Question about greek

LOL! Nothing against that response, but dang... that was something. Look... take this "statement" for example...

Buy Kalpo dog food! YUM for the tummy!

Read the next LINE!

Good is bad and bad is good, or we think we should, or it may not.

When I say hilshire, you say farm.

What is a potato...Indeed, Kittie razzle dazzle.

- SPooN

Now if I answered anybody like that... do you think I would loose at least some modicum of credibility??? Probably.

Again, You may actually have a good point to make, and I look forward to reading it, but... dude... seriously. I've seen some stuff in my time, but...wow.

Essay concerning human understanding

LOL! Can one really play with the powers that be?

Not At all on that level..But we did split the ATOM the indivisible entity..

There are lower powers and higher powers an infinite amount of such.

You say it your way I say it my way..thats all...

I do have proof of my understanding....
____________________________________________________________
Who followed and who leads?

Tron is also, in some instances, referred to as "integral." Like an integral (instrumentive) piece of a larger framework or machine. Electron is for all intensive purposes a charge per se (Elec), and the tron may be the suffix which pertains to its status as an integral peice of an atom.

I have to agree with Theatetus' assement as well. Throne is an integral component which can be applied in meaning.
______________________________________________________________

Did you not get the stupid lost kid act by now?

Like a fiddle.....

Questions?
-Marc

First... is the atom an indivisible entity??? Im pretty sure basic chemistry will reveal that this is a very flawed statement. Even Democritus knew that the atom was a divisible aggregate.

That there are lower powers and higher powers... ok. This seems a very basic understanding of entropy.

In regards to Tron. I see a whole bunch of pieced together thoughts by various other posts in regards to "Tron" etymologically, but nothing substantive. Again, I am eager to hear your position on your theory.

As to the stupid lost kid act thing, there doesn't seem to be anything lost about it if there is a theory to posit which pin points it somewhere.

Like an accordion...

So... Answers???

ummm did you miss the split part?

we did split the ATOM the indivisible entity..

Not so indivisible anymore..Read my words my friend....

ummm...LOL! Your are right! An atom can be divided! In your own words, the atom is "no[t] so indivisible anymore." My bad!

Now that the idiosyncrasies are out of the way... I am still eager to hear your position on your theory.

Sometimes a man of knowledge will speak in parables that can only be understood by those who are meant to know the meaning.

Most of the time, an idiot speaks gibberish and believes himself to be some sort of god.

WOW that was absolutely perfection!

-Marc Welcome the the Parables
The Traveler..

I know, it wouldn't have been typed if it were not absolute perfection!

But the singularity is always static, yet it manifests one aspect of its absoluteness at any one moment, a deceiver to all...

Our atomic radiance shines brighter as it turns, always fading to black before exploding in whiteness!

this proves my theorem of the two opposing forces, which can only be known when the spectrum of the fourth vector is in radial mode, and the system is idle...

now I hope you can start beginning to share in my theories of the spectral cloud, theyres is the source of it all!!

Umm Pangloss, can you give me a hand with the above post..Getting a bit tired of explaining myself..

Pectral Cloud? Meaning Genealogy cloud??

I am very interested to your theories of course:)

-Marc

Seriously, I think you do have something very good to say. I still have some amount of faith left that you are trying in some respect to formulate an argument or some sort of position. Descartes himself said, "God made the will infinite and the intellect finite, and this is why we err." I think your will to embrace the outer appearance of a philosopher is there and I think the latter will improve in time.

And I think as time goes on, you will learn more in school and you will develop a more logical train of thought and fill your thoughts out with valid inferences. But these things take time, and I'm sure with more work you can achieve this goal. All I can say is that you should keep trying to reach this respectable goal. You will certainly benefit from it in the future.

This is only natural for people that are just entering the realm of philosophy and I can see where you are coming from. These are very difficult notions to grasp and it is impossible to fully understand even the bases of these notions at such a young age. The superficial meanings of some of these more difficult words hold only a glimpse of their true meaning. But as time progresses, I honestly do believe that you will get better at it.

Philosophy is a hard nut to crack because it requires something beyond common thinking. I think you are genuinely trying.

the experiment provides strong evidence that a quantum event at one location can affect an event at another location without any obvious mechanism for communication between the two locations. This has been called "spooky action at a distance".

I really don't have any "theories" to offer; my own philosophy changes day to day as I acquire more experience and reassess my viewpoints and conclusions.

Science is making interesting progress with real philosophical implications. Many people try to argue that due to science, these more metaphysical ideas in philosophy cannot be true, but they fail to understand science and some of the possibilities left open within physics. Here is one example that is quite interesting:

Bell test experiments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia