@Dutchy,
I guess it depends on what you mean by "listening to the people", Danny.
We have been talking about reducing carbon pollution for around 20 years now.
And until very recently (the last election) both sides of politics & also the Australian voters
agreed that we needed to take action:
Quote:In the election year of 2007, both the Liberal-led Coalition government and the Labor opposition promised to introduce carbon trading. Opposition leader Rudd commissioned the Garnaut Climate Change Review on 30 April 2007, while Prime Minister John Howard announced his own plan for a carbon trading scheme on 4 June 2007,[3][4] after the final report of the Prime Ministerial Task Group on Emissions Trading. Labor won the election on 24 November.
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_Pollution_Reduction_Scheme
Following that election (& the previous Labor government putting it's existing policy on hold... & also the narrow defeat of Malcolm Turnbull as Liberal leader by Tony Abbott) things got considerably messier.
Yes, Julia Gillard
changed her mind after forming a minority government with the support of the Greens & independents ....
As apparently Tony Abbott would have,too, if you believe Tony Windsor's account of his discussions with Abbott prior to choosing to support Labor over the LNP:
Quote:Mr Windsor, who was instrumental in getting the Government's ETS through parliament, said he had discussed climate change with Mr Abbott during talks on forming minority government after last August's election.
Mr Windsor said he got the impression the Coalition leader would have supported a carbon price if the policy was put to him during these talks.
"He actually begged for the job... (he said) 'I will do anything to get this job'," Mr Windsor said.
But Mr Abbott told reporters that at no stage did he offer to back an ETS.
Turnbull backs 'efficient' emissions trading:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-02-28/turnbull-backs-efficient-emissions-trading/1961170
So I guess if you believe Windsor's account (I do), then we might be calling Tony Abbott a "liar" now & not Julia Gillard?
But more important, I think, is the change in the public's attitude toward government action to reduce carbon pollution.
What has cause
that to occur?
I think the relentless, negative "big new tax" campaign by Abbott & co ... with the strong support of the mainstream (especially the Murdoch) media.
So what is Abbott suggesting should be done instead? Well that's not exactly clear, apart from planting lots & lots of trees!
Also almost Abbott's entire focus has been a scare campaign based on costs to voters.
And he certainly has had success with that!
The way I see things, I'm glad that after 20 years of talk we have
finally taken action. Like quite a number of other countries have, too.
Whether Labor's legislation is the best of the options available, I'm not certain ... but I am prepared, at least, give it a go & see what happens.
We will just have to see if the sky falls in or not!