@Quinn phil,
Leonard;117518 wrote: The old fashioned hell as a physical place rather than a state of mind is a strange one, to say the least.
State of mind does effect how we regard our physical state, don't you think? A confused state of mind would have a hard time understanding his physical being and what is heaven/good/right and what is hell/bad/wrong. Regarding them as remote destinations makes it difficult to associate either to our physical existence and until we do, our physical being remains in limbo (a place between) or purgatory.
Leonard;117518 wrote: People assume walking on hot coals and being jabbed with burning spears when thinking of hell, as it is written.
Those are just extreme, physical manifestations of one's ability to deal with pain; and yes pain is a form of hell but the mental manifestations do far more damage to our physical being and how we perceive what the senses are allowing us to feel. Some can mentally shut those feelings down and by doing that lose all sense of better and just learn to deal with the pain.
Inflicting pain on ones self is nothing new. Just don't do it to others. People hurt themselves far more than they do others and the hell of it is, they don't know they are doing it. They do that because there is no heaven they can conceive in the physical reality they find themselves in. So what the hell, either endure it or make the most of it creating a paradox and stuck in limbo.
Leonard;117518 wrote: If one claims that those who believe and have been good will go to heaven, couldn't someone also say that one who believes in/fears hell and has been worthy of it will go to hell?
"Good" is such a relative term it is indeed difficult to define what good is. How can fearing something make one worthy of it? Perhaps there is some truth to the more we fear the more likely that we fear will do us harm. I don't think worthy has anything to do with it. I think we can find better answers in trying to eliminate that which makes us afraid. We just need to be in agreement as to what "that" is.
Leonard;117518 wrote: Maybe god invented hell for philosophers to enjoy, while everyone in heaven is blissfully unaware.
Ha, outstanding statement. I don't think god created it, I think hell is man's own creation and it is those who have done the most damage are the philosophers in an effort to undo what they did prior to their being so philosophical. Of course you have to believe in your eternal presence to understand that. And I do.
To step aside just a moment when we think of pain, I think it fair to say the word is associated with physical pain more than mental anguish; yet that is definitely...................a pain. When my body is in a painful state not due to external reason that can be noted, I regard the body as "making adjustments", like remodeling a house. When we make the old new again there is a lot of banging and noise going on to fix up that which is worn out or eroded. Of course that can be applied in many contexts, but if you are able to associate it that way, it relieves any mental worry that pain might cause and much easier to endure and subsequently the body heals. Mind over matter. "Do your work, I don't mind..................bang away, ha!
Like a high fever. Something is wrong and the body is "working like hell" to fix it to the point of shutting it down (coma) to do so. That can also be applied to "mental states" as well as those who become mentally detached from this reality such a stoicism is often referred as. Philosophers were not popular people and live in seclusion for the most part. There minds worked feverishly to fix man's problems. Of course there is that selfish nature that can be understood as they were only trying to validate their own lot in life to relieve guilt and that is not philosophy but could be conceive as such.
In other words those who some consider philosophers.....................are not, just smart asses who think they know it all. Some here are of that nature and feel no one knows more than they and they might consider me that. For those, just let me say this; there is a hell of a lot that I don't know; but what I do know, I effort to find out why I know it and what good that can offer and why they think as they do and the rationalizations that sustain them.
To do that one has to experience both sides of the equation the good and the bad (the heaven and the hell of it), and in doing that one will find a balance and in offering it to others will prevent them from having to experience both sides and not have to rationalize so god damned much.
So Quinn, yes there is an efficiency to hell in that respect if we can indeed learn from it. Unfortunately most, sadly, become accustom to it.
William