4
   

First Photo Of A Human Being Ever?

 
 
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 02:33 am
http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2010/10/22/first-human-picture-2.jpg?t=1287769476&s=3
http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2010/10/22/130754296/first-photo-of-a-human-being-ever
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 4 • Views: 2,207 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Francis
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 02:38 am
@tsarstepan,
That's in Paris, by Louis Daguerre..
laughoutlood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 02:38 am
@tsarstepan,
too close to the silver nitrate

looking daguerres

typical
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 03:04 am
@Francis,
I remember seeing this photograph in my history of photography I had take back several years ago. This assumption that these may be the first human beings on film seems a bit too late in the making.

I wonder if Krulwich's so called epiphany is just a personal thing or an actual historical revelation that no one figured before.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:03 am
@tsarstepan,
i seem to recall the claim being made about this photo nearly 30 years ago
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:05 am
@djjd62,
That Krulwich thinks he's so smart but he's apparently 30 years late! (((sigh))) I figured as much....
Thanks for the sanity check DJ.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:10 am
@tsarstepan,
might have been nat geo or one of the science type journals
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:29 am
from wiki about Daguerre

Daguerreotypes were usually portraits; the rarer views are much sought-after and are more expensive. The portrait process took several minutes and required the subjects to remain stock still. Samuel Morse was astonished to learn that Daguerrotypes of streets of Paris did not show any humans, until he realized that due to the long exposure times all moving objects became invisible. The time was later reduced with the "faster" lenses such as the Petzval's portrait lens, the first mathematically calculated lens.

there caption for the photo

"Boulevard du Temple", taken by Daguerre in 1838 in Paris, was the first photograph of a person. The image shows a street, but because of the over ten minute exposure time the moving traffic does not appear. The exceptions are the man and shoe-shine boy at the bottom left, and two people sitting at a table nearby who stood still long enough to have their images captured.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 Oct, 2010 04:36 am
the photo shows up on this list of the top 10 firsts in photography as #3, not sure where they sourced their info, but the post is from January 13, 2009, so they scooped Krulwich by almost two years

http://listverse.com/2009/01/13/top-10-incredible-early-firsts-in-photography/
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beautiful Animals - Discussion by Roberta
Aloha! - Question by boomerang
Photo lovers -- take a look at this.... - Question by boomerang
Michael Belk's modern Jesus photographs - Question by boomerang
LIGHTHOUSES OF THE WORLD. - Discussion by farmerman
Is taking his picture legal? - Question by aquestion
Amazing History Photos - Discussion by hopelessjoe
Poor travel pictures, well loved. - Discussion by ossobuco
Just a Photo - Discussion by Pitter
Knockout landscape photos - Discussion by ossobuco
 
  1. Forums
  2. » First Photo Of A Human Being Ever?
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/19/2021 at 04:01:18