Question about greek

Meanings are usually made clearer by context in Greek as in any language; often a word has several meanings or shades of meanings which can only be understood by estimating how they are meant to be understood within a sentence or passage. Thus, there would not be a "true meaning."
Given the sampling of Greek texts, we can only say how a word is used, or we think it is used, in that realm; we have little idea of how the word was used elsewhere (say in slang or ordinary language).

The general consensus on the word tron (usually a suffix in ancient Greek) is that it means "throne." "Ton" on the other hand, is the article used with an accusative cased noun.

I hope that helps. As far as I know--which is rather little considering I have only studied ancient Greek for a few months--the words have nothing to do with energy.

Well you are certainly right in the idea that tron has to do with a higher order or power.

ton = definite article of the accusative case of a noun, not a verb. Consider ton to equal to words like the, his, hers, its, theirs, etc. For example (in English transliteration), ton agron means the tree.

Well you are certainly right in the idea that tron has to do with a higher order or power.

ton = definite article of the accusative case of a noun, not a verb. Consider ton to equal to words like the, his, hers, its, theirs, etc. For example (in English transliteration), ton agron means the tree.

Wonderful that was what I was looking for!

Thank you very much.

-Marc

Had awhile to think about this, here is what conclusions I have come to;



Humzzzz
-Marc

Tron is also, in some instances, referred to as "integral." Like an integral (instrumentive) piece of a larger framework or machine. Electron is for all intensive purposes a charge per se (Elec), and the tron may be the suffix which pertains to its status as an integral peice of an atom.

I have to agree with Theatetus' assement as well. Throne is an integral component which can be applied in meaning.

The assumption that the scientific words are based on tron may not be correct:
"The word electron was coined in 1894 and is derived from the term electric, whose ultimate origin is the Greek word 'ηλεκτρον, meaning amber. Electrostatic charge can be generated by rubbing the amber with the pelt of an animal e.g. a cat and has been done so while analysing elementary charge for the first time. The ending -on, shared by most subatomic particles, was used in analogy to the word ion."
Patent-Invent: Electron

It might be interesting to research the other words with "tron."

In what way is this related to Pythagoras of Samos?

Nothing against what you have to say... far from it. But like any good theory, a detraction usually provides ample opportunity for the theorist to drive home their point. This is a philosophy of science thread after all. You didn't expect that someone would question your theory on a public forum???

All in all, I'm trying to piece together something about your argument, thesis, or theory.

At first glance? it almost looks like you are nailing your theory to a pH scale. But from what I gather, you posit some sort of variation of redox reactions. This is fine, it's a common chemistry theorem. You also introduce matter. Is this "organic" matter? Is this an organic redox theorem? But you introduce "waves" as well. Is this physics as well???

Also, I'm more partial to the phrase, "people will, no matter the facts, believe what they want."