6
   

Study finds victim's race can skew death sentences in No.Carolina

 
 
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 09:11 am
July 23, 2010
Study finds victim's race can skew death sentences in N.C.
By Anne Blythe | The (Raleigh) News & Observer

Someone accused of killing a white person in North Carolina is nearly three times as likely to get the death penalty than someone accused of killing a black person, according to a study released Thursday by two researchers who looked at death sentences over a 28-year period.

The findings come as many in North Carolina are focusing on the death penalty and race. Death-row inmates have only a few more weeks to file challenges to their sentences under the Racial Justice Act approved by the legislature last year.

For the study, touted as one of the most comprehensive examinations to date of the modern administration of the death penalty in North Carolina, Michael L. Radelet, a sociology professor at the University of Colorado in Boulder, and Glenn L. Pierce, a research scientist in the Northeastern University school of criminology and criminal justice in Boston, examined 15,281 homicides in the state between Jan. 1, 1980, and Dec. 31, 2007. Of those, 368 resulted in death sentences.
Quantcast

The researchers looked at many factors, such as the number of victims and whether other crimes such as burglaries and robberies were committed during the homicide. They also tried to consider similar homicide cases.

Their analysis of the data showed that the odds of receiving a death sentence in cases where the victim was white were 2.96 times as high as the odds in cases with black victims.

"It's just kind of baffling that, in this day and age, race matters," Radelet said.

Jay Ferguson, a defense lawyer in Durham, said the study found what others have shown - that it's not so much the race of the defendant, but the race of the victim, that determines the punishment.

"I think, over the years, the white-victim cases seem to get more attention in the criminal justice system," Ferguson said. "They seem to get more attention from the district attorneys and the juries. The legislature has made it clear that if we're going to have a death penalty in North Carolina, it's got to be colorblind. And these studies show it's not."

At a standstill

Executions in North Carolina have been on hold for roughly three years. A push to stop doctors from assisting in executions, and a lawsuit filed by some death row inmates challenging the use of lethal injections as cruel and unusual punishment, have created a de facto moratorium.

And last summer, the legislature passed the Racial Justice Act, one of only two laws of its kind in the nation. The law allows judges, for the first time, to consider statistical evidence that suggests race was a key factor in prosecutors' seeking, or a court's imposing, the death penalty on a disproportionate number of people from a racial group.

Current death row inmates have until Aug. 10 to file their challenges.

Ammo for critics

The study released Thursday will help bolster the case of death penalty critics, who for years have complained that capital punishment is applied with bias, intentional or not.

"This definitely vindicates the legislature's passing of the Racial Justice Act," said Tye Hunter, executive director of the Center for Death Penalty Litigation in Durham. "Studies like this all point in the same direction. They point to race discrimination in the South."

Not just N.C.

Radelet, who has studied the administration of the death penalty in 10 states, including Florida, California and Nebraska, said the findings about North Carolina tended to mirror findings from most other states. In Florida, he said, the odds were slightly higher that a person accused of killing a white person would get the death penalty compared to cases when the victim was black. In Nebraska, though, the odds were lower.

"It turns out the racial biases tend to be lower where there are not as many death sentences," Radelet said.

Prosecutor: No bias

Seth Edwards, a prosecutor in Martin, Washington, Tyrrell, Hyde and Beaufort counties who took over this month as president of the N.C. Conference of District Attorneys, said after a brief review of the study that prosecutors consider many factors when deciding whether to pursue a capital homicide case.

"I strongly disagree with the implication that prosecutors base their decision to seek the ultimate punishment on the race of the victim or the defendant," Edwards said in an e-mail message. "Prosecutors do not look at skin color. We consider lots of things, but race is not one of them."

Radelet and Pierce, the study authors, encouraged "continuous monitoring of the death penalty in North Carolina to see if patterns of racial bias change."

Read more: http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/07/23/593942/victims-race-skews-death-penalty.html#ixzz0uWCuFEXh
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 09:37 am
I thought this was widely known to be true across all states that implement the death penalty.

0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 11:24 am
I have always thought that it would be interesting to try capital cases with two juries, one in the court as usual and the other sequestered, but able to see any photographic or physical evidence on a large screen accompanied by sub-titles of the testimony and any other statements made in the courtroom.

There would be a slight delay between the open court jury and what was seen in the sequestered jury room in order to remove from the testimony any mention of any person's race or ethnicity.

The sequestered jury would not see any of the participants, not the accused, not any witnesses for the prosecution, not even the judge trying the case. They would base their verdict on the evidence presented and the testimony made.

I wonder how made trials would have split decisions.

Joe(I knew the minute I laid eyes on him, he was guilty.)Nation

wandeljw
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 11:32 am
From the article provided by BBB:
Quote:
Seth Edwards, a prosecutor in Martin, Washington, Tyrrell, Hyde and Beaufort counties who took over this month as president of the N.C. Conference of District Attorneys, said after a brief review of the study that prosecutors consider many factors when deciding whether to pursue a capital homicide case.

"I strongly disagree with the implication that prosecutors base their decision to seek the ultimate punishment on the race of the victim or the defendant," Edwards said in an e-mail message. "Prosecutors do not look at skin color. We consider lots of things, but race is not one of them."

Radelet and Pierce, the study authors, encouraged "continuous monitoring of the death penalty in North Carolina to see if patterns of racial bias change."


Prosecutors always deny patterns of racial bias, even when confronted with study after study. This is part of the reason why the problem continues today.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 03:56 pm
@Joe Nation,
Joe Nation , What a unique idea!

BBB
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 04:13 pm
Old news. No justice - just us.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 04:14 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

Old news. No justice - just us.


Since at least the Civil War.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 04:20 pm
why this must be poppycock, there's been no racism in the US since the civil rights act in 1964. racism is against the law.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 01:07 am
I would not have thought that the race of the victim would have made that big a difference in the punishment.

It is good that they passed the Racial Justice Act. It was obviously needed.

Interesting that if you remove the death penalty from the equation that the racial gap narrows.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Study finds victim's race can skew death sentences in No.Carolina
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:16:31