@Fil Albuquerque,
I was not asking about an infinite cycle of mass and energy, I was asking how you could traverse an infinite amount of time.
Basically, time itself is finite. We can measure it, days, years, decades, etc. We can measure it because time is finite. The timeline however is what we're debating. But you cannot have an infinite amount of a finite thing. Infinite is a theoretical concept in the finite world.
Walking an infinite distance before coming to a lake is a logical impossibility, isn't it? It's like saying infinite+1, you'll never get to that 1 because you have infinite before it, correct?
And has the General Theory of Relativity been proven wrong? Because that theory - if true - shows the universe to have a beginning, from nothing to everything. So it is necessary for it to be false for an infinite cycle.
To answer your second point, no, I don't. I am in fact a college student, an undergrad at that. But none of this answered any of my questions.
Perhaps my questions weren't clear enough.
I was asking how it is possible to get from infinitely long ago to today. I understand it to be impossible from... well any standpoint I have tried so far.
I also asked about the validity of the General Theory of Relativity. does your argument refute the assertion inherent in the GTR that the universe had a beginning(from nothing to everything)? I understand the GTR to have been proven accurate to nine decimal places and have not heard of anything overturning it.
And finally I asked if giving entropy an infinite amount of time makes it something other than entropy.
As for your third statement, I understand what you mean, but it could easily be misunderstood as arrogance.
