god is beyond logic.

Go read Frege's On Sense and Reference and On Concept and Object Wittgenstein's Tractatus and then Ayer's Language Truth and Logic. I think you will have a solid grasp of what is going on. For good measure (and a slightly different perspecitve) you might read the works of Joseph Campbell.

Joseph Campbell: God is a metaphor for that which trancends all levels of intellectual thought. It's as simple as that.

If you read the Tractatus here you migh find something of use.

Logic is simply an internally consistent system, maybe God is logical but using a different system.

If God is a metaphor for just being a good person and all that good bible stuff it would be fine. But people actually do believe in a great creator so they must have defined him. Now, if God is actually omnipotent and all that then he isn't bound by humans definition of him. Just because we defined him doesn't mean he is our definition so he can be above logic I think. I mean if he is so powerful then he doesn't need to be held down by human logig and/or definition.

I'm agnostic, just so you all know.

Logic is simply an internally consistent system, maybe God is logical but using a different system.

I would imagine that if God created this universe, it would be, in a sense, a reflection of Himself. That is to say, it's laws (in this case, logic).

How is "logic" part of god` s nature? e.g, it is a law of logic that:

1. p& q => p

How is 1 part of god?

I would think logic is... God's thought process, in a sense. Not that we can ever understand even a fraction of God's thinking, I believe that it's safe to assume that we can understand something of a fraction of it, if that makes sense.
Take for instance, the Biblical account of God. His actions always seem to have some logical reasoning behind them, even though He is still described as totally transcendent.

So, you are saying logic is god` s thoughts? If so, then could god not have other thoughts?( besides logic)

Are you asking me if God can have thoughts that are logical and thoughts that are illogical, or that God can have multiple streams of thought; some logical, some nonsensical and without reason?
As for the first question, I would answer yes, if by 'thinking illogical thoughts', we mean giving mental assent to things that are not logical.
For the second, I would probably object to that, because I don't believe God can contradict Himself. Of course, this contradiction would only apply to half of God's thought (the logical part), so is half of God's thought then in a state of contradiction with the other? Is God even divisible in such a way, where He can have half His thoughts being in a constant state of contradiction with the other, while the other not being at all affected?
Of course, we can't possibly believe God experiences 'thought' as we do with our minds.

You said logic is a thought of god. well, suppose god has more than one thought, then why should logic be prefered over god` s other thoughts. To be even more clear. Let S be the set of all thought from god S= { x, y, z....}, and say x is logic, then why ought x be the one chosen over other thoughts of god.

Logic is simply an internally consistent system, maybe God is logical but using a different system.

Logic has become a misunderstood Dogma in recent decades. it is not a rule it is not a being, it is not a faith, although many people treat it as such, it is not even one thing. It is a method that relies on presuppositions and ends with an assumption. All something needs to be considered logical is an internally constistent and non contradictory argument built from the original presupposition. The presupposition does not have to be disprovable. I could make a logical argument claiming that fish live in the sky if my pressuposition was that the sky is a large body of water that separates masses of land. It is a method, and thus has no value exept for its efficacy of applicability. It far from has any moral value.

Ex. The argument against mysticism: Mysticim is irrational because there is no sustainable empirical prooff blah blah blah.... this is only true given that the logical argument has the presupposition of empirical materialism... only empirically provable things are real. Many things seem illogical because of cultural trends and scientific dogmatism.

The other issue with logic is that it used interchangeably with rationality. They are not the same thing. To be rational is to be practical in a situation. To be logical is to be rational given a certain set of presupposed conditions that can be abstracted. So it is completely rational and logical to step out of the way of a speeding car. But it is not necessarily illogical to believe in an earth mother or aliens etc...

so as the expansion of the previous post you asked to expand on. God probably is logical and ration given the cuircumstances in which s/he exists

This is a circular argument. The only person that can say if a thought is illogical is the person that thought it. In its very essence illogical thought is logical. Go figure.