Toughest Philosophical Questions

@Frank Apisa,

I was merely responding to your post,

Quote:

It goes without question that no one can show that there are no gods.

That does not impact on the question of whether gods exist or not...but it is an irrefutable assertion.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Okay, which easter bunny or god are you referring to?

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Quote:

Are you stipulating that "it goes without question that no one can show there is no Easter Bunny?"

I am only trying to follow the logic that you are using.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

The bottom line is that…

… it goes without question that no one can show that there are no gods.

That does not impact on the question of whether gods exist or not...but it is an irrefutable assertion.

That was what I said. If you have a question about the logic of my comment…bring it up for discussion.

No one can show there are no gods.

That does not impact on the question of whether gods exist or not.

But the comment, “No one can show there are no gods” is irrefutable.

1 Reply

@reasoning logic,

The bottom line is that…

… it goes without question that no one can show that there are no gods.

That does not impact on the question of whether gods exist or not...but it is an irrefutable assertion.

That was what I said. If you have a question about the logic of my comment…bring it up for discussion.

No one can show there are no gods.

That does not impact on the question of whether gods exist or not.

But the comment, “No one can show there are no gods” is irrefutable.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

You wrote,

Quote:

But the comment, “No one can show there are no gods” is irrefutable.

How about the tooth fairy?

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

How about the tooth fairy?

No matter how that is answered...it does not effect the comment:

“No one can show there are no gods” is irrefutable.

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Also, “No one can show there are no tooth fairy” is irrefutable.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Quote:

“No one can show there are no gods” is irrefutable.

Yep you are correct and there is no one who can show there are no Easter bunnys but do you think we should hold this to a high degree?

1 Reply

@reasoning logic,

Quote:

Yep you are correct and there is no one who can show there are no Easter bunnys but do you think we should hold this to a high degree?

What do you mean by "hold this to a high degree?"

Personally, I never think about Easter Bunnies, unicorns, tooth fairies, flying spaghetti monsters, or CPA's working on on of the moons of Saturn...

...except when I am having a conversation with an atheist on the Internet.

Atheists on the Internet seem to be obsessed with them. So perhaps you, as an atheist on the Internet, can answer the question you proposed to me better than I can.

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Quote:

What do you mean by "hold this to a high degree?"

Are you willing to give the Easter bunny the same consideration that you have given a God? If not "why not? do you have any more supporting evidence of one than the other?

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

So, you're saying you don't have to believe in those fairy tale characters, because of "degree?"

You've got to be kidding!

1 Reply

@mikeymojo,

u mean to sell lies based on future speculations about existence justifications

mister, when smthg is objectively negative then speculating its positive sense is a lie, positive future sense wise is exclusively to what look constant absolute still same zero at least

and what prove u being a liar is what u invent about people conditions while everyone witness the opposite even if they are not able to say it since never meaning any concern about that point particularly

right people are tortured everywhere and forced to appear slaves to abusive powerful wills by using them as skills for their joy imagining gaining to quit pretending having some obligations to fullfil
while bad people are also slaves in form of their moves to extranatural powers but as subjects are the free ones livings constant as they want to b so as they are

1 Reply

@reasoning logic,

Quote:

Are you willing to give the Easter bunny the same consideration that you have given a God? If not "why not? do you have any more supporting evidence of one than the other?

As I said, Easter Bunnies are only important to Internet Atheists and little kids. If you have questions about Easter Bunnies...ask one of them.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

So, you're saying you don't have to believe in those fairy tale characters, because of "degree?"

You've got to be kidding!

I did not say that anywhere. Is there a reason why you are pretending that I did?

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

So, you changed your post; that's okay - fool yourself in what you want to believe.

You're going to now deny you used that word, "degree?"

Because I would never have even thought of using such a word unless you had written it first.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

So, you changed your post; that's okay - fool yourself in what you want to believe.

I absolutely, positively DID NOT change a word of any post here.

Don't give me any bullshit about that.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Reasoning Logic used those words on me...and I asked him about it.

Check it out.

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

And I will graciously accept your apology if you are man enough to offer it.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

I did, and reasoning logic copied and pasted from your post in quotation marks.

Quote:

@Frank Apisa,
Quote:

What do you mean by "hold this to a high degree?"

2 Replies

Toughest Philosophical Questions

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know