@Fido,
Fido;158217 wrote:Upon such rubish all metapysical philosophy stands... You tell me your feelings and I will tell you mine... Life is not a cycle of life and death... Life is a continuous chain of life, and that chain is unboken in all life back to the first primitive strand of dna...When you die you die, goodbye...If your forms of relationship work, and you are fit, you will leave a link of the chain of life behind when you die... That is the hope you get...
Let me tell you what your are trying to say about worlds... We all live in forms of relationship... Every form is a structure, and every relationship has a structure, and it is through these forms of relationship which are often multiple and overlapping that we survive, and all of human progress involves changes of forms of relationship, as when people get divorced, or revolt, or as, when the cave man moved from a cave to a tent... And we have our false forms too, that we often share, like religion, or spirituality that do us about as much good as harm, but, the relationship keeps the old form alive even when it does no one any actual good...Some forms are a feel good machine...You tickle it, and you laugh... And all of your insights are illusions, but life is full of them, and what it takes to weed out the illusions from the true vision is real philosophy, logic where it is needed, and sense when it will help...
But, hang on, and some one will straighten you out, or get you off the acid...
Your idea is very logical. Yes, we do connect with people in life, forming relationships, if we are successful and we are fit, we can pass our DNA on down the line leaving behind something from our physical body in another human, and something physical of us will remain present after we die. This biological view on life is correct, in the context of the physical world. Although we don't live just in one world. You have an internal world (mental state of being), cultural worlds and worlds that are not visible to the human eye. This popular idea that procreating is essential to a mans life, especially now days, is without good cause. A question that regards the physical world; Why over-populate a planet, and why create life in a
physical world, if that world is suffering? Our race does not even help the physical quality of the planet Earth. If our race doesn't benefit the planet that essentially housed and gave birth to us, then in this exact moment in the cycle of our civilization, how can we say it is important to have children?[INDENT]Current projections show a steady decline in the growth rate,
and a population of around
9 billion by the year 2050.
The scientific consensus is that the current population
expansion and accompanying
increase in usage of resources
is linked to
threats to the ecosystem.
(
wikipedia)
[/INDENT]This brings me to my other point to think about: If the existence of mankind in the physical world serves no beneficial purpose to, in my opinion
the most important thing in the physical & biological realm - planet Earth - then the concept of life is challenged drastically.
The topic has gone off course a little bit, nevertheless, your comments are appreciated.