@Victor Eremita,
Victor Eremita said:
Quote:
Anyone excited? It looks good; but that's hardly an indiciation of success. Plus, I can imagine all the hardcore Trekkies nitpicking this movie to no end, like they did with UPN's Enterprise.
To be honest, I'm not especially looking forward to it for several reasons:
1) Why does Paramount keep trying to go
backwards in the series?
I'm not a hardcore Trekker by any stretch of the imagination, but the UPN version was a joke (in addition to its terrible writing) in that it tried to re-write the ST universe in a new way.
There is a reason the old series worked and the subsequent series, up to the point of
Enterprise worked: they followed a master plan introduced by Roddenburry. The timeline made sense.
Going backwards and writing the history is simply ridiculous.
2) Connected to #1, it seems that Paramount has so little faith in it's writers that it's going back because it's afraid to take a chance on a new concept. All over the Web there are thousands of fans who have written all manner of interesting new senarios that could take place in the ST universe.
This trend of trying to re-make old movies with new technology is quite sad, IMHO. It's cheap in concept. What it says to me is: "We're too stupid or afraid to come up with something new so we're going to try to prop up our old product and just dress it up with a bunch of bells and whistles."
To give an analogy, this would be like Ford bringing back the Model T, only now it's made of high-density plastic and has a built-in Ipod.
I doubt I will see it in the theater.
3) Also relating to #1, I think fans are interested in seeing the NEXT version of ST (eg. after the DS9 and Voyager series). All sorts of interesting characters, technology, and plots were advanced in those.
This old stuff is nothing new. It's a re-animated corpse and deserves to be buried IMHO.