@msolga,
I guess you're working, or busy at this minute, hinge.
I was just thinking, watching that, what a shame (for the voters) that our political leaders, during the actual campaign, were not able to have their policies scrutinized in the same way by the press gallery as happened here. I would have liked to have seen Abbott, Gillard & yes, Bob Brown, too ... up there & responding to very much the same questions these 4 were addressing. The "debates" were superficial to the extreme, ... farcical, by contrast.
I think voters might have had a far better understanding of the "mining tax" & the implications for taxation & tax reform if we'd had access to real discussion like this. Same on the respective party positions (or lack of) on carbon emissions, asylum seekers, etc, etc, ...
It was extremely frustrating, watching the discussion of these issues & others
after the election was over, in this forum, rather than
during the campaign itself, with the actual leaders. No wonder they got away with mindless jargon like "no big tax" & "moving ahead" rather than supplying the electorate with real information on their respective positions ...
I think (as a potential bloc which might well decide which party governs the country) I can see real differences between Katter & Oakshott. Katter wants to have it both ways: parochial local hero answering
only to his own constituents & getting the best deal for them, while, at the same time committed to "the good of the nation". Totally contradictory positions. He is too much of a self interested wild card, I'd suspect, to have the discipline to commit to a " bloc party line", even if he says he will. Bandt (Greens) is in a different position altogether, obviously, not being an independent. His agenda is clear cut & tied to the Greens' policies. I'm glad he made the rather obvious point that the Greens won a huge endorsement of their policy,
nation-wide ..... as opposed to the
local endorsement by voters of the other 3.