@HeroicOvenmitt,
HeroicOvenmitt wrote:
Okay, I'll rephrase.
If the Law of Causality is not Law, WHY is the universe at all?
Easy -- because it was not caused.
Look,
HO, this is really very simple. "Effect" is defined so that for every effect there is a cause. We can frame it as a simple syllogism:
All effects have causes.
This is an effect.
Therefore, it has a cause.
But that's only true
deductively. It is, therefore, just as true as the following:
All unicorns are white.
This is a unicorn.
Therefore, it is white.
You wouldn't say that unicorns exist in the real world because of the second syllogism, yet for some unknown reason you contend that all effects have causes in the real world because of the first syllogism. We can, however, change the terms of that syllogism quite easily:
Some effects have causes.
This is an effect.
Therefore, it may or may not have a cause.
There is nothing preventing us from adopting the revised syllogism over the original, since they're both equally valid. It's only because the
definition of effect includes the requirement of a cause that you insist that every effect has a cause. But the definition just determines how
words work, not how the
world works.