@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:And, by the USSC's ignorance (and yours) of the science of risk analyses and genetics,
they seem to want to extend Judicial pOwers beyond anything provided in the Constitution.
The Constitution does
NOT charge them with any duty to know "risk analyses and genetics",
but it coud n shoud rein in a lower court that rongfully exercised jd in some case;
apparently, that happened in this case, or so I surmise from your posts.
The USSC's is
NOT acting by
MY ignorance of
ANYTHING,
including the science of risk analyses and genetics.
The Court did
NOT consult
ME.
farmerman wrote:The USSC could, by not hearing the case, gone as far as they should have.
NOT if it was merely
CORRECTING and
UNDOING what a lower court had done,
without authority to do so.
farmerman wrote:Where does their power end? Its getting a bit scary living here with this activist court
If the lower court shoud have done nothing, then the USSC was correct to undo what it did n give
the lower court a good rap on the knuckles for usurpation (regardless of safety).
David