0
   

US SUPREME COURT NOW IN THE FOOD BUSINESS

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jun, 2010 10:34 pm

In order for the USSC to be in the food business, it woud have to be selling food.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jun, 2010 10:39 pm
@farmerman,
David wrote:
I 'm no hypocrit. When I have wanted to disagree with the USSC, I have done, explaining how n Y.
farmerman wrote:
I keep forgetting, you are a one issue only person.
Slinging insults does not support your position.
My being obsessed with one issue does not prevent me from taking cognizance of others also.





David
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2010 05:22 am
@Butrflynet,
Sounds like USSC exceeded its conscience in making this decision. Sometimes the most good is served by just shutting up and letting an event take a course.

Alfalfa is already one expensive seed. Im sure that Monsanto is only looking at selling thwir **** to the Western Alfalfa growers who use irrigation for their crops. If this **** is the cause of environmental or health problems, remember the USSC and its bevy of activist douche bags.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2010 05:24 am
@Butrflynet,
Quote:
As a remedy, the district court enjoined APHIS from partially deregulating RRA, and it prohibited virtually all planting of RRA pending a new EIS.

A practical and reasonable approach, why did USSC **** with this?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2010 05:39 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
As a remedy, the district court enjoined APHIS from partially deregulating RRA, and it prohibited virtually all planting of RRA pending a new EIS.

A practical and reasonable approach, why did USSC **** with this?
Because what the USSC is supposed to do
is assure that the legal mechanism is functioning correctly,
not that it be practical nor reasonable.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jun, 2010 09:31 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Slinging insults does not support your position.
My being obsessed with one issue does not prevent me from taking cognizance of others also.
Yes , but unless the lower court were trying to ban the use of guns in farm fields , you wouldnt invest any time or effort in the case.
When Im being insulting you will be the first to know Dave. I need you to getr a pulse and a pwersonal commitment and tell me why the court is doing its job. Also, try not to speak only in silly one-line bumper stickers K? Otherwise Ill just forget about you as a correspondent in the future.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/21/2019 at 01:57:14