1
   

Wal-Mart signifies all that is wrong in America

 
 
BlueMonkey
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2004 12:36 am
Who will survive?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Feb, 2004 06:20 pm
Quote:
Late last night, it came to my immediate attention that I was out of a specific body part wiping product, and it was clear to me that my life could not continue properly until more was acquired. So off to the corner store I went (and quickly, as Mother Nature was calling as loudly as she could).

Now the particular corner store I drove to at 90 mph was known quaintly as the Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market. I found it odd that Wal-Mart, your favorite neighborhood monopoly conglomerate, would attempt to corner the non-Wal-Mart market as well...then again, I wasn't surprised at all. What I was surprised about was what I found inside as I ran down each and every confusing aisle in search of a roll of sanity.

* * *

Now, this is where the journey gets screwy. I could have sworn I was in an actual Wal-Mart now, because I stumbled upon: televisions, stereos, even skateboards! In a grocery store, no less! Yes, there were cell phones for sale, blow dryers, even satellite systems. I'm all for gadgets, but when I'm looking for toilet paper late at night (in my friendly, neighborhood market) these comforts of home are the last things I expect to get in my way in my search for the greatest comfort of all-peace of mind.

It was bad enough that the cosmetics aisles were actually larger than most neighborhood markets, but when I stumbled upon the school supplies and automotive portion of the store I knew the ghost of Sam Walton had gone too far. Had I been searching for any other item late that night, I would have told Sam's ghost and the neighborhood nightmare he had conjured to take a flying leap into the neighborhood landfill. But he had me, and he knew it. It's no coincidence that they make the most important things so hard to find. They plan it that way. How many times have you said to yourself, "I need a loaf of bread, a gallon of milk and a stick of butter," and come out with a new riding mower and a baby grand piano? If you live in Sam's neighborhood, I bet it's more times than you care to admit.

I could get a key made, a prescription filled and my taxes done, all before I even got to the frozen foods section. I was beginning to believe that "neighborhood market" was a euphemism for labyrinth, and only the carefully selected, subduing, elevator-style tunes were keeping me from going ballistic inside my friendly neighborhood market. There were automated toilets, sinks, hand dryers, debit card machines, even check-outs! When I was a kid, the neighborhood market was run by a guy named Sam and the only thing he had inside were soft drinks, beer, and, oh yeah-toilet paper. We've come a long way, baby.

Or perhaps we've taken a step back. Isn't this what Hitler and Stalin wanted? Fewer choices in a readily available environment? On the surface it appears handy, easy and convenient; but underneath all the choices, I realized that the Neighborhood Market was attempting to squash any other choices, just as the friendly neighborhood superstore has done to other general stores. I never did get my toilet paper that night. I've decided I never need to buy it again. All I need to do is look under all the crap I bought on one of my late night toilet paper excursions, find the receipt and use that.


Wal-Mart has everything (except what you need)
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Feb, 2004 10:24 pm
So the point of that was that the author was too stupid to find the paper products aisle? It's the same aisle with 20 different brands of paper towels and 30 different brands of toilet paper. Also, facial tissue can be found in that aisle. They have Kleenex and Puff, and generic , and every other brand...

You would think that someone with enough sense to write and publish an article, would have enough sense to read the huge signs telling him what was in each aisle...
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 12:39 am
Did you hear about the new one? Wal-Mart locked their janitorial crew in the store to work. You can't lock your employees in your store and force them to work until morning, can you? The hits just keep coming to Wal-Mart, and McG keeps on defending them.
0 Replies
 
Turner 727
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 03:02 am
kickycan wrote:
Did you hear about the new one? Wal-Mart locked their janitorial crew in the store to work. You can't lock your employees in your store and force them to work until morning, can you? The hits just keep coming to Wal-Mart, and McG keeps on defending them.


You can do anything to anyone if it's in the contract. And don't think for a second wal-mart won't come out of this smelling like roses.

Supposedly, it's for security reasons, so that no one gets in and can hurt them. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
BlueMonkey
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 01:20 pm
Don't protect you get into trouble. Do protect you get into trouble. There is no win.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 06:35 pm
Hmm - this has been an interesting thread to read - and it makes me so glad I live in a country with a history of strong unionism, which has won (in many hard battles) decent minimum working conditions - though these are being eroded as we speak, and people are still exploited when they do not know their rights, or are especially vulnerable.

As with all things, I can see the good and bad about what Walmart does - but the bottom line for me is that when next I come to the States, I will not shop there. I do not knowingly support companies in big, rich countries who exploit their staff.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 07:00 pm
Don't be surprised if Wall-Mart appears in australia. It is attempting to go international.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 07:02 pm
Well, it will have to obey Australian labour laws if it does. And I will be watching it!
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 07:12 pm
One of the ways Wall-Mart gets around labor laws in the US is to have very few full time employees. I do not know what the law is in Australia but many States in the US treat part time employment as different from full time employment and generally part timers have less protection. The company is the gold standard in creative exploitation.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 07:32 pm
Yes - one of the ways in which hard-won protections are being eroded here is by the institutionalisation of part-time work.

Part-time permanent people have the same rights here as full-time - but casuals do not - ie they have no holiday leave, sick leave etc. It was always the case that casuals had higher pay because of this - I spent the first 12 years of my working life, while I was studying, as a casual in hospitality jobs. However, in order to "create employment opportunities for the young and unskilled" there is now an attempt to take away this compensation.

It will be interesting to watch - as it is likely that casualization will slowly impact very negatively on the economy, over time, as it becomes entrenched as a permanent thing - eg, casuals have great trouble getting finance - they cannot buy homes, decent cars etc. Remember, we are a much smaller market for these things than the US. So, even as the rich here are getting richer, more and more people are falling into poverty - and the rich are not, I think, a big enough group to make up the shortfall. At present, we are in boom - so things look good - but the descent into poverty of such a large group of people is likely to have an effect over time. I wonder if capital might begin to take this into account, eventually, in decisions about permanence? As they seem to have re the fashion for constant firings of a few years ago???

Labor governments, while much more right wing than a few years ago, are traditionally much more sympathetic to labour issues (they have a nexus with the unions, just for starters) - and they are in power in ALL states - even though the federal government is deeply conservative.

My own state government, for instance, as soon as it came into power, instructed the education department here to make permanent hundreds of positions that had been casual - for the very reasons I outlined above.

However, if Walmart tries to pay non-legal casual wages here, they will get done - because their history will be known, and they will be being watched. It might take a while, because that sector is poorly unionised, but the department of labour will be looking at them.
0 Replies
 
BlueMonkey
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2004 10:49 pm
You cannot deny the power of Wal-Mart. It grows. It feeds off the hate of the few and gives greatness to the many.

LOL
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2004 03:33 pm
Here's some more funny for the Monkey:

Quote:
Faced with mounting criticism over low pay, sex-discrimination, exploitation of undocumented immigrants, violation of child labor laws and hard-line anti-union tactics, Wal-Mart has tapped its $250 billion in annual revenues to shower conservatives in Washington with money. According to a study by the non-partisan Center for Responsive politics, Wal-Mart is now the second highest contributor to the 2004 elections, having already contributed more than $1 million to federal candidates. Last year, Wal-Mart didn't even rank in the top 100. But, notwithstanding their generosity to "pro-business" politicians, as Wal-Mart aggressively expands - 220 new U.S. supercenters are slated to open this year alone - it is sparking citizen revolts around the country.

Wages for many Wal-Mart employees are so low that many are forced to rely on government assistance - especially for health care. The Seattle Times reports that in Washington state, subsidized insurance for the working poor costs tax payers "several million dollars annually." Some state lawmakers have had enough. Legislation has been that would "force big business to help pay for the state's Basic Health Plan."

The legislation has been nicknamed the "Wal-Mart bill." And not without justification - of those enrolled in the taxpayer-subsidized health plan who are employed, more work at Wal-Mart than anywhere else. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that citizen interest in the bill "drew crowds of people to a hearing last week in Olympia." In Georgia, an AFL-CIO study found 10,000 children of Wal-Mart employees were enrolled in Georgia's public health insurance program...

In California, concerned about the effect that superstores would have on the local economy, the environment and water supply, the Inglewood City Council passed an ordinance banning the construction of stores with over 155,000 square feet of space that sell 20,000 food items. But Wal-Mart "has decided to leapfrog" the City Council, according to the Washington Times. Determined to build a huge store in Inglewood, Wal-Mart introduced a ballot measure that will be voted on on April 6. The initiative would "authorize the entire [Wal-Mart] project without any action from the city."

Wal-Mart has been attempting to win approval for store construction by circumventing public city council meetings and talking to city council members privately. This tactic has raised legal and ethical concerns. In San Marcos, CA there is a call for a grand jury investigation into whether "three council members illegally reached a consensus before a formal vote on plans to build a Wal-Mart in south San Marcos," according to the North County Times. The complaint alleges that, prior to the vote, the three council members met privately with Jack Orr - who was both their "political consultant" and representing Wal-Mart. Orr did not meet with two other council members who voted against the store. Opposition to the store was so fervent that, even after the vote approving the store, San Marcos voters forced a city-wide referendum on the issue, scheduled for March 2.

Wal-Mart used strikingly similar tactics in an attempt to win approval for a store in Grand Island City, NE. The Grand Island Independent reports that "eight council members violated the public's trust by meeting with Wal-Mart officials in individual or group meetings - out of the public's eye and away from city staff and the mayor." After the private meeting, the council "basically gave them what they wanted," breeding "suspicion about what happened behind those doors."


Wal-Mart is corrupting local officials to continue their spreading their examplary business model. Imagine that...
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2004 03:36 pm
PDiddie, do you have a link for that article?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2004 04:20 pm
Sí, Acqui:

The High Price of Wal-Mart
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2004 05:55 pm
Here's the thing I don't understand about Wal-Mart locking its employees in at night, supposedly for their own safety: When I'm at home for the night, I lock the door so no one can enter without my permission. But if I want to leave the house, I can let myself out.

So why, again, does Wal-Mart locks the night shift in so that they can't leave? Perhaps one of the corporate defenders on this thread can explain that...
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2004 06:04 pm
They are paid poorly and are often illegals. They are afraid they will supplement their income by stealing the store's stock.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 10:24 am
Well, that explanation sounds more plausible than Wal-Mart's "We're doing this to protect the employees". Of course, they are...
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 10:46 am
I think everyone should boycott Walmart. Every time shoppers enter that store they are stepping on people all over the world to get there.



Just my opinion, of course, but I will never buy anything from them. Gotta vote with your pocketbook.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 10:49 am
I'll think of that today at lunchtime when I go to Walmart to buy peanut butter...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/08/2025 at 09:25:54