@politically-wrong,
Hey Mr. Politically-Wrong
Nice to hear from you again. Mazel Tov, my brother.
Quote:well i hope i deserve this much credit loools
I'm just happy to meet a muslim I can rationally discuss all this with. So, in my book - you deserve credit.
Quote:an important aim for me is to separate the word Jihad from being mentioned in the same breath with extremism, Islam say's the hardest type of jihad is a word of honesty and truth in the face of a tyrant ( thats one understanding of jihad thats been missing) .
That ties in well with the link I posted in my comment to Sword of god - The link was by the same guy he quoted. After reading the article and hearing your words - I'll join you in that, my friend. Hirabah, then. Does that work with you? Or what is your suggestion to replace "Jihad" in the description of what the hundreds of thousands of people who refer to themselves as Jihadists should be?? I like your interpretation for jihad - I prefer a Word over a Sword any day, myself. There is an old saying in the west that "the pen is mightier than the sword". ((mostly only when there is free speach!)) Personally, I like the pen, but I also have a sword - and I pray God allow my aim to be true.
Quote:
(JoJoJams)I'm pleasantly surprised to hear of your (and many of your friends) "hatred towards beards", due to thinking they could be government agents. No matter a persons (or nations) religion, those darn "governments" and "politicians" can sure be a pain. So, we share a commonality there! A distrust of government!! ;-)
(Politically-Wrong)
Apparently yes, and if it came to be known around here what am doing online i am not so sure what can possibly happen.
And there is a part of me that worries for you - man to man - friend to friend - brother to brother - knowing the possibilites of what could happen to you where you are at (Sudan). However, since your arguing in favor of Islam - that's most definitely in your favor. It's just your interpretation some of them might have problems with - and I'd hate to see anything happen to you. Do you all (the average citizen) have the right to bear arms over there? For all the propaganda to the contrary, truly - no one here in America (joe average citizen) is
ever afraid of a "knock in the night" and being hauled off somewhere for intterogation. ~ Just for using the internet and speaking their mind. But you're Muslim - so you'll more than likely be aok in Sudan. Are you a Sudanese of African or Arabic descent?
Quote:this is absolutely wrong , it shouldnot have happened , personaly am not sure what Islam say's about what to do in such a case (the cartoons ) but violence against those who had nothing to do with it is surely out of the pic, regarding the one who made the cartoons i wish i can understand what was he trying to accomplish, btw i never till date saw those cartoons.
Personally, I'd blame the riots and murders on the Imams and mad mullahs - riling up the people - and over-blowing the charges. The cartoonists (and the paper) were trying to do what they do for every other government, political entity or religion.... ONE picture, to make a political/theological/ideological statement and get people THINKING!!!!! The worst one printed in the paper was an image of your prophet with a turban that looked like a bomb. That was all. And what it was meant to convey is EXACTLY what you have experienced here by people - TRYING to show that the teachings mohammed taught -- are used by those that would blow up schools, busses, hotels, and nightclubs. And, of course, the muslim worlds gets mad at us for pointing that out. In the west, the cartoon would have been an opening for DIALOGUE to talk about the realities of what is going on in the name of your prophet and your god. Instead of talking about it MAN to MAN - as you and I are doing here, a large chunk of the Muslim world instead gets mad, riots and kills people -- Because we're trying to point out what is being done in the name of your prophet and your god. you and I have already covered that point of interpretation though.
Quote:Add to that defending Islamic nations against invasions and occupation( am sure you know what am refering to), regardless of whether that nations exists in the same continent as i , or the said invasion or conflict happened during my life time, its irrelevant to me ( i say this because a couple of members were trying to convince me otherwise) .
And while I hear where you are coming from - (in both instances) - understand this:
People gripe and scream that we "created" or "support" those in power over you, (even though it's just been trying to pick the "lesser of two evils" in who can be a "friend" in the world/nations scene - letting them run themselves! instead of running things for them) BUT, when we go in and take one of the pieces of sh1t out, and try to give you a chance to run it yourselves, "We, the People..." you all STILL scream bloody at us!! lol-- we are truly "damned if we do, and damned if we don't". Now - here's something I'm sure we both can agree on. In the first war against saddam, my government promised many citizens of Iraq who wanted hussein out that we would help them if they rose up and revolted, while we liberated Kuwait (see - we've fought for muslims many times). Many people rose up --- and my contrey abondoned them. After Kuwait, we left ((So friggin much for OCCUPATION and "INVADERS!!" and "STEALING THE OIL@!!)) ~ But we abondoned good men and women who wanted to be free.... Saddam, of course. then began a retribution against those we urged to rise up....and then we abandoned.
We should have continued on to Baghdad that first time and took the s.o.b. out -- We then would already have been done and gone - and Iraq would be a whole different country with a muslim equivalent of "We...the people" running it.
Quote:what do you assume i felt like? hatred pure and simple , if there was a way i could bankrupt that news paper i would have done it, and this is because am not sure what Islam say's to do in this case bankruptcy feels like a least thing to repay the news paper.
if it had been some other religions prophet attacked they would have repayed with doing the same to Jesus (pbuh) but as a muslim i wouldnot do that since i believe him to be a prophet from God too .
Ummm - you really are unfamiliar with the west then, huh? Do you know that over ten years ago there was a display of "art" at a New York museum, the artist paid for by tax payer dollars!, where an up-side-down crucifix was in a jar of urine??>>??? Christians complained loudly, for sure, but the "left" and "liberals" said it was art and we should get over it. Don't look if we don't like it. Christians didn't riot in the streets and kill people, though. So, you see, this is a big difference between the two religions. What's funny is those same lefties today in American were too afraid to reprint the mohammed cartoons - lol. Because they were afraid. They're not afraid to mock Christians, though. Because the judeao-christian God is one of love. And really, ultimately -- He can fight his own battles. I don't need to get offended for him and do judgment in his staid - it's up to HIM and the lost individual, whom I'll pray for. See, my God is a bigger God.....He doesn't take offense at cartoons. Politically-Wrong, don't you realize that what I have said here in these post is WORSE than the cartoon fiasco and the pope's comment, and even Theo VanGogh's documentary, combined, BY FAR!!! ~ So, since you've told me how you feel about them, how do you feel about me??? Why is it that Muslims believe Christians are incorrect to venerate Jesus "too much" - for believing him the perfect man - God come down in the flesh to experience what we experience, so he can more better, fairly judge due to "walking in our shoes", but then they can themselves venerate a mere man, just as (or more) than God - and riot and kill over an alleged
"blashpemy" ((a friggin CARTOON!!))??
Don't you see the problem there, my friend??
Quote:the west must put all sacred stuff under some federal law protection
No way - ridiculous. God can help himself. It's not Him being offended ~ it's
you who are offended..... And the best way is rationally, logically and calmly debating the issues - as you and I are doing here. ALL things should be open for discussion. Again, seeking and asking uncomfortable questions, doesn't bother God. Why should it bother you?? Let God deal with it and pray for the lost persons soul. Hate the sin - love the sinner. - It isn't our place to mete judgement.
Did God or mohammed tell you he was offended by those cartoons?? Or are you merely offended yourself because someone calls in to question the fondations of your belief??
If your beliefs are truly solid and "true" - you have no need to be offended and can laugh in a mockers face. However, if the foundation of your belief and religion is truly weak, spiritually, and groundless in theology, logic, and reason - well - then I suppose you would get offended and want to riot, kill, and shut up the person you disagree with.
And yet again a real difference between the Judeao-Christain and Islamic beliefs surfaces......
The cartoons were meant to open dialogue to try to come to an understanding of how islam DOES contribute to the terror we are seeing in the world today, and instead of rationally discussing it - as you and I are doing here - others rioted in the streets and killed innocent people, and the rest screamed at us that how DARE we say the "religion of peace" has any ties to terror. It really is mind boggling, actually.....
Quote:I mean if you think that I will say in answer to the movie this van fellow directed that he has a right to express himself then you are totally mistaken , what he has terribly insulted without logic or necessity is sacred to me , which means its more valuable to me than my own life , if the west intends to live peacefully with the moderate parts of islam such things must not happen( van’s movie- the cartoons) these things are too sacred to me to give a **** about freedom of speech , hell its more important to me than life it self for get some law, and that guy van he had it coming., there are many many critics of islam , as your self jojo , but do you think I will look at that van fellow the same way as you? NO.
Did you see it?? The gist of it was:: naked women in translucent scarfs - and all over their bodies were quranic scripture quoting how woman are to be beaten and kept down, they're opinion half that of a man - they are stupid, etc. - How they are OPPRESSED in muslim societies, due to quranic scripture and sharia law. Maybe you can't see his point, being a muslim man. The woman in his film were all ex-muslims. It was all real - and all to OPEN DIALOGUE -- OPEN EYES!!!--- OPEN MINDS!! To real truth....
But you fail to see that and hate him -- because you've been told to hate him -- and you never even saw what he did. lolol- - still you were offended. It kind of scares me,
brother, because what I have said here on this sight is FAR worse then all three events (cartoons, pope, VanGogh) combined....
What you fail to see, in your indoctrinated hatred (because you've never even seen the cartoons or the documentary! You were only told what to believe!) and false "honor" is that NONE of them were mocking you!! They were trying to open eyes and start dialogue. To help people to GROW UP past primitive misogynistic theocratically enforced b.s.
But you all feel you are sooooo right, that how dare anyone question it!!
Dude, respect is EARNED - not coerced and forced. And it's earned by logic, reason and decency. Not by rioting, killing and governmentally enforced "hate crimes" laws. Mr. VanGogh did NOT have it coming!!! He did it to stand up to the TYRANTS in ISLAM, hoping to
help WOMAN of ISLAM. The woman in the film were ex-muslims who wanted real freedom - most beat and abused. ((oh, and don't start about the west's stats on this - just look at the log in your own eye for this part....that's all we're saying)) Free up (TRULY free up)) the other 50% of your population, along with separation of mosque and state, and you will excell as well!! But instead, some of you would just rather shut up the one opening that dialogue....well, kill them. You say you won't look at me like VanGogh - but what I've said throughout this intelligent, reasonable debate is FAR worse than what the people you hate and condemn did. I'm sorry - this is all just too convoluted for me to grasp your mindset....
Quote:may be true but it remains to be wrongful interpretation, as a muslim i can live peacefully with a christian neighbour , hell i can marry his daughter, if Islam allows astrocities against them why would it allow us to marry into them?
Ummmm, because when you marry into them, you demand she convert to Islam?? lol--- COme on!! With all you've said so far, anyone reading this KNOWS that if you took a christian girl home to momma and poppa - it would be demanded she convert. - lol ;-) you're funny, bro! :-)
Check out those two site links in previous posts of mine for all the quranic scripture relating to how anything is permitted against an infidel. And it's all from ex-muslims. Seriously - I think you seem like a good guy. maybe they can help open your eyes. Or, if your faith is strong enough....maybe you can convince them they are wrong. They're all definitely more versed in the quran then I, since they were indoctrinated from birth in it - so you'll have a much harder time with them than me. Still, if you felt spiritually up to it, it could help open your eyes -- if you aren't afraid to see what they say, that is.....
Quote:man that Mullah is waaaaaaay off base , can you tell me where was that? i mean the country.
It was in England - and granted, he was an English convert speaking it in English - and yes, I know, unfortunately too many madrassas are supported and run by the wahabbi sect.... I know this. Still - they comprise millions and are gaining in numbers (people always flock to evil it seems). Would you like to join me in countering their interpretations?? (please)
Quote:are you trying to tell me the conditions in the west are comparable to those in Gaza and the left bank? am not condoning naming streets after murderers, but if you are going to refer to that conflict we better take it from the begenning.
I know all about that conflict - in many of it's facets. Too much for here -- we can chat on that some other day, some other thread. My comment still stands, as is, for all to see:: When someone commits a crime in the west and says God told them to do it, we take them to a psychiatric ward. When someone in the west bank or gaza says god told them to kill a bunch of people by blowing them up - they name streets after them.
Quote:big misunderstanding here my friend, am not trying to tell any one that they are wrong , you (and every citizen of the US except the politicians) have every right to view Islam as you do, whenever you turn on your TV you can see and hear news of sick deeds by people calling themselves muslims, you can see suicidal attacks against civilians in Israel and sometimes the US and UK, you listen to statistics regarding the 911 attacks and so on, its perfectly understandable , and since we ( as those representing true Islam ) are unable to convey to you( as US citizens in your homes and life) our stance and understanding and mentality , this becomes our shortcoming, not your misunderstanding or wrongfullness (spl) , about telling the extremists they are wrong do you really believe they will amend their way's?
YES!!!! Just as we've marginalized the KKK and our own "extremists"!!! By standing up to them -- telling them EN MASSE that they are WRONG and FIGHTING against them!!! ((Didn't you say something earlier about "speaking truth in the face of a tyrant"?!?!)) My GOD man!!! It's (allegedly) only 1% of muslims that are extremists!!! You don't think the other BILLION people can't stand up and stop those 1%??!?? If you all WANTED to ---you could....It's as simple as that.
Quote: , also do you think that it is easy to uproot the extremists roots? their financing ?
Well, those supporting and financing it are what, another 20 - 30% of muslims?? That still leaves a majority of people like you, who SHOULD stand up to the rest. Hey, in my life, when I've been at parties and someone cracked a racial joke - I always soundly put them in their place - DESPITE being out numbered. Why can't you all do the same?? Hell, all you reasonable muslims aren't even outnumbered!! Stand up to them! If God is on your side, there is nothing to be afraid of..... Speak TRUTH to TYRANNY - as you yourself stated.....
Quote:do you think it is easy to discredit their propaganda that is daily gaining because of hate crimes commited against ordinary muslims across the globe?
My brother, the propaganda IS that hate crimes are committed daily against ordinary muslims across the globe.....***sigh** and the mad-mullahs and power hungry imams will blow ANYTHING out of proportion, (like a cartoon or a comment (which was true) by the pope, and in lieue of any REAL event, they will create or make one up.... On the cartoon controversy - the imams/mullahs from Finland inserted their own cartoons in the batch - that were TRULY offensive. they created them -- taqiyya -- to rile the masses. -- but truth is, the worst one was a pic of mohammed with a turban that looked like a bomb-- that was all..... That is how islam has spread since it's inception. By deception, taqiyya, and the sword. Riling the masses with propaganda and lies, and promises of virgins in paradise....
Quote:and in particular Iraq and Palestine!!
Iraq - the worst atrociteis are between Shia and Sunni. You all condemn us for supporting hussein (like in their war with Iran) and condemn us for "supporting" all these terrible dictators -- but if we go in and take them out for you, to try to help you build your own autonomous nation of "We...the people" ...well - hey -- you condemn us still....
Other than us infidels curling up and dying, is there anything that pleases the muslim masses??
Quote:you must also remember that what you call moderate muslims and i call muslims (without moderate) are being oppressed by aotucratic regimes , their belongings confiscated , their gatherings forbidden, and their mentality rediculed by government controlled media!!
I remember -- and it's one of the reasons I worry for you. Since you're in the Sudan. Again, though - luckily you're a muslim - so if you just keep quiet and don't speak Truth...they won't come after you.....ahem.
Quote:the US government or specifically the CIA was involved in overthrowing a democratically elected government in Sudan ( 1964-1969) this government was formed of what you would call a moderate Islamic party headed by Elsadig Elmahdi who has had his education in oxford and is known and respected in political circles in the west only to put a military government in his place headed by general Numeiry who was actually leaning towards the soviet union in his first two years of rule but became a strong ally of the US after that, this same government was responsible for the torture and death of many opposing parties and people, and helped todays governing party accumilate wealth that enabled them to overthrow another democratic government later on, this political party is responsible for whats happening in Darfor and the murders of many many innocent Sudanese citizens of different political affiliations, thats an example of what US interference did to moderate and democratic Islamic nations.
We supported the apparent "lesser of two evils" at the time - Like you even stated - the guy came off as a decent moderate!! Why is it OUR fault for him practicing taqiyya on us!!! And hey!! I myself have been for DECADES begging people to see what is going on over there and DO SOMETHING!!! But NO ONE in the world cares. America could come in and topple them and give you your country back -- but then you'd just scream at us again!!.....ahem
And where are all the muslim nations!! Turning a blind eye to you - as is the U.N. and the rest of the world....
I know you take this one personally -with good reason - and I hear you, I truly do... But another blunder we made was the CIA supporting the Ayahtolla in deposing the shah of Iran -- and now look what a bloody mess they turned in to! All that we have always done, is tried to support the lesser of two evil - as opposed to imperialistically running it for ourselves. You know what?? It's not OUR fault that people come from disfunctional and sick cultures, and they practice taqiyya on us so we can help them - and then turn to evil acts once they get in power. That's their fault and the culture that bread them.
Quote:thats exactly what am saying , we did contribute during the golden age by picking up from where other nations stoped, and then others( modern day europe) continued .
Fair enough. I've just heard some say that it was ALL due to islam -- never mentioning picking up the pieces, as though islam discovered everything.
Quote:as i said Islam now is in a very sorry state , am not at all surprised at this bit of news, the continuation of dictatorships ruling over us is the main culprit , not only today’s governments but their predecessors and their predecessors.
Agreed!! But the way to freedom isn't more of the same!!! Islam has it's "last chance" in Iraq to build a free nation. based on the muslim version of "We....the people". But with all the sunni vs. shiite killing constantly going on - just to "drive the invaders out" ((as if we never liberated and then left kuwait! **sigh**)) - I can't see islam getting better. It's only sinking lower. Separate mosque and state - and your religious wars against each other (sunni vs. shiite etc.) will stop. Only then will Islam grow up to meet the 21st century.
Quote:let me ask you this, how embarrassing would it be for you if you were to be publicly spanked ( the common punish for kids !! ) , extremely embarrassing i would guess right? plus in sharia law , the cases for which flogging or spanking is the punishment could be counted with one hand , and is mainly used to embarrass the culprit so much so as to not commit the felony again, this is usualy done for minor crimes where sharia law left it for the judge , as in if some one insulted another person publicly its upto the judge to decide the punishment , their is a condition that for flogging ,the sentence ( or number of floggings ) must be less than the established numbers of floggings for crimes in sharia law.
Actually, in the west, if one person insulted another publically, there's a typical childrens playground retort of "sticks and stones will break my bones, but names can never hurt me" -- then we stick out our tonuges and give a big ***PLPLPLPP**** rasberry. lolol ~ God that Honor/Shame foolishness is oh so funny!! lolol. Sharia wouldn't work in the west at all. We've been free too long and don't want to be shackled. If someone insults you -- laugh in their face and toss a (truthful/honest) jibe back at them, and grow on in your life. If you laugh in the insulters face and belittle him as an ignorant child -- the "honor" is there. I don't need sharia and flogging a fool to accomplish that. and I don't even need to kill him! And I'm the better man for that.....
Quote:in regards to cutting the hands of a thief there are a lot of conditions that must be met before that judgment is passed , for instance the value of the stolen goods ( i can recall right now how much but i will get back to you on that) , plus their must be very very strong evidence that removes all shadow of doubt, i mean fingerprints prove where a person has touched, but video tapes show you stealing, John Grisham would call it irrefutable evidence
,
about stoning its regardless of gender ( i mean its not for women only men too) and several factors must be established before stoning they are:-
1- the accused is or was married.
2- the accused was witnessed by 4 people together (i mean all the four should have seen the act of adultery together ).
3- all the four witnesses must state that they actually saw the male organ entering the vagina ( i have to be this clear) , for example if they saw the two just fondling each other even if butt naked it does not amount to stoning.
i also must mention that during the life time of prophet mohamed (pbuh) authenticated hadith proves he allowed only one incidence of stoning the proof was admittance of the act ( which is the only other way ) .
now that you understand the very difficult conditions under which stoning can be made in sharia law, there is another angle to cover, why would islam allow stoning in the first place? isnot it too cruel?
this is how i see it, a person or a couple who allow themselves to indulge in adultery even after being married and quenching a human need(whether biological emotional or physical) in a lawful way and still they want to have practice sex outside marriage then these are seriously in need of psychiatric help , but those who are so unlawful and un-abiding with absolutely no sense of shame to the extent of allowing themselves to be witnessed by four people ( what are the odds of that happening? ) these people are challenging our core values , they don’t give a **** about society, and are totally deprived of decency and common knowledge .
Whew - that's a big one. And while I see some of your points, I still think you are wrong.
Why the slow torture of stoning?? (other than that "the prophet did it") in this day and age, why not a quick bullet into the head, then? Quicker and easier for everyone, yes? But, actually, isn't it enough that the spouse that was cheated on divorces and casts her (or him) out, and there is a shunnning in the society, in the hopes that the person repents and grows up?? Christianity gives them that chance to repent (which we all are capable of) -- you all just kill them.....
There once was a woman in Judea -- 650 years before your prophet was born, who was caught in adultery - caught in the act!!.... She was dragged out by the crowd/people and rabbis to be stoned.....
A prophet (at least YOU said he was a prophet) said: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone..." And one by one the people turned and left....
After they all left and the woman thanked Jesus, He told her to "Go, and sin no more".
You know what, my brother?? That woman went and sinned no more. How do I know this?? Because she isn't mentioned by name in scripture. You see, the one true God would not want to libel a person who's soul had changed.....
You, my brother, would never have given her that chance.
Such is the difference between Judeao-Christain values and Islam.
Quote:must keep in your mind that the practice of sex outside marriage is the source of all evil to society, in other words high rates of crime, murder and rapes are mostly caused by outcasts of society , in the muslim world children born out of wedlock constitute 90% of societies outcasts , the results of wide spread practice of adultery will be the direct cause of a fall of the western world if its not controlled soon.
i dont want my society to suffer from this.
Oh, Bro -- while I agree that a family, comprised of a father, a mother and children ARE the bedrock of society, I don't agree that sex outside of marriage is the source of all evil to a society.
What's funny/sad is you don't see the correlation in your statement of bastard children (HUMAN BEINGS!! ~ WHo are INNOCENT!! It wasn't THEIR fault their parent chose to "sin"! Why do you "outcast" the human child, for their fathers/mothers sin??? ~ Another differnce between judeao-Christian values and Islam) being 90% of OUTCASTS in your society.... If they are "Outcasts" ~ what options do they have except crime??? So it's YOUR "outcast" mentality that causes them to HAVE to commit crimes to LIVE......Sad.
Maybe if children born out of wedlock (it wasn't THEIR fault, after all...) were HELPED in your society, they wouldn't commit the crimes you attribute to them. PLUS, I would have to say your numbers are surely inflated - Crimes are committed by people of all walks of life, all castes, all levels in society -- because it is individuals who make choices to commit a crime or not. Anywhere therre is humanity, there will be people even "well off" and from "good families" who choose to commit crimes. Now, certainly, an unmarried woman with a child has a hard time to excell - and often ends in poverty - and within poverty is generally more crime (though why were crime rates lower during the world's Great Depression than they are now?? Because even without money, people still lived values/morals.)
In one sense, you ARE right! I mean, a person who is so "loose" and immoral as to mess around and have a child outside of marriage is also the type who couldn't/wouldn't raise that child properly, to be a good, productive human.
But, there are plenty of good people who have made mistakes (and gotten pregnant) - and DEFINITELY learned and grew up from those mistakes, and they've raised wonderful, good, productive chidren. And Sharia would have killed them before they got that chance.
I don't belive it's "adultery" that will cause the fall of the west - I believe it's the left/liberal/"progressive" perspective that seeks to destroy the family and marriage itself that will destroy the foundation (family/marriage) of western culture. Similar concepts - but different, really. And trust me - many here are fighting that -- but we won't KILL people over it. It HAS to be by reason and logic and dialogue....not by the sword.
Quote:The islamic madrassas you are referring to here we go to them ( in my country) before the age of entering first grade in school, the islamic madrassas for all ages teach all modern science like mathematics and physics, and they concentrate on Islamic studies a bit more than regular government schools, we dont think it is enough for a person to only learn the Quraan and nothing else , and please allow me to say that it would be stupid of you to assume that the majority of Muslims believe that either.
Of course not! There's the Hadiths to learn, too! ;-) ~ Sorry - couldn't resist. :-)
Ok then -- great -- then refer back to my previous post listing the accomplishments of Islam vs. Judaism, as well as the fact that Mexico (Mexico!) translates more books in a year than the entire muslim world combined??? Proof is in the pudding..... Or, you can tell a man by his fruits.
What are the fruits of islam, for all this math and physics you say is being taught?? No offense, but there's many muslims who are only using that knowledge to build a better IED..... How about if we build a better world for ALL instead?? Like the Jews have been doing.....
Quote:
((this in reply to my requesting he visit the website links to see scripture extremists use))
i wanted you to state some so i can point out the way those verses should have been understood , the obvious way , the way it has been said.
I've seen the different interpretations - I know your answers - I also know it is just as "obvious" for the extremist's interpretations-- which is why MILLIONS see what the extremists see and follow it.
The biggest difference between Judeao-Christain heritage and Islam is that, while we see events of the scripture in light of the "way of the world" and necessary for those times only, Islamists (not to be confused with good people/muslims like you) see that your prophet did it - and they want to emulate those (what we would consider in this day and age) atrocities.
I KNOW what you say your scripture should mean....please, for the love of God, tell the extremists what they mean.....
Quote:
((in response to comment of Barbary pirates))
thanks for the info, these guys u mention , they are nothing but typical pirates , whom on which the rule of the marine world should have been applied to.
Cool -- Yeah it is an interesting tidbit of hstory. Here's the Wikipedia (which is more P.C./lefty than I like) description of them::
Barbary pirate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Umm-- as you can read -- it was a lot more than a few pirate renegades...they were actually an extension of the Ottoman empire, my friend. It went on for hundreds of years and was pretty much sanctioned and part of the muslims world towards the west....
This, along with the pope's referrence to a
17th century debate between an Muslim and a Christian in which it was stated that the only thing Islam has brought new to the world was the sword, instead of reason, (which --ummmm--- sparked the usual riots by ignorant peoples who refuse to see the truth....) prove that this alleged "extremist" perspective you sincerely belive to be wrong...is endemic to Islam itself and has been ongoing since it's inception.....perpetual war against those that don't belive in Islam and the words of your prophet.
Quote:i can reply and say i will believe that America will allow a Muslim to be its president when i see it, but i understand that the law's allow it, but the law's also state its the people that choose, if a candidate can win their hearts and minds then he can be a president regardless of all else.
Amen! ~ And since the majority of people abhor the tenets of sharia, and they couldn't trust a muslim president, it will be a long time before one could be president here. Say, AFTER the reformation that is soooo sorely need in the muslim world.
Still, the point was that a muslim WAS elected to public office here in America -- I never said anything about the president - but you just had to enlarge it try to "show" America's "bigotry" -(note the quotes) - One makes it to public office, but you have to say one could never be president. MY point was that in a muslim society, someone of a different religion COULDN"T BE ANYTHING!! So which society offers more to ALL people??? The west, of course.....
Quote:regarding non-Muslims taking part in government am not sure about that too , but i think that its a necessity at least in my country ( where we have minorities of other religions) they should have representatives in office, but i would still prefer the head of state to be a Muslim.(on the condition that minorities can live according to their own religious laws with consideration of feelings to the Muslim majority)
But they DON'T have representation in office!! That's the point! ~ and in one paragraph, you knock America, stating you'd beleive a muslim could be president when you see it, stating that, well - yeah, by the LAW one could - but those people!! insinuating they would never allow it.....and then in the next paragraph you boldly proclaim that you prefer a Muslim as the head of your nation!! puhhleease!!! lol -- allow us the same mode of thought as yourself!! lolol ;-)
The TRUTH remains: Here, a muslim was elected to public office -- in a Muslim nation, the reverse of that could NEVER be.
We see...my friend....the west sees your "truth".....
Quote:
((need to read my last post - too long to reproduce: basically, I stated the Islamists, per Islam, divide the world in to Darul Islam and Darul Harb -- The "house of Islam<submission>" and the "house of war" - so islamists see theirselves at perpetual war outside of islamic nations. It's THEIR own words -- not mine)))
sorry that’s news to me, i think Islam orders me not to attack those who do not attack me, have peaceful co-existence as the base for relationships with others, and apply the three choices to those am at war with.
Great. And I do believe you. Maybe between you and I, we can convince the rest of the Muslim world about that, too.
Quote:
((the choices are, per the quran, for the people of the book (Jews and Christians) and they are: Convert, pay the tax and be second class citizens (actually worse than the old "Jim Crow" stuff), or die/be killed -- but there is no cumpulsion in religion, mind you...***chuckle***))
those choices are applied to those with whom we are at war, regardless of religion, that’s my understanding and the oppressed majority (the common man or woman).
Well, all the ex-muslims I've spoken with tell me different. Check out those two sites I mentioned. The choices really do appear to be only for "the people of the book" -- and all others can be killed outright. You can (should) go debate them about it. Since they're ex-muslims, they certainly know more than me. Of course, they have to watch themselves -since they are considered apostates and leaving Islam is punishable by death.....not that there is any "cumpulsion" there, mind you. ;-)
Quote:COMBONI is one of the oldest Christian establishments in Sudan , they have built churches in many areas ( actually not so far from my own home) , they have schools, they have colleges , they have hospitals ( i have been treated in one of them several times ) and in my country its not punishable by death, which means Islam does not teach it, Christians in Sudan are known to own the best real estate in the capital, its like this is their business, i have and had many Christian friends, many of them discussed Christianity with me without fear and they did not think they had to fear anything, some countries may consider it a capital crime but its allowed to preach Christianity in personal levels like in a church or if you establish clubs and the sorts, but surely not on TV or radio it would not be allowed anywhere in the Islamic world.
Soooo cool to hear. Then there is some hope for Sudan. <<unless this is taqiyya>> So, what's up with Darfur and the christian and black muslim genocide going on???
Though it is kind of telling that, while it might be allowed on a "personel" one-on-one level (which is all Christ needs) they cannot broadcast their beliefs equally in the public forum....very telling. I believe if the opposite were true, (say, if in America muslims were not allowed the public forum they ARE afforded) there would be muslims screaming bigotry, racism and calling for Jihad. That's the word they would use!! I know - you and I wish to change the description to Haribah... anyhow....
Quote:absolutely wrong , i can not and will not break a treaty of peace unless you willfully and intentionally break it first and all hope of returning to it has been exhausted , you say prophet mohamed (pbuh) did it i say he did not, the website you mentioned is blocked from here i can not access it so just copy and paste the hadiths or verses or whatever they base their accusations upon.
Good to hear YOU wouldn't. On mohammed breaking the treaty, that would be the treaty he had with the Jews in the region. I forget the name, but I think it started with a Q. ((I could look it up, but I'm tired, and I'm sure you remember to which I am refering to now) Certainly, the islamic histroy is that the Jews broke the treaty and plotted to kill mohamed, but the western history is that it was mohamed who concocted that story of treason, and purposely broke the treaty once he built up his arms. Maybe the truth is somwhere in the middle? since mo
was JUST a man, and ALL sides write history from their own perspectives. The truth is generally somewhere in the middle.....
Hey, Bro ~ I am SOoooo sorry those sites (and I'm sure many more) are blocked from you. There is Soooo much out there in the world you are missing!! God, I wish you lived in America where you could be truly free!!
I'm totally serious there....I think you would be an asset to what America is about.....
Quote:there is no compulsion to enter into the religion , regarding the death of those who renounce it that’s my understanding of what sharia law's teach , but i need more info on that, i will get back to you on that.
That's what I've read - anyone renouncing islam is an apostate and should be killed - and allegedly it was an edict from mohammed himself.
Quote:exactly the first one you met , there are many you have not met , who do not have access to the internet , and do not know how to converse in English fluently enough to discuss these matters , they are here alright.
That's good to know. Truly.
Quote:if by reform you mean correcting the misunderstandings of many Muslims of what the Quraan teaches , am with you 100% .
Then we are soooo in agreement here!!!
Quote:they would not give you enough time to imagine anything.
Too true...
Quote:I am against them , and against their deeds in darfor and the south too , this government should go, i hope they stick to the peace treaty signed last year that will make elections a possibility.
Me too - and I'll pray for that. And for your safety.
Quote:any one who would kill me inspite of my saying the Shahadatan is not a fellow Muslim of mine
Yeah, I'd be pretty pissed at them, too, if they killed you. You seem a very good Man. Serious! :-) Which is why people like me are generally willing to come over and help remove the governments you so dislike -- if you'd let us.... But then agian, the betrayal of Iraqi's in the first gulf war makes that a hollow hope -- to my shame.....Still, I have a dream.....
Quote:you seem to know about Islam more than me loools , there is nothing as Taqiya in my understanding at least, actually this word means a cap in Arabic , lying is allowed only during warfare ( bombs flying around) against the enemy as a means of deception, and to bring two friends back together , or husband and wife back together.
Yes, for you ~ For islamists, since there is "Darul Harb" (house of war) they believe it means just in general, since they are in perpetual war....
Quote:those you refer to as co-religionist are not in fact what you call them( in my opinion) , they shame the name of Islam, and I totally deny any ties to them.
way cool -- we both feel some shame for the actions of our brethren.....
Hey, Politically-Wrong, ((wish I could call you, in respect/friendship by your real name)) This has been a very neat dialogue.
There IS hope for humanity......
Take care, God bless, guide and watch over you there.
You're in my prayers.
((and lastly......gaa..., my brother/friend....many of the things I've stated may have been a bit melodramatic and "offensive" - on the personal level, I apologize if they bothered you, though I hope they got you thinking.....but I still do stand by my statements! ~ I just hope you take them in stride and openings for the real dialogue you and I have been having... Maybe that can help other people who disagree to dialgoue in reason and decency. And I do hope you take it to heart <and think about it> that what I have said here, between you and I, HAS been worse than the cartoons, the pope's statement, and VanGogh's movie, combined. You and I have still talked rationally -- does that not tell you something?? Mazel Tov....)))