16
   

Dear Lord!! I just started Questioning my Sanity....

 
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 10:40 pm
@Merry Andrew,
I entered no contest! Have no relationship with stella artois or their advertising agencies.

I only allow friend (people I select) to access my face book. I have deliberatly set my privacy settings.
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 10:47 pm
@tsarstepan,
tsarstepan wrote:

"No class and no style..."???
http://i39.tinypic.com/11ugje8.jpg



MY PHOTOGRAPH IS BEING USED IN A FRAME THAT SAYS
.... NO CLASS NO STYLE
jUST WHERE THE **** DO YOU GET OFF YOU PISS ANT.
HOW THE BLOODY HELL DARE YOU ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 10:50 pm
@dadpad,
Ummm... sorry?
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 10:55 pm
@tsarstepan,
Too ******* late now aint it.

Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 10:56 pm
@dadpad,
I thought it was Nick Nolte.

Does mumpad know you resemble him?

(she might wanna trade up...)

you don't even look Australian.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 11:23 pm
I don't find any of this funny!
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 11:34 pm
Steven I suggest you remove the photos from tiny pic before i get really annoyed.

I have already de-friended you from facebook.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 11:55 pm
@dadpad,
Jesus Christ! They stole your pictures? That's got to be illegal. Tsar doesn't have legal capacity to authorize use of what isn't his.

Good picture, though.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 01:10 am
sounds like things about to get a whole lot worse

Quote:
Sunday, April 4, 2010

The signs of a new season surround us: Flowers are blooming, trees are budding, and another Facebook privacy fracas is brewing.

The last event kicked off a week ago, when the popular social network posted a note on its blog about "working with some partner Web sites that we pre-approve to offer a more personalized experience" at those sites.

This possible change didn't exactly get a charitable read in reactions like "Facebook's Plan To Automatically Share Your Data With Sites You Never Signed Up For," and "Facebook Planning To Give Away Your Data To 'Partners.' "
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/02/AR2010040200762.html?hpid=moreheadlines
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 02:08 am
Wheres tico?
no win no fee.
5% after costs
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 02:16 am
@dadpad,
Five percent? Tico don' get out of bed for less'n thirty. Plus costs.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 02:36 am
@tsarstepan,
tsarstepan wrote:
Quote:
Who the hell is Jacques d'Azur

Former owner of the Stella Artois brewery?

Fictional ad statesmen like Colonel Sanders for KFC
WHATAYAMEAN "FICTIONAL" ????
He 'd have been offended.

How 'd u like to be called "fictional"??





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 02:39 am
@roger,
roger wrote:
Five percent? Tico don' get out of bed for less'n thirty. Plus costs.
Most guys woudn't do it for less than 33%. + expenses
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 03:13 am
33% ?

Thats aboooout 3.96 bottles of Stella. Whats say we make it 4.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 03:22 am
@dadpad,
I'll drink to that, whatever the hell Stella might be.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  6  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 05:10 am
and that's why i try not to put a real picture on twitter or facebook
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 05:16 am
@tsarstepan,

Section 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law:




Section 51. Action for injunction and for damages.
Any person whose name, portrait or picture is used within this state
for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade without
the written consent first obtained as above provided may maintain
an equitable action in the supreme court of this state against
the person, firm or corporation so using his name, portrait or picture,
to prevent and restrain the use thereof; and may also sue and
recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use and
if the defendant shall have knowingly used such person`s name,
portrait or picture in such manner as is forbidden or declared to be
unlawful by section fifty of this article, the jury, in its discretion,
may award exemplary damages.

But nothing contained

in this article shall be so construed as to prevent any person, firm or

corporation from selling or otherwise transferring any material

containing such name, portrait or picture in whatever medium to any user

of such name, portrait or picture, or to any third party for sale or

transfer directly or indirectly to such a user, for use in a manner

lawful under this article; nothing contained in this article shall be so

construed as to prevent any person, firm or corporation, practicing the

profession of photography, from exhibiting in or about his or its

establishment specimens of the work of such establishment, unless the

same is continued by such person, firm or corporation after written

notice objecting thereto has been given by the person portrayed; and

nothing contained in this article shall be so construed as to prevent

any person, firm or corporation from using the name, portrait or picture

of any manufacturer or dealer in connection with the goods, wares and

merchandise manufactured, produced or dealt in by him which he has sold

or disposed of with such name, portrait or picture used in connection

therewith; or from using the name, portrait or picture of any author,

composer or artist in connection with his literary, musical or artistic

productions which he has sold or disposed of with such name, portrait or

picture used in connection therewith.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 05:22 am
@tsarstepan,

Section 50 NEW YORK CIVIL RIGHTS LAW:

Section 50. Right of privacy. A person, firm or corporation

that uses for advertising purposes, or for the purposes of trade,

the name, portrait or picture of any living person without having

first obtained the written consent of such person, or if a minor

of his or her parent or guardian, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  3  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 06:11 am
@dadpad,
DP, Tsar didn't do it....Stella did.

It's pretty outrageous, but I suggest it is fairer to complain to Stella.
ehBeth
 
  4  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2010 09:07 am
@dadpad,
dadpad wrote:
I only allow friend (people I select) to access my face book. I have deliberatly set my privacy settings.


one of many problems with FB privacy is that your profile pic is PUBLIC (it's one of the things noted when you look into the privacy settings).

I find it best not to use a real pic as my profile pic there. The real pics are in albums - as they are still private.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 08/17/2022 at 08:35:12