So the point of that was that the author was too stupid to find the paper products aisle? It's the same aisle with 20 different brands of paper towels and 30 different brands of toilet paper. Also, facial tissue can be found in that aisle. They have Kleenex and Puff, and generic , and every other brand...
You would think that someone with enough sense to write and publish an article, would have enough sense to read the huge signs telling him what was in each aisle...
Did you hear about the new one? Wal-Mart locked their janitorial crew in the store to work. You can't lock your employees in your store and force them to work until morning, can you? The hits just keep coming to Wal-Mart, and McG keeps on defending them.
kickycan wrote:Did you hear about the new one? Wal-Mart locked their janitorial crew in the store to work. You can't lock your employees in your store and force them to work until morning, can you? The hits just keep coming to Wal-Mart, and McG keeps on defending them.
You can do anything to anyone if it's in the contract. And don't think for a second wal-mart won't come out of this smelling like roses.
Supposedly, it's for security reasons, so that no one gets in and can hurt them.
Don't protect you get into trouble. Do protect you get into trouble. There is no win.
Hmm - this has been an interesting thread to read - and it makes me so glad I live in a country with a history of strong unionism, which has won (in many hard battles) decent minimum working conditions - though these are being eroded as we speak, and people are still exploited when they do not know their rights, or are especially vulnerable.
As with all things, I can see the good and bad about what Walmart does - but the bottom line for me is that when next I come to the States, I will not shop there. I do not knowingly support companies in big, rich countries who exploit their staff.
Don't be surprised if Wall-Mart appears in australia. It is attempting to go international.
Well, it will have to obey Australian labour laws if it does. And I will be watching it!
One of the ways Wall-Mart gets around labor laws in the US is to have very few full time employees. I do not know what the law is in Australia but many States in the US treat part time employment as different from full time employment and generally part timers have less protection. The company is the gold standard in creative exploitation.
Yes - one of the ways in which hard-won protections are being eroded here is by the institutionalisation of part-time work.
Part-time permanent people have the same rights here as full-time - but casuals do not - ie they have no holiday leave, sick leave etc. It was always the case that casuals had higher pay because of this - I spent the first 12 years of my working life, while I was studying, as a casual in hospitality jobs. However, in order to "create employment opportunities for the young and unskilled" there is now an attempt to take away this compensation.
It will be interesting to watch - as it is likely that casualization will slowly impact very negatively on the economy, over time, as it becomes entrenched as a permanent thing - eg, casuals have great trouble getting finance - they cannot buy homes, decent cars etc. Remember, we are a much smaller market for these things than the US. So, even as the rich here are getting richer, more and more people are falling into poverty - and the rich are not, I think, a big enough group to make up the shortfall. At present, we are in boom - so things look good - but the descent into poverty of such a large group of people is likely to have an effect over time. I wonder if capital might begin to take this into account, eventually, in decisions about permanence? As they seem to have re the fashion for constant firings of a few years ago???
Labor governments, while much more right wing than a few years ago, are traditionally much more sympathetic to labour issues (they have a nexus with the unions, just for starters) - and they are in power in ALL states - even though the federal government is deeply conservative.
My own state government, for instance, as soon as it came into power, instructed the education department here to make permanent hundreds of positions that had been casual - for the very reasons I outlined above.
However, if Walmart tries to pay non-legal casual wages here, they will get done - because their history will be known, and they will be being watched. It might take a while, because that sector is poorly unionised, but the department of labour will be looking at them.
You cannot deny the power of Wal-Mart. It grows. It feeds off the hate of the few and gives greatness to the many.
LOL
Here's some more funny for the Monkey:
Quote:Faced with mounting criticism over low pay, sex-discrimination, exploitation of undocumented immigrants, violation of child labor laws and hard-line anti-union tactics, Wal-Mart has tapped its $250 billion in annual revenues to shower conservatives in Washington with money. According to a study by the non-partisan Center for Responsive politics, Wal-Mart is now the second highest contributor to the 2004 elections, having already contributed more than $1 million to federal candidates. Last year, Wal-Mart didn't even rank in the top 100. But, notwithstanding their generosity to "pro-business" politicians, as Wal-Mart aggressively expands - 220 new U.S. supercenters are slated to open this year alone - it is sparking citizen revolts around the country.
Wages for many Wal-Mart employees are so low that many are forced to rely on government assistance - especially for health care. The
Seattle Times reports that in Washington state, subsidized insurance for the working poor costs tax payers "several million dollars annually." Some state lawmakers have had enough. Legislation has been that would "force big business to help pay for the state's Basic Health Plan."
The legislation has been nicknamed the "Wal-Mart bill." And not without justification - of those enrolled in the taxpayer-subsidized health plan who are employed, more work at Wal-Mart than anywhere else. The Seattle
Post-Intelligencer reported that citizen interest in the bill "drew crowds of people to a hearing last week in Olympia." In Georgia, an
AFL-CIO study found 10,000 children of Wal-Mart employees were enrolled in Georgia's public health insurance program...
In California, concerned about the effect that superstores would have on the local economy, the environment and water supply, the Inglewood City Council passed an ordinance banning the construction of stores with over 155,000 square feet of space that sell 20,000 food items. But Wal-Mart "has decided to leapfrog" the City Council, according to the
Washington Times. Determined to build a huge store in Inglewood, Wal-Mart introduced a ballot measure that will be voted on on April 6. The initiative would "authorize the entire [Wal-Mart] project without any action from the city."
Wal-Mart has been attempting to win approval for store construction by circumventing public city council meetings and talking to city council members privately. This tactic has raised legal and ethical concerns. In San Marcos, CA there is a call for a grand jury investigation into whether "three council members illegally reached a consensus before a formal vote on plans to build a Wal-Mart in south San Marcos," according to the North County
Times. The complaint alleges that, prior to the vote, the three council members met privately with Jack Orr - who was both their "political consultant" and representing Wal-Mart. Orr did not meet with two other council members who voted against the store. Opposition to the store was so fervent that, even after the vote approving the store, San Marcos voters forced a city-wide referendum on the issue, scheduled for March 2.
Wal-Mart used strikingly similar tactics in an attempt to win approval for a store in Grand Island City, NE. The
Grand Island Independent reports that "eight council members violated the public's trust by meeting with Wal-Mart officials in individual or group meetings - out of the public's eye and away from city staff and the mayor." After the private meeting, the council "basically gave them what they wanted," breeding "suspicion about what happened behind those doors."
Wal-Mart is corrupting local officials to continue their spreading their examplary business model. Imagine
that...
PDiddie, do you have a link for that article?
Here's the thing I don't understand about Wal-Mart locking its employees in at night, supposedly for their own safety: When I'm at home for the night, I lock the door so no one can enter without my permission. But if I want to leave the house, I can let myself out.
So why, again, does Wal-Mart locks the night shift in so that they can't leave? Perhaps one of the corporate defenders on this thread can explain that...
They are paid poorly and are often illegals. They are afraid they will supplement their income by stealing the store's stock.
Well, that explanation sounds more plausible than Wal-Mart's "We're doing this to protect the employees". Of course, they are...
I think everyone should boycott Walmart. Every time shoppers enter that store they are stepping on people all over the world to get there.
Just my opinion, of course, but I will never buy anything from them. Gotta vote with your pocketbook.
I'll think of that today at lunchtime when I go to Walmart to buy peanut butter...