0
   

A Message to Michael

 
 
Dasein
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Nov, 2010 12:01 pm
@NAACP,
I didn't say you were the 'conversation in your head'. I said you are the 'conversation'. The two are not the same. The 'conversation' comes before the 'conversation in your head' and the sole purpose of 'conversation in your head' is to drown out the 'conversation'.

How ya like them apples?
NAACP
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Nov, 2010 01:48 pm
@Dasein,
The "conversation" I have with myself which happens when reading "Being and Time"? And the sole purpose of that "conversation" is for me to fully "understand" the who in me?
Dasein
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Nov, 2010 02:41 pm
@NAACP,
NAACP;

You said;
"The "conversation" I have with myself which happens when reading "Being and Time"? And the sole purpose of that "conversation" is for me to fully "understand" the who in me?"

Close enough.

On second thought, not close enough. The "conversation" takes place on a different level which doesn't include the "conversation in your head". As a matter of fact, when you get to the point of recognizing the difference between the “conversation” and the "conversation in your head", the "conversation in your head" shuts up and let's you Be.
NAACP
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Nov, 2010 02:52 pm
@Dasein,
Indeed.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/30/2024 at 10:43:48