Reply																		
							Sun 18 Apr, 2010 10:33 am
						
						
					
					
					
						WASHINGTON, April 16, 2010 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ ----
The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (CSGV) and Reaching Out 
to Others Together (ROOT) are deeply disturbed by Delegate 
Eleanor Holmes Norton's announcement that she is prepared 
to accept a D.C. voting rights bill with an amendment 
that would eradicate the city's gun laws. 
The "D.C. House Voting Rights Act," which would grant the 
District of Columbia a single voting Member in the House of 
Representatives and give Utah an additional seat, passed the Senate 
in February 2009 with the "Ensign Amendment" attached. 
The amendment, sponsored by Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) 
 would legalize assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines; 
repeal the District's licensing and registration system; 
allow some convicted substance abusers and violent misdemeanants 
to purchase and own firearms; 
roll back important regulations curbing illegal gun trafficking; and 
prevent the D.C. Council from enacting any gun-related legislation in the future. 
The bill has been held up in the House since that time, as Democratic 
leaders in the chamber lack the votes to pass clean legislation 
without a gun amendment attached. Delegate Norton has now 
indicated she wants to move forward with the legislation anyway, 
despite her previous assertion that, "The only thing that would 
cause more murder and mayhem in this city is allowing freer access to guns." 
"It is unfathomable that Delegate Norton would move forward 
with a bill that would legalize assault weapons in the wake of the 
recent mass shooting in the District involving an AK-47," said 
ROOT CEO Kenny Barnes, who was the recipient of the 2009 
Department of Justice's National Crime Victim Service Award. "As 
we begin observing National Crime Victims' Rights Week, the 
message that her actions send to the families of the children lost 
in that shooting -- and to all those who have been victimized by 
gun violence -- is that their safety is nothing more than a 
bargaining chip." 
Mayor Adrian Fenty recently told NewsChannel 8 that he is ready 
to accept this Faustian Bargain, despite past statements of support 
for tough federal regulations to curb illegal firearms trafficking. 
"Apparently Mayor Fenty was just paying lip service to the idea 
of denying guns to criminals," said CSGV Executive Director Josh Horwitz. 
"The Ensign Amendment would completely dismantle current 
law enforcement efforts to keep firepower off the streets. 
Any mayor that would give the up the ability to protect his 
citizens from crime and violence does not deserve the office." 
The willingness of Delegate Norton and Mayor Fenty to accept a 
gun amendment has split the home rule movement. Ilir Zherka, 
the executive director of the advocacy group DC Vote, has 
indicated he supports Norton's strategy, despite his organization's 
stated mission of "securing full voting representation in Congress 
and full democracy for the residents of the District of Columbia." 
Several of the groups that are part of the DC Vote Coalition 
stepped away from a meeting with Norton on Thursday afternoon 
in disbelief. 
"You can't secure democracy by allowing the National Rifle Association 
to write gun policy in place of our elected officials," said Mike 
Beard, the President of CSGV and former Executive Director 
of Self-Determination for D.C., a national coalition that was 
instrumental in enacting the "District of Columbia Home Rule 
Act." "That's the antithesis of self-determination." 
[All emfasis has been added by David.]
					
				 
				
						
														
					
												
Multiple be the chuckles.
David
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												
This is expected to come up for a vote next week.
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
												Hmm.  Interesting.  
This is politics at it's most... well political.  
The ploy is obvious, dangle gun ownership options out which would get more GOP votes.  Plus an additional Utah seat, which would probably go to the GOP.  In return get DC voting rights...  Hmm.
I can tell you, that this issue (voting representation) is one that the residents of DC are very passionate about.  Probably more passionate about than the gun topics.  It's a very liberal city, so it would be a democrat who would get the seat almost guaranteed.
I'd say this topic is hardly about guns.  
The implications are much larger.
K
O
											
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
													@Diest TKO,
												Diest TKO wrote:
Hmm.  Interesting.  
This is politics at it's most... well political.  
The ploy is obvious, dangle gun ownership options out which would get more GOP votes.  
Plus an additional Utah seat, which would probably go to the GOP.  In return get DC voting rights...  Hmm.
I can tell you, that this issue (voting representation) is one that the residents of DC are very passionate about.  Probably more passionate about than the gun topics.  It's a very liberal city, so it would be a democrat who would get the seat almost guaranteed.
I'd say this topic is hardly about guns.  
The implications are much larger.
K
O
 Tell us about the much larger implications.
											
 
					
				 
																
						
														
					
													@OmSigDAVID,
												It would change the congressional numbers.  This would effect many voting dynamics.  Even if both the Dems and GOP picked up a seat, it could effect future legislation.  This kind of thing could also encourage US territories to adopt statehood (in my opinion).
T
K
O