Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:12 pm
@JPLosman0711,
Phenomenology is still important in Being...although you are technically correct in your assumption...
north
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:12 pm
@JPLosman0711,
JPLosman0711 wrote:

So, that which we refer to, is valid through agreement? Couldn't we then technically 'agree' about anything?


what

its not hard to quote posts

otherwise I don't exactly know what you are referring too

JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:14 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Yes, it is important in it's Being, this also has to do with it's historicity.....but what I believe to be of utmost importance is it's willingness to allow what it hears to 'sink in' and have an affect.
0 Replies
 
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:15 pm
@north,
You said "so what" when I said that our definitions only have validity because we all agree about them.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:20 pm
@JPLosman0711,
Our "disagreements" are circumstantial...as we are One...if we were to truly disagree we would n´t even be able to talk about it...the function that I experience today is the function you will experience tomorrow...disagreement is temporary...Truth is Eternal...
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:22 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Yes but these disagreements are necessary to experience what we would call 'agreements'. Truth is eternal, but in order to help define yourself, you need to become what you hear.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:24 pm
@JPLosman0711,
Agreed...but now you are pushing for 3% of the audience... Mr. Green
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:25 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
It doesn't matter, because in reality there are no percentages. Very Happy
north
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:26 pm
@JPLosman0711,
JPLosman0711 wrote:

You said "so what" when I said that our definitions only have validity because we all agree about them.


because inotherwords , our definitions don't change the object

the object is the object , defined by us or not
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:27 pm
@north,
Right, so we an 'call' them whatever we wish - right?
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:29 pm
@JPLosman0711,
You got me there... Embarrassed
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:30 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Very Happy I am you, you are me - let's celebrate!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:32 pm
@north,
From the "Object" we have our circumstantial functional "object", according to the extension (literally) of our need in the asking...
north
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:32 pm
@JPLosman0711,
JPLosman0711 wrote:

Right, so we an 'call' them whatever we wish - right?


yes

to the object itself what we call them makes no difference
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:33 pm
@north,
Why not?
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:34 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Yes, but I believe part of the problem lies in the 'need' to ask.....
north
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:34 pm
@JPLosman0711,
JPLosman0711 wrote:

Why not?


why not ?
0 Replies
 
JPLosman0711
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:35 pm
@north,
Right, so why bother with all these definitions then?
north
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:39 pm
@JPLosman0711,
JPLosman0711 wrote:

Right, so why bother with all these definitions then?


clearity of communication
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Dec, 2010 08:40 pm
@JPLosman0711,
The importance of not knowing brings the importance of asking, of being alive...we are suppose to ask or to have the illusion of not knowing...
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 01:27:39