@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;27147 wrote:What you're missing here is that sexual morality is a living breathing entity with a life of it's own. What was forbidden only one generation ago is now fair game. The fact that in ancient Greece they diddled small boys has no relevance today.
Okay, Jesus was a living, breathing entity, too, before they killed him. Are we to say he has no relevance today?
Not trolling, I'm just putting the shoe on another foot. If we apply that logic to other things, we find it doesn't really hold up. It was socially acceptable then, and it's not now. True. But does that mean it's wrong? I think it's just a matter of opinion. It's another issue about freedom. If a fifteen year old wants someone to spoink her, whose business is that? Or more importantly, why is it okay for little johnny, who is also fifteen, to do it, but not still-little andy, who just turned 18? Or better yet, what if she got married to him? It's absolutely possible. Check out the
age at which you can get married in various states, either with or without parental consent, depending on your age.
I guess it's okay to have sex with someone fifteen, as long as you're married, right? Sex with minors is only okay if it's not pre-marital.
It's moral duplicity. Either she should be able to do it, or she shouldn't. All these restrictions you're putting on a girl who is sexually mature is just a way to take freedom away from people and force them to abide by your views of morality. You can't argue it's anything more than culture -- and that's where our example of the Greeks comes in. To prove that point.