1
   

Gods Porn

 
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 01:58 pm
@FedUpAmerican,
In my heart it does. Love to me is the absense of hate. Like dark is the absense of light, cold is the absence of heat.
0 Replies
 
FedUpAmerican
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 02:34 pm
@FedUpAmerican,
Belief in fantasy is the absence of common sense
FedUpAmerican
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 02:38 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;36382 wrote:
if you don't understand it after this


It's not a matter of understanding, it's a matter of not believing in whatever it is you're spreading. :no:

BTW, I thought it was against forum guidelines to TRY to convert someone to anothers way of thinking.

It doesn't matter though. I don't really care what you're TRYING to do. I just don't believe in what you're saying.

Do YOU understand???
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 03:00 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;36372 wrote:
The concept of a 300ft clitoris isn't "that than which no greater can be concieved". If the concept of "that than which no greater can be concieved" exists in the imaginary, and reality is greater than imaginary, logically the concept must also exist in the reality.



a 300 ft Clitoris is "that than which no greater than can be conceived"

a 400 ft clitoris would just be silly.


See where I went with that, it was setup really,

"Who created god"

MAN did

Thus Humans are the actual definition you use to describe God.
markx15
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 03:24 pm
@FedUpAmerican,
If man had created God he would be as real as anything else we create. Man percieved God, in many things, some which have been "debunked", and no longer represent what man believes to be God. There are many ways of looking at the same thing, you can't have an absolute truth when there are only opinions.
0 Replies
 
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 10:13 pm
@FedUpAmerican,
FedUpAmerican;36403 wrote:
It's not a matter of understanding, it's a matter of not believing in whatever it is you're spreading. :no:

BTW, I thought it was against forum guidelines to TRY to convert someone to anothers way of thinking.

It doesn't matter though. I don't really care what you're TRYING to do. I just don't believe in what you're saying.

Do YOU understand???


Then you reject contemporary logic.

So you were NOT attempting to convince Christians that their faith included elements of pornography?

Simple fact is that you are so anti-Christian (as am I) that you refuse to investigate other avenues of thought. My position is logically correct, most everybody else seemed to understand it but you, so it would appear that you did NOT understand. Pity.


My argument can be contested by questioning whether or not reality really is greater than the imaginary, but you chose instead to deny that you comprehend the definition of "god". At this point, I think we can end this discussion, because your mind is just as closed as the religious zealots whom I can safely assume you dislike.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 10:14 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;36406 wrote:
a 300 ft Clitoris is "that than which no greater than can be conceived"

a 400 ft clitoris would just be silly.


See where I went with that, it was setup really,

"Who created god"

MAN did

Thus Humans are the actual definition you use to describe God.


"God" is not a human, just like "chair" is not a human. Both concepts are created by man yes, but neither ARE men.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 10:18 pm
@FedUpAmerican,
FedUpAmerican;36402 wrote:
Belief in fantasy is the absence of common sense

So what proof do you have in the way of Atheism? Hmmm, that's what i thought.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 11:23 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;36508 wrote:
So what proof do you have in the way of Atheism? Hmmm, that's what i thought.


Atheism has no logical basis, as I have demonstrated. Agnosticism is simply the stance of reasonable people, "not enough proof to convince me, but open to the possibility". I can respect agnostics.
0 Replies
 
FedUpAmerican
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 04:15 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;36504 wrote:
Then you reject contemporary logic.


No I just reject YOUR logic.

Quote:


So you were NOT attempting to convince Christians that their faith included elements of pornography?



I don't convince Christians of ANYTHING

Quote:


Simple fact is that you are so anti-Christian (as am I) that you refuse to investigate other avenues of thought. My position is logically correct, most everybody else seemed to understand it but you, so it would appear that you did NOT understand. Pity.


Pity? Because I don't conform with the crowd? LOL!

Like I said, not a matter of comprehension.

Quote:

My argument can be contested by questioning whether or not reality really is greater than the imaginary, but you chose instead to deny that you comprehend the definition of "god".


WRONG AGAIN. I just refuse to accept YOUR comprehension of God.

Quote:


At this point, I think we can end this discussion, because your mind is just as closed as the religious zealots whom I can safely assume you dislike.


I agree we should end the discussion but NOT because you think my mind is closed. I just think that your not representing MY version of God.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 07:26 pm
@Freeman15,
Freeman15;36505 wrote:
"God" is not a human, just like "chair" is not a human. Both concepts are created by man yes, but neither ARE men.


Thanks for clearing up millions of years of human struggle to find meaning in life. If only you could have been around back in the dang old day of the hunter-gatherer.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 01:47 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;36942 wrote:
Thanks for clearing up millions of years of human struggle to find meaning in life. If only you could have been around back in the dang old day of the hunter-gatherer.


I'm not sure if that is sarcasm or not, so I don't know whether to high-five you or flip you the bird.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 08:26 am
@FedUpAmerican,
Lol!!
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 09:59 am
@FedUpAmerican,
Pinochet is a Texan, Flipping the Bird IS a High Five down here.
Freeman15
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 01:11 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;37030 wrote:
Pinochet is a Texan, Flipping the Bird IS a High Five down here.


Yeah. Gotta love home.
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Sep, 2007 01:17 pm
@Freeman15,
:fu2: Haha
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gods Porn
  3. » Page 5
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 04:55:25