@Fatal Freedoms,
Reply to fatal freedoms :
No you neglect the fact that abstinence ALSO leads to the possibility of unsafe sex, more-so than those who use protection, this is what the entire article was about had you bothered to read it.
That article was a lie-based non-sensical load of rubbish. It was not Truth-based. Masturbation is what I said, not abstinence. However, neither of these lead to sexual intercourse between the opposite sexes.
masturbation does absolutely nothing to diminish the occurrence of unsafe sex, and many who frequently have unsafe sex also masturbate.
Incorrect and inferior answer, FF.
A) Masturbating clearly does reduce the frequency of intercourse-sex. For example, some humans want sex. They have sex, using masturbation method. They are satisfied. They go home rather than to look for more sex in other forms, such as intercourse with a female.
B) You miss the obvious : That society has promoted and advertised intercourse-based sex as part of its primary brainwashing and indoctorinatin programme.
That possibility always exists, even with abstinence according to the studies.
Those studies are done by inferiors who are already brainwashed by society. They are inferior and lie-based. They are wrong.
But most females who masturbate also have sex, the fact of the matter is that the vast majority of people simply don't have the will power to ONLY masturbate and so when people do have sex it is better to have protected sex. Abstinence simply is not realistic or effective.
The Superior, such as Myself, always has 100% willpower. It is not possible for any other human to influence the core True Reality and will of the Superior. Once example of this is Charles Manson. It is a fact that despite years of beatings, prison guards have been unable to influence Charles' mind-set or break Charles in any way. As one guard put it "We might as well be thrashing a dead horse." Once the Superior "locks" something in his Superior Mind, no amount of torture, suggestion, arguement, confinement etc can weaken it.
Society has both diminished the mental strength and increased the pressure on humans, especially young humans, to have sexual intercourse with other humans of the opposite sex. Although I would agree that using a condom is always preferable to not, that is not where the Truth is. I also would agree that abstinence is not effective for most humans, but again that is not where the Truth is.
The only reason why we have increased sexual-intercourse, and inability to mentally control mental actions is because of society in the first place. Society controls inferiors.
People did not have less sex before the advent of the condom, they just had more kids.
That is incorrect, although I point out that the advent of the condom is not the marker. It is the formation of human society that is the beginning of the increases.
People have the same amount of sex they do today as they did 200 years ago, you're listening to too much media, you're promoting a popular myth un-based in fact.
The Superior is never biased. Simply put, humans are under more pressure and have sexual intercourse between the sexes a lot more than natural levels. That is because osciety promotes same.
During early colonial times it was not uncommon for people to have 6 or 7 kids if not more. This is the trend we see in virtually every undeveloped nation. same amount of sex but more kids.
These are all human societies that promote same. Even so, there is more sex today on average, than in colonial times.
Seer TT : "No, it is just common sense. The mating frequency that most humans have is much higher than natural levels. This is because they are
NOT mating for natural reasons most of the time. The lie that a condom can protect you has increasesd the intercourse frequency to much higher levels than before. Your animal pictures mean nothing. "
And what statistics do you have to support this?
{Red = correction of statement. Quote was correct, original had red word ommitted}.
Statistics are not required. Anyway, I am sure that statistics would say that there is an increase, as the various TV news shows always quote them. The Truth has nothing to do with the statistics in sex issues, no mater who they favour. One reason is over 99% of humans do not know what sex is.
You can be more specific. You refer to the condom statement? Increased mating claim?
As convincing as this may be, you've not supported you're statement with anything but grandiose assertions. Nor is this supported by the evidence.
I have not attemted to make a very solid case, mainly because I am not trying to convince you of anything. The idea that humans are not mating for natural/procreation reasons seemed obvious in the extreme to Me. Of course, there was an error in the sentence in the original post. If you have a specific Q, I will answer.
You said animals generally don't mate year round, and I've given you evidence that this is in fact not true. I've given you numerous examples. Many animals do mate year round.
I know. That is why I said generally. It might be possible to determine if humans mate all year round in nature, but I dont think that would really matter. I just did not need pictures of those animals. Your sentence above is enough.
But like usual I'm sure you won't admit you were wrong. denial, denial, denial.
I never meant that
all animals do not mate all year round. However, in general, it is a fact that non-human species have a mating season. There may be some example of some plant, fish, mammal that does not. But that is a part of it's natural and normal reproduction cycle. I just will not go into detail, because that point is rather moot by the point that humans will have sexual-intercourse sex between the sexes when they do not want to procreate. That is proven by the wearing of condoms. The Truth is that humans do not have thier natural mating instincts intact.
Giraffe, for example, mate based largely on enviromental and food conditions etc. So, they still have a natural seasonal mating. They tenf to mate at a certain time of year much more than other times. Moot point. Giraffes have been in regular contact with humans, and therefore are not a reliable measure of natural instinct. Humans clearly "mate" due to expectation, to "get ahead", peer pressures etc and use condoms. Hardly natural instinctual behaviour.
Seer TT : "Another facet of this is the demonisation of homosexuals by society. Why does soicety do this? Because homosexuals cannot have offspring."
Because your last sentences were irrelevant to the point I was making. I didn't say anything about bisexuals or homosexuals, so there was no point in responding to it.
It is relavent to the point I am making. Human societal leaders promote sexual intercourse between the sexes
because they want to increase the number of citizen-slaves available. That is why the culture in soceties that promote "mating" and "breeding" demonise homosexuals.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace