Those indications of the strength of the respective parties' support are really interesting. Pew
provides a neat table with comparative data from previous elections.
I was just wondering, this afternoon when I was outside, when the last time was that a Presidential election was both this close and this passionate. Two camps of equal size, both infused with the sense that here are elections more important than any in years. Of course, one might say, there were the last elections, in 2000. But just remember the thousands of students who'd gather in spirited enthusiasm at Nader rallies, cheering at the alternative to what seemed like an irrelevant race ... Dont see that anymore.
So when
was the last time the two camps were this galvanised in a race this close? I was thinking 1960. The Pew table shows me wrong. Not even 1960 measured up.
Consider this. GWB is "strongly" supported by 39% of likely voters, even as he doesn't get more than 48% in total. That sets him aside from any previous presidential candidate in the past 44 years. Yes, Reagan was strongly supported by 39% as well, in '84 - but that was on a grand total of 57%. The 39% merely indicated how sweeping the landslide was, not the
intensity of his camp's feeling - after all, another 18% supported him weakly. Same with Nixon in '72 and Johnson in '64. 41% and 42% supported them strongly, respectively, but that was just 2/3s of their total support, which came up to 61% and 64%. With Bush, 4/5ths of his supporters is fanatic about it. No precedent for that.
Kerry's numbers meanwhile (32% strong and 13% soft support makes for a total of 45%), may be "more typical of recent presidential candidates" as Pew notes - but not Democratic ones. Not a single Democratic presidential candidate since LBJ was strongly supported by as many likely voters as Kerry now is - not election victors Clinton and Carter either. Yet it still doesn't get him a plurality. It merely indicates that 5/7ths of Democratic supporters feel "strongly" about their choice - and that, too, is unprecedented.
1960, when 3/4s of those leaning to Nixon and 2/3s of those leaning to JFK supported their candidate strongly and both candidates were locked in a 1% margin-race, is indeed the closest to this race in the table. But even then the camps were not as fired up as they are in this year's dead heat.