Creation, of course.
The theory of evolution started with the idea that species "evolve". The meaning of this word "evolution" in those years was "developing, unfolding, changing from worst, simple and lower into better, more complex and higher.
The theory of evolution hold these ideas centuries after Darwin, who also stated that "...natural selection acts SOLELY by accumulating slight, succesive, favourable variations, it can produce no great or sudden modification, it can act ONLY by very short and slow steps." (emphasis mine).
In the 70's, evolutionists found out that these ideas were completely against reality, and the "Neo-Darwinian" theory was invented. The new theory evolution changed 99% of the old one, and only the title and some key terms were saved. The Neo-Darwinian theory accepted that species can degenerate and that can have sudden noticeable changes, and this part was against Darwin -who speculated SOLELY favourable and ONLY short slow steps-.
Still, the theory was a contradiction to reality, the argument against the meaning of the word "evolution" in the title of the theory was not only irrelevant but a nonsense. The reason was that "evolution " still means unfolding, changing from worst to better, etc...
Evolutionists performed another change, and they -with absolute right- made the word "evolution" a technical term to be used solely in Biology. This technical term "evolution" will simply mean "change". So, now evolutionists enjoy the luxury to say that their theory finally can go in accord to reality, by having the technical term "evolution" used in its title as simply "change".
But, evolutionists never win... it happens that the verb "evolve" still having the original meaning. You can't change the meaning of the verb "evolve" because "evolve" means a change with a fixed arrow, that is unfolding, from worst to better, etc. You just can't say that when a city changed cell phones by the old telegraph, that this city has "evolved" its communication system, right?
The verb "evolve" still is the same and can't be changed. So, when evolutionists say that a species lost some characteristics, that this species has "evolved", such is JARGON. The species might have passed through a step in "evolution" (the tecnical word) but you can't say that this species have "evolved" because technical words cannot be used as verbs.
Here is an example. Lets use the word "Penguin" as a technical word to define the birth of a volcano. After earthquakes and changes in the area, you can't by any means, say that the volcano "penguined" when you saw its birth and coming up from ground spreading lava everywhere.
It is accepted without arguments, that people who use JARGON are people who want to deceive others. Evolutionists use JARGON, and this is enough evidence that whatever they say is a lie.
On the other hand, Creation is 100% accurate. The most popular book about creation is the Bible, and the bible states that species, and even planet earth are decaying. And this argument goes 100% in accord with reality.
By observation, the older stars produced and recycled heavy elements, from here, the new stars DO NOT PRODUCE but solely recycle heavy elements and produce heavy metals. From here, planets DO NOT PRODUCE NEITHER RECYCLE heavy elements and heavy metals, but recycle metals.
The arrow of the entire universe is decay, and species can't go against the continued decaying of the elements, so the Bible is correct, by consequence, Creation rules.