assault from government-sponsored thugs. Mubarak was at first defiant, pledging reforms - he sacked his cabinet and appointed a vice president, longtime intelligence chief Omar Suleiman - but vowing to remain in office. In a televised address on February 10, he promised to finish his term.

Behind the scenes, though, Mubarak had clearly lost the support of the military, and Suleiman announced his departure in a brief statement less than 24 hours later.

Egyptians have continued to stage rallies, though, with hundreds of thousands demanding that the new military government pursue real democratic reforms.

Libya

Longtime autocrat Muammar Gaddafi has reportedly lost control of eastern Libya, and his army, supported by foreign mercenaries, is waging a savage war against civilians.

Small protests in January led to larger rallies in mid-February, mostly in the east - in Benghazi, Libya’s second city, and other towns like Al-Bayda. The protests continued to grow over the next few days, with thousands of people in the streets on February 17 and 18 - and dozens dead, many killed by snipers.

Less than a week later, Benghazi was reportedly in the hands of the protesters, and demonstrations had spread to the capital Tripoli. Eyewitnesses reported Libyan military jets bombing civilians, and gangs of mercenaries roaming the streets, firing indiscriminately.

Gaddafi’s 42-year rule, the longest in the Arab world, has been sustained by widespread political repression and human rights abuses. Protesters are also angry about his economic mismanagement: Libya has vast oil wealth - more than half of its GDP comes from oil - but that money has not filtered down. Unemployment is high, particularly among the country’s youth, which accounts for more than one-third of the population.

Algeria


The Algerian government has so far kept a lid on protests, most of which have been centered in the capital, Algiers.

Demonstrators staged several scattered rallies in January, mostly over unemployment and inflation. They planned a major rally in the capital on February 12, when a crowd - estimates of its size vary between 2,000 and 10,000 - faced off with nearly 30,000 riot police who sealed off the city. Dozens of people were arrested, but the rally remained peaceful; demonstrators chanetd slogans like “Bouteflika out,” referring to president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, Algeria’s ruler for the last 12 years.

A second rally, on February 19, attracted a smaller crowd - in the hundreds - which was again outnumbered by riot police. The government also suspended train service and set up roadblocks outside the capital. Several people were arrested.

Bouteflika has tried to head off further protests by promising to lift the country’s decades-old emergency law.


Morocco


The first significant protests in Morocco broke out on February 20, when tens of thousands of people (37,000, according to the country’s interior minister) took to the streets. They were organised by a loose coalition of human rights groups, journalists and labor unions.

Demonstrators demanded not the ouster of King Mohammed VI, but instead a series of more modest reforms. They want the king to give up some of his powers - right now, he can dismiss parliament and impose a state of emergency - and to dismiss his current cabinet. “The king should reign, not rule,” read one banner held by protesters.

The rallies were peaceful, though acts of vandalism did happen afterwards: Dozens of banks were burned down, along with more than 50 other buildings. (The culprits are unknown.)

Mohammed has promised “irreversible” political reforms, though he has yet to offer any specifics.

Jordan

Protests in Jordan started in mid-January, when thousands of demonstrators staged rallies in Amman and six other cities. Their grievances were mostly economic: Food prices continue to rise, as does the country’s double-digit inflation rate.

Jordan’s King Abdullah tried to defuse the protests earlier this month by sacking his entire cabinet. The new prime minister, Marouf Bakhit, promised “real economic and political reforms.”

But the firing - Abdullah’s perennial response to domestic unrest - did little to dampen the protests. Thousands of people took to the streets once again on February 18 to demand constitutional reforms and lower food prices. At least eight people were injured during that rally.

Bahrain

Anti-government protests have continued for a week, and show no sign of stopping. The demonstrations began on February 14, when thousands converged on Pearl Roundabout to protest against the government; they were later dispersed by security forces who used deadly force.

In the following days, funeral marches and other rallies also came under fire by police; they have since been withdrawn, and the army has allowed peaceful rallies to continue in the roundabout.

Protesters started out calling for economic and political reform, but many demonstrators are now calling for the ouster of King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa.

The protest movement largely draws from Bahrain’s Shia population, a majority group that often complains of oppression from the country’s Sunni rulers. They argue that the king’s economic policies favor the Sunni minority. Khalifa tried to defuse tensions by giving each Bahraini family a gift of 1,000 dinars (US $2,650), but the move won him little support.

Yemen

Rallies in Yemen have continued for nearly two weeks, with the bulk of the protesters concentrated in Sana’a, the capital; the southern city of Aden; and Taiz, in the east. Their grievances are numerous: As much as one-third of the country is unemployed, and the public blames government corruption for squandering billions in oil wealth.

Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh conceded little during a news conference in the Yemeni capital on Monday. He promised reforms, but warned against what he called “coups and seizing power through anarchy and killing.” He also offered a dialogue with opposition parties, an offer that was quickly rejected.

He has also likened the protests to a “virus” sweeping the country. His security forces have responded to the rallies with deadly force, particularly in Aden, where at least ten people have been killed.

Iraq

Thousands of people have rallied in the northern province of Sulaymaniyah during four days of protests over corruption and the economy. At least five people have been killed, and dozens more injured, by Kurdish security forces who opened fire on the crowds.

Several other small protests have popped up across the country in recent days: Nearly 1,000 people in Basra demanded electricity and other services; 300 people in Fallujah demanded that the governor be sacked; dozens in Nassiriyah complained about unemployment.

Iraqi protesters, unlike their counterparts in many other countries, are not (yet) calling for the government’s ouster. Instead, they’re demanding better basic services: electricity, food, and an effort to stamp out corruption.

In response to the unrest, the Iraqi parliament adjourned for a week, its members instructed to travel home and meet with constituents - an odd response, perhaps, given that the government’s inaction is a leading cause of popular anger.

Iran

Opposition movements in Iran have tried to stage several protests in recent days, and the movement’s two unofficial leaders - Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi - remain under house arrest.

The first round of protests, on February 14, drew people to the streets for the first time in months. At least two people were killed, and several others wounded, according to Iranian officials.

Tens of thousands of people then tried to rally on Sunday, but were met by riot police wielding steel batons and clubs. Three more people were killed. More protests may be planned for the coming days, and Iranians have resorted to "silent protests," small marches aimed at avoiding conflict with the security forces.


http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/spotlight/2011/02/2011222121213770475.htmlom al jazeera
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Feb, 2011 08:51 pm
The New York Times made a really well organized page for all regional activity.

NYT

A
R
T
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Feb, 2011 09:23 am
Gaddafi's second speech (bottom first) Guardian live blog

2:37pm GMT: Gaddafi says he doesn't know when the violence will come to an end but urges parents to take away the "guns from the kids" and arrest those behind the violence. He wonders whether bin Laden will compensate the victims' families. Gaddafi also mentions bin Laden's theoretician, al-Zawahiri. His monologue has come to an end. He spoke for about half an hour. It was an extraordinary rant, trying to blame bin Laden and jihadists, who he said had given hallucination pills to young Libyans. It will confirm that Gaddafi is totally out of touch if he really believed in what he was saying.

2.32pm: He's blaming bin Laden for Iraq and Afghanistan as well. "All they want is to kill your kids, that's what bin Laden wants, he should be happy now, that's what he wants," says Gaddafi. Again he says Libyans should take responsibility for the country as he has handed power to them through people's committees.

2.29pm: I am trying to show you parental advice, says Gaddafi adopting a father of the nation tone. He now compares himself to the Queen saying he is in a similar position to her. He cannot make rules, only offer advice. He is returning to the "hallucination pills" that young Libyans are supposed to be ingesting. More Queen comparisons. He does not have the authority to impose rules on the people. "I have become more of a symbolic leader."

2.27pm: Now that the oil has stopped, says Gaddafi, how will the people survive. Will bin Laden support the people, he asks. How are people going to buy cars, get married or buy goods that were cheaply available, he goes on. Maybe there will be a "revision of salaries and other incomes".

2.24pm: He is again blaming al-Qaida for turning Libya's "youngsters and children" against the regime. He says there are only a few "inciters" who also happen to be against the west. Is this a cack-handed appeal to gain western sympathy? If so it's an odd way of going about things, which will merely confirm Gaddafi's tenuous grasp on reality.

2.21pm: There are no images of Gaddafi, just his disembodied voice on Al-Jazeera, adding to the surreal nature of the occasion. While his regime crumbles, he's talking about kids taking pills. It really is like Nero fiddling while Rome burns.

2.17pm: Gaddafi is talking at long last. He starts off in bizarre fashion, accusing protesters of drinking pills that make them commit "animal acts". He says the protesters have been brainwashed by Osama bin Laden, whose people have been giving protesters these pills.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Feb, 2011 09:32 am
@JPB,
What utterly silly comment from the Grauniad. But that's normal and only worth pointing out to those who don't know the rag.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 11:43:42