@dadpad,
My 2 bob's worth:
I agree with you that it was a lacklustre affair, dp. Though I thought Julia Gillard
performed much better than Tony Abbott. I'm still not crazy over Labor's policies, though she was definitely more
convincing in selling them than Abbott was in selling the Libs' policies. Abbott improved over the hour as he relaxed considerably. His starting address was quite stilted.
Interestingly, dapad, the Age saw the "gender appeal" of the two exactly the other way around to you:
Quote:Ms Gillard clearly performed better among women, while Opposition Leader Tony Abbott performed better among men.
.... Ms Gillard sent the men's graph tumbling when she turned negative, while Mr Abbott appeared to offend women during his sledging of the government's policies.
If the Nine Network's debate worms were any guide to his election chances, Mr Abbott better get a wriggle on, especially with women.
But Ms Gillard has work to do on climate change and her move against former Labor leader Kevin Rudd.
Nine's worms put Ms Gillard well ahead of Mr Abbott in the final analysis of Sunday night's leaders' debate, with 63 per cent to 37. ...
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-election/gillard-wins-in-tight-debate-20100725-10qfv.html?rand=1280052711324
I watched the debate on the ABC (minus worms, or any other such observer feedback indicators) & I'm rather surprised at the notion that Abbott somehow offended women, especially after his maternal leave, pitch. This "gender" preference thing is quire interesting, isn't it?
I thought Abbott did a fairly straight rundown on the Libs' policies & was rather gobsmacked, actually, with what Julia got away with in her education & asylum seeker pitches (the two policy areas that I know most about). Neither area has exactly been a success for Labor. Well, not in my book, anyway.
Did either of them even mention climate change? I'm not sure. If they did, their statements made little impact.
Interestingly, the ABC broadcast feedback from an "on the spot" reporter at a social club in western Sydney (where Labor is apparently in a bit of strife with its "traditional" support base). Of the 6 people approached, 4 went with the Abbott & only 2 thought Gillard did a better job. Very strange.
Anyway, my assessment would be something like: 54 Labor/46 Libs. But purely on the basis of salesmanship. Julia was simply a better communicator than Abbott was.