@failures art,
failures art wrote:
Don't worry Wandel, you aren't bugging me. Your posts are some of my favorite. I guess I view that process as simply being more internal to science itself wandel. Philosophy is good, but I lack the patience for endless philosophizing in armchairs.
What I'm annoyed by is the endless arguments on certainty. It is Loki's wager. Discussions go nowhere and false stalemates are forged. Forget good ideas and bad ideas, we can philosophize anything to mean just about anything. We can neutralize the exceptional ideas, and elevate the mediocre ones.
For your amusement.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8[/youtube]
A
R
T
This post makes me know you could use a good dose of philosophy... Certainty has no place in philosophy, but certainty is a staple of religion helping to hold it all together... I would say, if we can say we know this fact, whether we can in fact know it, then where does that fact take the mind, -is the question philosophy asks...
And; there are no good or bad ideas... Any idea must truthfully and accurately represent a certain portion of reality... The idea circle must tell truth about the real circle... The idea of a dog must faithfully represent what can be known of the real dog... Where is the good or bad of that???
Here is what you mean, in my opinion... When people go about building their social forms, like government, and like economies, they do so on the basis of a certain idea in regard to human behavior, and often upon many such ideas regarding human behavior, and if those Ideas are false, then the social form built out of them will be flawed.... So What???
People build forms which are all forms of relationship based upon the level of knowledge, the ideas they have at the time... Indians had homes without chimneys because of a certain want of understanding, or a false idea of the matter... Should they have went without shelter because they did not understand how to build chimneys??? It is better to build with the knowledge one has than to not do so on the basis of future knowledge one has not...
So in building our social forms the mistake is not in our ideas, but in the thought that our ideas of today will serve another generation as well as this... Ideas are not the problem, but the problem is a fact of human nature that philosophy could help to render harmless, by showing that forms meant to sustain a whole people can be robbed of their value and meaning, and that forms change, and that in the changing of forms humanity has always advanced...
There are good ideas, as you call them, waiting to be picked up by humanity and used, but people must first abandon the old, and pick up the new, and in such change is the most salient fact of human nature, that we fear change, and yet must change to survive... Jefferson says as much in the declaration of independence... It is not rocket science, but it is philosophy...