SHUD AMERICA ENACT COMMON SENSE IMMIGRATION LAWS?

Forums: Immigration, Law
Email this Topic • Print this Page

SHUD AMERICA ENACT COMMON SENSE IMMIGRATION LAWS?
Aliens have no right to be in America
and thay have even less right to become American citizens.

Does it make any sense to let more Moslems in here ?
It seems too dangerous to me.

Look at what we get in return for our hospitality:

The New York Times wrote:

The New York Times
Tue, May 04, 2010 -- 12:17 AM ET
-----

U.S. Arrests Connecticut Man in Times Square Bomb Plot

Federal agents and police detectives Monday night arrested a
Connecticut man, a naturalized United States citizen from
Pakistan, in connection with the failed Times Square car
bombing on Saturday night, a person briefed on the
investigation said. [All emfasis has been added by David.]

Some of u may cry out that he has not yet been convicted of bombing,
but bear in mind that A2K is not a court of law
and we can say whatever we wanna.

Read More:
http://www.nytimes.com?emc=na

David

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 869 • Replies: 12

No top replies

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

SHUD AMERICA ENACT COMMON SENSE IMMIGRATION LAWS?

I don't know what "shud" means.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

The very class of our citizens who whip up the hate/fear directed at immigrates are the same class who benefit the most from hiring them as cheap labor.

It funny/sad when you think about it that the lawmakers of the state of Arizona are tasking the police to chase around their own maids/ childcare and pool boys.

I can only hope that some newspaper will look into how many illegals immigrates these people had working for them at any given time.

1 Reply

@BillRM,

BillRM wrote:

The very class of our citizens who whip up the hate/fear directed at immigrates are the same class who benefit the most from hiring them as cheap labor.

It funny/sad when you think about it that the lawmakers of the state of Arizona are tasking the police to chase around their own maids/ childcare and pool boys.

I can only hope that some newspaper will look into how many illegals immigrates these people had working for them at any given time.

MOSLEMS and Mexicans are not the same thing,
tho I 'd be willing to keep out Mexican Moslems.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Too late, you're already in, Om.

0 Replies

And Bill, it's 'immigRANTS' not 'immigrATES'

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

You wish to keep out all the world Muslims as a class?

What are you going to do with the very large black American Muslim population for example?

In any case do not be silly we have more then enough of our home growth nuts to think that we would be safer by banning all Muslims not to mention the world reaction to that kind of bone headed move.

And last but not least there is a little thing call the constitution that would slightly interfere with a religion test for immigration!

1 Reply

@BillRM,

Bill, OmSig's ideas only seem simple-minded. He is a former lawyer and a mensa. He writes as he does because of his sense of humility.

0 Replies

@Mame,

Mame wrote:

And Bill, it's 'immigRANTS' not 'immigrATES'

Thank u, Mame.
I shoud not let it annoy me, but it does.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

And Shud is correct in the title of this thread? Razz

Come on people.....................

Not to add that unlike some people here my logic is always rock solid. Smile

1 Reply

@BillRM,

BillRM wrote:

And Shud is correct in the title of this thread?

Come on people.....................

Not to add that unlike some people here my logic is always rock solid.

Yeah, shud IS the correct way to spell it.
The other way is rong.
I am leading the way to enlightened spelling that shud have happened centuries ago.

U r not doing that, Bill.
I am skeptical of your estimate of your own logic, but
in candor, I will admit that I have not looked closely at what u have to say
because your poor grammar and inadequate spelling is rather painful to look at.
I don 't mean to be impolite, Bill, just descriptive.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

because your poor grammar and inadequate spelling is rather painful to look at.
I don 't mean to be impolite, Bill, just descriptive

David do not ever buy a mirror as you will not be happy looking into one. Razz

1 Reply

@BillRM,

David wrote:

because your poor grammar and inadequate spelling is rather painful to look at.
I don 't mean to be impolite, Bill, just descriptive

BillRM wrote:

David do not ever buy a mirror as you will not be happy looking into one.

I don 't choose to be redundant, Bill.
Explaining it once was enuf.

David

0 Replies

SHUD AMERICA ENACT COMMON SENSE IMMIGRATION LAWS?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know